Sign In Join 



Honda Fit Real World MPG

2432 messages,  Last post on Oct 29, 2009 at 4:50 AM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Hatchback


Messages Page 236 of 244
1
...
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
...
244
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2349 of 2432
Re: 31.5 mpg calculated, 100% short city trips [wistlo] by IslandJeff
Feb 05, 2009 (3:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wistlo (Feb 05, 2009 1:14 pm)

Just got an 09 Fit Sport, manual transmission. The dealer filled the tank at 6 miles on the odometer. At 270 miles on the odometer (264 miles driven) it took 6.95 gallons to fill - about 38.0 mpg and almost exactly the 37.9 average mpg that was showing in the gauge. That driving was 30% city (80 miles) and 70% highway at 60 to 70 mph. I'm waiting to see how the next tank will go - the gauge is showing about 40 mpg! I am REALLY happy with the mileage so far.
#2350 of 2432
Re: MPG guage vs. gas pump [pmeyers] by gatortom1
Feb 09, 2009 (1:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pmeyers (Jan 19, 2009 2:49 pm)

With only 1500 miles on my 2009 Fit, I haven't established known "exact" consistency with the gas minder system but mine is regestering 10% to 12% high just like most others are reporting. I can do a mental coversion of 10% less without a lot of stress to find out what I am really using in gas. True, it would be nice to have an exact measure to the 1/10th mpg as mentioned in another post but the value of the system is to assist in achieving good driving habits for getting the best gas mileage. That goal can be accomplished without EXACT continuing readouts as long as they are reasonably consistent. If this is a huge issue for you, the $160 added instrumentation mentioned in the other post would be a better trade--off than giving up such a fantastic little car.
#2351 of 2432
Driving Technique For Maximum Mileage by cmobi
Mar 10, 2009 (9:25 pm)
Reply
I have a 2008 Fit Sport MT and typically get around 30 to 35 mpg driving around town and on flat highway. I have gotten 40-45 mpg under very specific circumstances. No headwind, no air conditioner, no passengers (these really hurt your mileage). Hilly terrane where you can coast downhill helps alot, especially if steep enough to be to be totally off the throttle - I think the gas shuts off completely to the engine. If not quite that steep, then either shift into neutral temporarily or just keep the clutch pressed to coast while the engine idles to maintain an acceptable speed without using the engine. These intervals of coasting can more than offset the periods of charging up the next hill. When you do accelerate, do so pretty quickly to get in top gear as soon as possible. Try to minimize braking. Try to coast up to red lights as much as possible and turn off engine at long stoplights. If not crowded on flat terrane, try speeding up to say 65 or 70 mph, then coast back to around 55 mph (in gear or in neutral), repeat as long as you can bear it. I think small engines run most efficiently at heavy throttle and at idle. The barely-open partial throttle to maintain a steady 50-70 mph is not efficient. Finally, get a ScanGauge if you have a 2008 Fit. It's difficult to calibrate accurately with each fillup because of the Fit's small gas tank but it really helps by keeping you aware of your mileage.
#2352 of 2432
2009 Fit Road Trip by wistlo
Mar 11, 2009 (5:32 am)
Reply
On a road trip from the Gulf Coast to Pittsburgh during Mardi Gras (last week of Feb), our 2009 FIt got between 34 and 38 MPG.
 
We had driver + two passengers (about 450 lb, don't ask about weight distribution, please), luggage, toys, about 50 lb of bottled water.
 
Tires were at 38 PSI, up from the 32 recommended.
 
Terrain was rolling hills, almost entirely on cruise control.
Sporadic A/C use with defroster.
 
Mileage definitely depends on speed; 60-65 yields near 38 MPG, 70 MPH about 34.
 
Coasting: On a 2001 CIvic manual with a OBDII meter connected, I noticed that fuel flow seems to drop to near zero when decelerating with the engine engaged. (I have not tried this on the Fit yet). I theorize that if the throttle is at idle (no pedal), the ECU will reduce or shut off fuel flow as long as engine speed is over idle speed.
 
 On both Hondas (Fit & Civic) I have stopped coasting with clutch disengaged, which requires the engine to idle under its own power, and I now keep the car in gear during deceleration. It is difficult to tell whether this makes a significant difference in consumption.
 
After the trip with the Fit, the left front tire developed a bubble in the sidewall. This wasn't covered by the OEM warranty, but fortunately I took out a road-hazard warranty when I bought the car. The warranty people would not cover a sidewall bubble unless there was damage to the inside of the tire. The tire technician helped me find a very small split near the bubble site.
 
The Fit Sport's tire size, 185-55-16, is not common (in fact, I think the Fit is the only car using it, so far). I had to drive for a day with the bubble while waiting for it to come in by special order.
#2353 of 2432
by seaf
Mar 12, 2009 (12:54 pm)
Reply
wonder if the high 38 PSI had anything to do with the tire bubble. Seems way too high, even for 100% highway driving, than the recommended 32psi. Any variance in temperature could've brought it even higher, which is not good for tires.
#2354 of 2432
Re: Black 5psd. Sport MT [gatortom1] by rterry
Mar 20, 2009 (7:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: gatortom1 (Feb 03, 2009 1:45 pm)

Regarding the 09 Honda Fit mileage computer accuracy.
 
The computer provides the current gas mileage (in the moment). Unless you maintain a given mileage reading over the entire range of a tankfull of gas, you will find that the actual mileage (calculated the old fashioned way) is about 3 mpg less than the computer reads when you stop for fill-up. This has been my experience with predominant highway driving in an 09 Fit Sport. In town driving my vary even more depending on how you drive.
 
Overall, I find the Fit gas mileage quite sensitive to the speeds maintained. At 80-85 mph on the highway I can consistently get 30-31 (real) mpg. Lower speeds 60-65 can produce 37-40 (real) mpg. In town is around 26-28 without trying too hard.
#2355 of 2432
Re: [seaf] by wistlo
Mar 20, 2009 (8:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: seaf (Mar 12, 2009 12:54 pm)

The tires' maximum pressure is 44 PSI cold, so 38 is well under that rating. Older Hondas ran with 30 and 32 PSI recommendations for tires whose maximum rated pressure was 36 PSI, so the margin of error with these babies is larger.
 
Low profile tires (for the Fit Sport, 55 series, meaning the tire is 55% as tall as it is wide) I suspect are more susceptible to damage from striking discontinuities in the road surface. The older Civic has same width (185) but are 65 series, and those tires soak up bumps with more compliance. The lower profile does give the Fit lightning-fast, go-kart like steering response. It is a true pleasure to drive.
 
We have studiously avoided the legions of potholes in post-Katrina New Orleans. I suspect the damage was done by a large unexpected gouge on I-65 N just south of Cincinnati. (Middle lane, left side).
#2356 of 2432
Re: Black 5psd. Sport MT [rterry] by pmeyers
Mar 20, 2009 (10:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: rterry (Mar 20, 2009 7:03 am)

The computer also purports to report an AVERAGE MPG. Of course the instantaneous MPG varies all over the map. My quarrel is with the purported AVG MPG reading which, in my vehicle is around 20% higher than measured MPG. As I have reported earlier, there is no adjustment and Honda really doesn't care about the inaccuracy of this measurement.
 
BTW, my measured MPG for the first 4,000 miles or so has been roughly 36 mpg with 70% city/suburban, 30% freeway mileage.
#2357 of 2432
09 Fit Sport Report by ak_fit
Mar 20, 2009 (7:49 pm)
Reply
About 5800 miles on 09 Fit Sport Auto in Alaska. MPG 33 using math. Computer is about 20% higher. Since Nov I've run Michelin Xi i2 snow tires (awesome) on Civic steel rims purchased form the Honda dealer for something like $55 each. Size 185 / 60 15". The Alaska cold and road conditions may influence mpg
#2358 of 2432
Re: Driving Technique For Maximum Mileage [cmobi] by bobw3
Mar 24, 2009 (7:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: cmobi (Mar 10, 2009 9:25 pm)

Some of your MPG "tips" don't sound too right to me. Everything I've read and experienced indicates that the best MPG will come from a constant speed on flat terrain, not by hard accelarations followed by periods of coasting.
 
And if the effort of going uphill was offsetted by coasting downhill, then you might want to ask a biker if it's easier to pedal 10 miles on flat ground or up and down hills...they'll tell you that it takes much less energy to go a given distance on flat ground than up and down hills. And likewise for a car it takes more energy to go up and down hills. It's the "objects in motion tend to stay in motion" theory, so once you have a vehicle at a certain speed, it doesn't take much energy to maintain that speed.
 
What you may want to try to test this is drive a couple of hundred miles on a flat highway. Once at a constant 55mph and the other doing your accelaration/coasting method and then manually calculate your MPG and report back.

Messages Page 236 of 244
1
...
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
...
244
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement