Sign In Join 



Honda Fit Real World MPG

2432 messages,  Last post on Oct 29, 2009 at 4:50 AM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Hatchback


Messages Page 240 of 244
1
...
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2387 of 2432
Re: Driving Technique For Maximum Mileage [robotaz2] by gatortom1
Jun 16, 2009 (10:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: robotaz2 (Jun 15, 2009 8:56 am)

Sorry robotaz2 but you have your nose TOO deep in a physics book. In a vacuum, without factors such as wind drag, you would be correct but not in the real world. Bike a few 50 to 70 mile days over differing terrain for yourself as I do. At 10 to 12 mph, wind drag is nearly insignificant while at 30 mph a biker is exerting nearly 80% of his/her energy just to overcome wind resistence. (The increase with speed is logorithmic and not direct.) When you climb a steep hill you expend and store significant potential energy to overcome gravity. On the way back down you gain the advantage of that stored energy MINUS the extra you loose to significantly increased wind resistence. At least I suspect that is the physics behind the clear fact that multiple hills suck more energy than flat terraine. (My gently rolling training route of 36 miles consistantly takes several minutes less time than my 32-mile round trip climbing route that includes 3200 feet of altitude change.)
#2388 of 2432
Trip MPG by dadof6
Jun 21, 2009 (12:55 pm)
Reply
Geez Louise you guys take this stuff way to seriously. '07 Sport AT 40,000 miles.
3488 miles and 99 gals used comes to 35mpg. (am I allowed to round numbers)
Trip was from western SD to NY city,1% was in stop & go traffic and 80% was driven at speeds higher than 65mph. Indiana,Iowa,Minnesota & SD have limits of at least 70mph. We used cruise about 95% of the time,stopped every 2hrs for breaks.
3 adults & 1 12 yr old child + baggage for a 9 day trip. Yes we bottomed out the suspension in the rear a handfull of times. BTW I replace the air filter 1/2 way thru the trip & it had no affect on mpg.
#2389 of 2432
Re: Second Law [wistlo] by kipk
Jun 22, 2009 (4:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: wistlo (Jun 16, 2009 6:31 am)

>"When driving on hills, the First Law tells us exactly the same energy expended climbing a hill is recovered during descent. Think of a roller coaster that gets pulled up by force and then travels its course without any mechanical input."
 
Good analogy.
 
A roller coaster, with only one mechanical assist, is pulled to it's highest point at the beginning. From that point it is released and gravity takes over. The combination of the up hill grades is less distance and/or angle than the combination of the downhill grades. So it reaches it's destination at the bottom. Some of the larger, longer, roller coasters require more than one mechanical assist.
 
Engineers use physics and other stuff to figure in the factors to make the "Coaster" function as it should. I expect those same engineers can dig up some formulas that explain exactly why a car in mountainous terrain gets less mileage than on flat ground.
 
A marble allowed to roll down a given hard surfaced grade will not continue and roll up an identical grade for the same distance. It will always fall a little short. When it stops forward momentum and begins to roll backward, it will fall short going back up the first grade and so forth until it eventually stops. That marble likely has nowhere near the resistance to movement as a moving car. When a skate boarder in a half pipe stops exerting extra energy, he will quickly come to a stop at the bottom, because there is simply not enough energy built and stored by the gravity effect to make it all the way to the top of the other side of the half pipe, in the real world.
 
So far we haven't found a way to overcome the "slow down" factors in real world, without exerting "Extra" energy.
 
Until we do, we are forced to live in a world that requires more fuel to be used in mountainous driving than flat ground driving.
 
Kip
#2390 of 2432
Re: Second Law [kipk] by wistlo
Jun 22, 2009 (6:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: kipk (Jun 22, 2009 4:04 am)

The "slow down factors" do not vary significantly with the angle of incline. In all the examples cited (marble, skateboard, etc), similar frictional losses exist in both flat and variable inclines.
 
The major source of loss in hilly driving is braking, regardless of source of friction (brakes or engine pumping against a closed throttle). Hybrids recover some of those losses by converting deceleration forces into stored energy.
 
Engine performance does vary under load, but it's a moderate to minor effect. The evidence is out on the highway: On hilly I-81, I get within 1-2 MPG of the mileage as I do on flat I-10 in both a FIt and a Civic, both with manual transmissions.
#2391 of 2432
Don't take EPA/Edmunds MPG ratings as fact by gr00v3
Jun 22, 2009 (9:35 am)
Reply
In my 2007 Fit Sport, I managed 38.5 MPG on a drive from RI to NH, doing 75mph average, with the car loaded up with camping gear, and with the A/C on.
 
No, I'm not having you on.
 
All I did was to ensure that the tachometer never--or rarely--went above 3000rpm.
#2392 of 2432
Re: Don't take EPA/Edmunds MPG ratings as fact [gr00v3] by tiff_c
Jun 22, 2009 (5:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gr00v3 (Jun 22, 2009 9:35 am)

Well we live in the middle of NH and our last tank was our best at 37mpg and we have a lot of hills here, not to mention the 10% ethanol required in all gas sold here.
#2393 of 2432
Re: Don't take EPA/Edmunds MPG ratings as fact [tiff_c] by pf_flyer HOST
Jun 23, 2009 (3:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: tiff_c (Jun 22, 2009 5:55 pm)

Regardless of the driving conditions where you happen to live, ethanol is a huge cause of decreased mileage performance. The The Inconvenient Truth About Ethanol discussion is a good place to chime in on your ethanol experiences
#2394 of 2432
Re: Don't take EPA/Edmunds MPG ratings as fact [tiff_c] by roxy11
Jul 03, 2009 (5:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tiff_c (Jun 22, 2009 5:55 pm)

i hope everyone posting their mileage for the fit arent using numbers from the computer mileage display since most fit owners know it is consistently high, 10+% high quite commonly.
#2395 of 2432
MPG update by byron2
Jul 09, 2009 (6:42 pm)
Reply
'09 Sport Automatic. On a trip from San Francisco to San Diego I got gas in Santa Barbara. On the last leg to San Diego the Fit got 46 mpg. I know the computer is a bit optimistic but wow! Great car.
#2396 of 2432
never breaking 18 mpg in my 08 Fit! - very depressed and at wits end by bilbofett
Jul 10, 2009 (7:09 pm)
Reply
In almost a year I have never, ever, ever broken past 18 mpg or gone over about 200 on a full tank on the odometer! Please read and offer any advice/tips/help you can.
 
I'll give you the full story so someone can maybe identify something I haven't thought of yet.
 
Bought my 08' Automatic Fit Sport in August of 2008.
It only registered 30 test-driven miles on it, being brand new.
The dealership was a good hour from my house, and they filled up the tank all the way, and I drove it all the way home on the freeway, averaging between 55-70 the whole way.
Even then I wasn't that excited about the gas mileage.
The next day, I was almost broadsided by some jerk who was going about 150 and going into my lane. I had no choice but to slam on the breaks and swerve left and right really fast so I wouldn't hit the car next to me, avoiding him.
That incident balded my tires a bit, and I think my car eventually got out of alignment from that.
 
I was a little suspicious of the dealership because they were selling another color of the new '08 Fit and it had custom tinting on all the windows... the Fits don't come that way.. so what gives, were they selling a returned one and saying it was new?
 
Ok... thats the sum total of the negative forces (that I'm aware of) that have impacted my car.
I've only done 1 oil change, and theres less than 6,000 miles on it now, almost a year later. I've only EVER put in Mobil or Chevron, and never used the cheapo gasses. On this recent oil change, I put in a synthetic Mobil1 oil filter. I changed the air filter and cabin filter, even though it was way under the time needed, obviously.
 
I took it to another dealership and told them my story and had their service department check it over. They (said) they checked it top to bottom; no faults or codes on the computers, the breaks aren't sticking (thereby causing extra friction which I was suspicious of). They offered to have one of their technicians drive it an hour away and back and check the mileage but I told him I've done that over and over and over. They said they didn't know what to tell me. They offered stories of salespeople who own the Honda Pilot and they were very displeased with the mileage until after about 15,000 miles the gas mileage suddenly went up, apparently after the engine was broken in.
 
Eh.
 
I don't drag race it, I don't drive it like its a sports car, and even when I've done entire tanks driving like a very cautious old lady, the mileage is pretty much the same. Whether I drive 90% freeway or 90% city, the mileage is the same. Whether I have lots of passengers or just myself, the mileage is the same.
 
When the dealership says they can't find anything wrong with it.. .what am I supposed to do?
 
I'm a young single guy and I could've bought a Mustang for this kind of mileage. I tried to be wise and sensible and I wanted to save more money on gas in the longrun than look cool and impress people. I test drove the Yaris, the Nissan Versa, and the Fit. I had to go with the Fit because of the safety rating, the cheaper auto insurance, and the overall features and kudos/awards from all the car magazines.
 
I know, this was a very long story and I'm sorry for that but I wanted to give you the full details so y'all wouldn't have to ask for them later.
 
My parents drive a 6-cylinder GMC Jimmy SUV thats from 2001 and it gets... 18-20 mpg... the same as my damn Fit!!
 
I saw a guy today driving the 2009 Fit Sport and I asked him what kind of mileage he is getting and he looked on his dash and said it was reading 33, and he said thats about right.
 
That's when I decided enough is enough.
 
The fact that it needs an alignment and the tires are slightly balded a little can't possibly kill the mileage by 10 mpg or more??? I've checked and re-checked everything over and over. The air pressure in my tires is correct. Like I said, I've never used cheap gas. Its only had 1 oil change. All the filters are brand new in it since I changed them a few weeks ago. I run the AC alot but so do others who live around here, including that guy who gets 33 mpg average.
 
I need some advice/help on who to contact.. Honda corporate? I have absolutely no idea who I would call or email there.... maybe contact a consumer advocate to put on the heat? the dealership I bought the car from?? I want to start getting the 27/33 mileage this car is rated for, or I want a different car.
 
I'm sick of this. I'm tired of throwing my money away. Maybe I should've bought a Prius like I was thinking. I know, I know... you end up paying about 7,000 more in the long run. But I could *REALLY* use that immediate gas savings in my wallet right here and now!
 
Someone, anyone... please help me figure this out... shed some light on this!
 
P.S. Thanks for listening

Messages Page 240 of 244
1
...
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement