Sign In Join 



Honda Fit Real World MPG

2438 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 1:51 PM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Hatchback


Messages Page 242 of 245
1
...
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2404 of 2438
The MPG gauge and the real world by jarew
Jul 22, 2009 (8:47 am)
Reply
48.4 mpg for my first tank of gas using on board gauge Wow or what gives?
Actual from mileage to gallons used was 37.5 mpg which is still a WOW.
Base model five speed manual 80/20 highway/city.
love my new fit.
 
JAREW
#2405 of 2438
Re: The MPG gauge and the real world [jarew] by stephen987
Jul 22, 2009 (11:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: jarew (Jul 22, 2009 8:47 am)

Nice mileage. But what's not so nice is the 25-30% error in the gauge.
 
I got an indicated 42.4 during a rather "aggressive" test drive session a couple of weeks ago. Even if that translates only to a real-world 34 mpg, it's still better than my Civic gets when driven comparably.
#2406 of 2438
Re: The MPG gauge and the real world [stephen987] by roxy11
Jul 24, 2009 (2:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: stephen987 (Jul 22, 2009 11:11 am)

those disparities between the computer and the actual mileage are outrageous. i seen people brag about 42 mpg, but they never wonder why they are using 10 gallons of gas to fill up after a 350 mile tank. on my 09 corolla, if the dispay shows 43.4 mpg, then i consistently know that my real calculated mileage will be over 41.4 mpg. (it is always less than 2 mpg off).
 
i have to think honda could remedy this, but too many drivers not in the know would have to face the reality that the mileage of the fit isnt as rosy as they think.
#2407 of 2438
Re: The MPG gauge and the real world [stephen987] by gatortom1
Jul 24, 2009 (11:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: stephen987 (Jul 22, 2009 11:11 am)

I'm really surprised at THAT much disparity between real mileage and computer monitor mileage. With over 90% of the posts here the difference is 10 to 12 pecent. I have kept careful records since I bought my 2009 base Fit automatic in Sept. 2008. 5040 miles with 141 gallons. (35.7 actual mpg with roughly 60% suburban/40% highway.) On each fill-up I record CPU mileage and compute real mileage. That percent difference has varied from around 9% to around 12% with a few outliers both below and above that. The difference also appears about the same whether it is a highway tank at 42 actual mpg, or a surban tank at 32 to 35 mpg. I still hit pretty close by subtracting 10% from whatever the CPU says.
 
Some of the disparity across reporters may be CPU versus real mileage--although I also noted before that I actually got 47.5 mpg over 280 miles on an interstate tank that involved a lot of drafting behind 18-wheelers doing 65 mile per hour.
#2408 of 2438
On board trip computer should be adjustable. by kipk
Jul 24, 2009 (12:52 pm)
Reply
A "Scan Gauge"can be corrected for errors. It takes a couple of tanks to get it "Tuned" to the car. When doing a fillup it will say how many gallons it thinks were used. The driver can input the correct amount according to the gas pump.
 
It will also say how many miles were driven. The driver can can calibrate the Scan Gauge to the car's odometer by adjusting the indicated speed. For example the car is driven 100 miles according to the odometer. But the scan gauge says the car traveled 98 miles. That is a 2% difference and the gauge can be adjusted to reflect "+2" . Then the next time the car is driven a given distance, the gauge will agree with the odometer. Or pretty close as it also measures the fuel used when in reverse.
 
Problem is, that odometers are not the most accurate of devices. So we really don't know if the odometer is more accurate, or the gauge. If we don't believe that, Next time on an X-way, reset the tripometer at a given mile marker. Drive a hundred miles and see how far off the odometer really is. Another, and even more accurate way, is to set a GPS for trip. It will tell us how far we have traveled as well as how fast we are going. That can be compared to the odometer and other devices.
 
The differences folks are seeing may actually be the cars odometer, the cars trip computer or a combination of the two.
 
The key for super accurate results, the fill ups must be done exactly the same way every time. Same nozzle setting, same pump, same car position, etc..And know how accurate the measuring devices actually are.
 
Kip
#2409 of 2438
Re: On board trip computer should be adjustable. [kipk] by stephen987
Aug 08, 2009 (4:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kipk (Jul 24, 2009 12:52 pm)

I've heard some people say that the gauge lacks a correction factor for powertrain losses, and that it is more accurate with a manual transmission than with an automatic.
 
So far, I've done 300.6 miles/9.06 gallons for a calculated 33.2 mpg on my very first tank, mostly in stop-and-go suburban driving on no-name gasoline. The gauge reading was 35.3. I'm looking forward to seeing how it does as it gets broken in more thoroughly. It's already significantly better than the '99 Civic it mostly replaces.
#2410 of 2438
Re: never breaking 18 mpg in my 08 Fit! - very depressed and at wits end [madams1] by bullfrog3
Aug 24, 2009 (12:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: madams1 (Jul 11, 2009 3:24 pm)

I know that this is an older post, but something is wrong! The mileage in your Fit should be almost as good as the hybrids (with a lot less to go wrong and no heavy battery to lug around and then require an expensive replacement in a few years!) Plus the Fit is a lot more fun to drive than any Prius . . .
 
My almost new 09 Fit with manual trans gets in the low to mid 40's actual MPG corrected (thanks to my wife's careful driving), so you should not have to wait for it to break-in further.
 
Assuming you:
 
-have correct tire pressure (try at least 36 - 38 psi),
-are not using ethanol gas (this could cause a 20 to 30% hit on MPG),
-are not driving in a aggressive fashion (this could cut your MPG in half easily),
-are not doing all stop and go traffic (heavy traffic is where the diesels and hybrids do well),
-are staying under 70 mph most of the time,
-are keeping the engine below 3,000 rpm as much as possible
-are letting the car warm up completely (driving 10 minutes at a time will not warm up the engine/transmission and your MPG will be 15 to 20% or more low - Open-Loop in the computer)
-don't have a leak or someone stealing your gas,
-are getting into top gear with your automatic transmission (RPM at 60 mph?)
-are driving in the "Drive" position (letting the automatic shift itself) and not the "Sport" position on the auto trans (and shifting with the paddle shifters at high rpm)
-don't let the car idle for long periods (its OK to shut down at long lights)
-don't get any error codes - I'm not sure if they would show a bad spark plug - but this would show as loss of power or rough idle.
-have done the Idle Learn Procedure suggested earlier.
-are sure that your hand brake (parking brake) is releasing completely
-have tried driving 5 to 10 miles at 50 mph or more without using your brakes at all and then coasting to a stop (going up a hill helps), then feel your brake discs and drums (the discs and drums should be barely warm - if you can't touch all four of them without burning your hand - then that's the problem)
-have checked your odometer against known accurate highway mileposts.
-are calculating your MPG by Miles Driven/Gallons Used and not using the MPG gage numbers which are known not to be very accurate.
 
Then I would try the following:
 
See if you can buy or borrow a ScanGage II for your Fit. This is a digital readout unit that plugs into the cars computer system. The same unit works on most cars made after 1996 (with the OBD II computer system) One costs about $140 new, but if it fixes your problem it will quickly pay for itself in gas saved. The same Scan Gage will work on most modern cars so you can think of it as a tool investment and move it from car to car as needed. Or you can put it back in the box and sell it on eBay for $100 after you are finished with it.
 
The ScanGage II will give you an instantaneous readout in gallons per hour for all conditions: idle, coast, cruise, full-throttle, etc. It will read water temperature (low temp equals low MPG). It can be adjusted to read instantaneous and average MPG within a few percent by entering a correction after each fill-up.
 
This is the best way for the average driver to monitor MPG and fuel consumption plus it gives you a lot more information about the engine. It will indicate if you have correct Spark Advance (in general more advance will improve MPG until the engine starts to "ping"). It will confirm that the engine computer has switched to Closed-Loop operation as soon as it warms up (always in Open-Loop will hurt MPG). It will measure Intake Air Temperature (warm is good for mileage). It will show Battery Voltage (always high - above 15 volts - might indicate an alternator overcharging the battery, which might hurt your MPG).
 
It scans the engine for any trouble codes and stores and reads out any found. This would allow you to confirm the dealer's analysis or discover any code problems that he may have missed. It has many other features but these are the ones that would be important for good MPG. See their web site for more information.
 
Once you get it calibrated and working (it will take a few days to appreciate all the features) you will be able to determine and compare your results with other folks. I'll be glad to move my ScanGage from my Acura to my 09 Fit with manual transmission to give you some readings for comparison. If your ScanGage numbers don't make sense, then it may indicate computer problems as well, but I would expect the code readout to have shown a problem here.
 
Good Luck!
#2411 of 2438
Commandrine by aue
Sep 16, 2009 (9:18 am)
Reply
09 Fit after 2 months and 3,000 miles: 40.7 mpg
#2412 of 2438
Re: not impressed so far [tiff_c] by fitfight
Oct 04, 2009 (7:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tiff_c (Dec 07, 2007 1:11 pm)

I have a 2008 Fit Sport. Last year when I purchased the car and it got worse mileage than my old 94 civic ex, I couldn't find info on the web. Today I heard that north of boston there is an attorney taking cases on.
 
I do not have a lead foot. I have had the car tested 2x by the dealer, including checking pressure. The Fit Sport has alloy wheels. I have a regional managers phone number and this week, I will be calling and following up with a letter. I get 18-22 mpg with mixed driving, but little sitting at lights. I rarely use the a.c. I hypermile on downhill grades and at longer red lights. I weigh under 150. I don't carry bricks. Something is wrong with the car and that has nothing to do with the EPA and whatever vehicles they tested. The dealer says everything in the car is computerized and it reads out fine. I was told to change my oil (did) , I was told to "wait a while as the car breaks in." Now, am I supposed to wait until the warrantee runs out? I think not. I want to know what satisfaction anyone has received from Honda. Thank you all.
#2413 of 2438
Re: not impressed so far [fitfight] by bilbofett
Oct 04, 2009 (8:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fitfight (Oct 04, 2009 7:37 pm)

I'm the one that started this thread, and when the first responses were all "sucks to be you" and "oh well" I got pissed off, as I was already at my wits end, and basically gave up on the forum. I've had the same experience on 2 other forums as well.
I've seen that since then a few people have been quite detailed and helpful and I appreciate that.
Fitfight, I'd like to know the name of that lawyer please. I will probably be in that class action lawsuit.
So far I've called Honda customer service, they opened up a case for me, and they've told me I need to get a "fuel consumption" test from my local Honda shop.
I tried twice to do this, and both times they rescheduled, or I drove all the way down there and they said they couldn't fit it in.
I haven't been able to get it tested since I work and I can't afford to rent a car right now while they have some teenager drive my car around to test the mileage.
I will probably take it to another dealer but that one is an hour away and so I'll have to take a day off work to take it there.
I'll let you guys know the results of the test, and then what Honda said to me after I call them back with the results.

Messages Page 242 of 245
1
...
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement