You are here: Forums Hatchbacks Honda Fit Honda Fit Real World MPG

Honda Fit Real World MPG

2439 messages,  Last post on Dec 06, 2009 at 5:06 AM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Hatchback

Messages Page 243 of 245 1 ... 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#2418 of 2439 Re: not impressed so far [jayboyd] by cwalti Oct 09, 2009 (7:43 am)
Replying to: jayboyd (Oct 09, 2009 6:55 am) Dude, get over it!! These readouts are just TOYS.. Get yerselfes a Scangauge, and you have a much more practical setup with calibration ability...   Suing over a gadget... Got nothing better to do? Classaction, - you obviously don't know how worthless that is for the individual participants!!!
#2419 of 2439 Re: I'd also like to know the name of the attorney who was taking cases on the [thurst1963] by cwalti Oct 09, 2009 (7:50 am)
Replying to: thurst1963 (Oct 09, 2009 7:39 am) I don't know what you guys are doing, but the other day I saw a guy going 95+ mph in his little Prius. I am cerrtain he didn't get 50 mpg. On the other end of the scale, I just returned from a vacation trip. My, stuffed to the gills, '99 V6 Ody wit an additional lbs300+ carrier basket got 24.5 mpg going at fwy speeds and making a total 4,000 feet climb. 300 miles from Los Angeles to Bishop. The CR-V ('05) got 28.5 mpg on the same run... Replies to this message: colloquor (Oct 09, 2009 10:19 am) stephen987 (Oct 09, 2009 12:45 pm) gasman2 (Oct 10, 2009 5:14 pm)
#2420 of 2439 Re: I'd also like to know the name of the attorney who was taking cases on the [cwalti] by colloquor Oct 09, 2009 (10:19 am)
Replying to: cwalti (Oct 09, 2009 7:50 am) I am surprised of the wide variances in reported fuel mileage between the onboard trip computer's readout, and measuring it the old fashioned way. I've always calculated fuel economy the old fashioned way - miles driven/gallons used. But, this can be hard to do these days with the need to be very careful not to overflow the evaporative emission control system, and get fuel into the carbon canister. Topping up the tank is not an easy thing these days!   Every car I've owned which had an onboard trip computer with fuel economy readout never varied more that +/- .5 MPG from the old fashioned way of calculation mileage. So, something must really be wrong with the algorithm used in the computer, or the sensors.   I know that I would be upset with 25 to 27 MPG with a Fit, as our minivan with a 3.8L V6 gets over 28 MPG on the highway consistently. Moreover, I have a friend in the UK with a Honda Jazz (the European Fit equivalent), and he gets over 40 MPG. Replies to this message: stephen987 (Oct 09, 2009 12:45 pm) gasman2 (Oct 10, 2009 5:14 pm)
#2421 of 2439 just got 16 mpg on a full tank in my '08 Fit by bilbofett Oct 09, 2009 (10:53 am)
I've been driving it more than a year, since august of 2008. Its beyond 7,000 miles, has been broken in, has had oil changes, etc. I'm not driving it like a loon, and even if I was, theres no way in hell driving it like a crazy person would cut the mileage by 60%. I've kept it under 3,000 rpms. I've stayed below 70, I've accelerated slowly and glided into stops. Did that for entire tanks of gas... didn't make a lick of difference.
#2422 of 2439 Re: I'd also like to know the name of the attorney who was taking cases on the [colloquor] by stephen987 Oct 09, 2009 (12:45 pm)
Replying to: colloquor (Oct 09, 2009 10:19 am) On my Fit the gauge is consistently high by about 10%, which is 3-4 mpg. Replies to this message: gasman2 (Oct 10, 2009 5:14 pm)
#2423 of 2439 Re: I'd also like to know the name of the attorney who was taking cases on by gasman2 Oct 10, 2009 (5:14 pm)
Replying to: stephen987 (Oct 09, 2009 12:45 pm) My "09 Mini classic has 2 speedos which are 10% out when checked with my GPS. I knew there was a problem before I even checked it. Both speedos agree saying that I am going faster than I really am. This 10% error is also putting extra kilometers on my car that really isn't true. I believe the factory does this on purpose to display better gas mileage figures than we are really getting. Dealer says there is nothing he can do. Am presently in talks with the Mini people. I believe my GPS is 100% accurate and can figure out my true mileage accordingly. Anyone else with these issues?
#2424 of 2439 Re: sport AT 560 miles [thatsmycall] by maxhray Oct 10, 2009 (8:49 pm)
Replying to: thatsmycall (May 03, 2006 11:57 am) I Get 35 MPG Around Town With Auto. And A/C Going Most Of The Time.   I Have The 2009 Sport With 6,000 Miles..No Trips As Yet..Can Only Get Better!!
#2425 of 2439 Re: New 09 Fit ... first 2 tanks ... [baddog2] by aaykay Oct 11, 2009 (7:56 am)
Replying to: baddog2 (Oct 23, 2008 7:31 pm) I just put 250 miles on it today .. all highway miles with cruise control set at 65 mph and the mpgs look like they're going to be down from the 2nd tank as the car's computer is showing 39.4 mpg and I covered less miles on the first half tank of gas.   Are you saying that you are driving with cruise control on, before you completed the break-in of the car ? The wear patterns on your "virgin" engine are still being established and I personally would take some additional care and NEVER drive it with cruise control for the first 1000 miles.   I have been struggling to complete my break-in miles by continuously varying the RPMs while not allowing it to cross 4000 rpm. I have another 400 miles to go, before I can start driving at a constant RPM for better mileage. Even with the fuel-sapping break-in driving, the mileage is a little over 35mpg, which means that with more constant rpm driving, the mileage should be significantly better.
#2426 of 2439 Re: On board trip computer should be adjustable. [stephen987] by aaykay Oct 11, 2009 (8:22 am)
Replying to: stephen987 (Aug 08, 2009 4:13 pm) I've heard some people say that the gauge lacks a correction factor for powertrain losses, and that it is more accurate with a manual transmission than with an automatic.   Interesting. This is because I calculated the mileage versus what was being displayed on the computer and found that my calculated value was roughly 1mpg below the average displayed by the computer. The calculated value was a little over 35mpg, while the computer indicated a little over 36mpg.   Mine is an 09 Fit Sport Manual Trans.   PS: I typically ignore the dealer fill and as soon as I get home, I go to my favorite Shell or BP gas station and fill it till the first click (at a specific pump to make it more exact), set the trip-meter and calculate the mileage from there. To calculate the mileage, I divide the miles driven - since the last tripmeter reset - by the gallons filled till the first click (at that specific pump, in that specific gas station)   PS1: For whatever reason, I am seeing better mileage from my 09 MT Fit Sport than my previous 08 MT Fit Base, even though according to the EPA numbers, the figures should be reversed. I will allow some more miles to accumulate before I can be definitive here. But as it stands, even with the fuel-sapping break-in driving with constantly varying RPMs, I am getting over 35mpg (most of it is stop-and-go city driving), which is just fantastic.
#2427 of 2439 39.2 mpg by lovemyfit1 Oct 11, 2009 (10:07 am)
I've had my base model automatic Fit for two months and drive it both on the highway and around town. It consistently gets over 39 mpg in combined mileage. I think this should be more widely advertised since the actual mpg is so much higher than the manufacturer or EPA ratings. Replies to this message: roxy11 (Oct 18, 2009 4:41 am) stephen987 (Oct 18, 2009 5:57 am) aaykay (Oct 18, 2009 4:22 pm)

Messages Page 243 of 245 1 ... 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Hatchbacks Honda Fit Honda Fit Real World MPG