You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Honda Fit
Honda Fit v. Scion xB

66 messages, Last post on Apr 14, 2009 at 6:00 AM
You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: aatherton (May 02, 2006 1:39 pm) Congrats, because in my xB, I also averaged 27, mixed driving, and not "spirited" driving. REALLY disappointing. |
|
| It's making mine look more common. | |
|
|
|
I would love to know if anyone has a sense of how the air conditioning compares in the Fit. I test drove the Fit on a cool foggy day ,so I didn't feel how it performed. On my Scion xB the a/c is sub par; if you are in the front you make out okay but, the back never gets cool. Also, does anyone know the 0 to 60 performance specs on the Fit? For the xB it is 11.4. I find the xB a bit poky and not a good choice for a long highway trip. I like the Fit a lot, but, don't want another around the town car. |
|
|
I'm considering an xB purchase, but the current xB does not accelerate well. So I thought I'll wait for the 2007 model. Does anyone know any specs yet for the xb 2007? Colours? Thanks VV
|
|
The Xb'x engine gets terrible mileage considering its almost Geo Metro like acceleration. That and the lack of ANY back seat amenities/cupholders/unhappy kid back there... Those were deal-breakers.
|
|
|
Replying to: manko (May 01, 2006 10:01 pm) One thing I like about honda's small engines is they can really rev and likes to be reved. But it gets real buzzy at highway speeds. toyota's gearing are better for highway cruising, and the clutch is actually easier to engage than honda's. But shifting is less satisfied than honda's. I guess based on your opinion, this still holds true after so many years I've been driving cars by both manufactures.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: nwng (May 03, 2006 11:00 am) The Fit is not loud at all though at higher speeds...I can say this from experience. Definitely not buzzy. Also, the clutch is very easy and light. I can't say the same for the 2002 Civic I often drive, but the Fit's clutch is wonderful to use and makes driving in rush hour traffic a breeze. |
|
|
Replying to: nwng (May 03, 2006 11:00 am) Sure, it's about 3400-3500 rpm, 80 is ~3900 rpm. xB at same speed is almost identical, 70 is 3500 and 80 is 4000. To be honest, gearing on both is nearly identical if you compare the ratios, but definitely feels different due to the engines and where they make their power. |
|
|
|
|
After reading several posts, the xB does have one cupholder in the rear. Thats where the cell phone goes in mine. Mine also has plenty of power, its in the 9's for 0-60 with a manual. If I would like to go faster in the same test, I can drive my Tundra with its V8. Otherwise, the xB is not a sports coupe like a tC. However, I do agree that the xB is NOT a good long distance car. My Tundra and Corolla are much better for the task. |
|
|
Replying to: vivi (May 03, 2006 8:20 am) My xB with manual transmission accelerates strongly. The road test of four "Rebellious Boxes" by Car & Driver put the xB's 0-60 mph time at 9.6 seconds. The 2007 xB will reportedly be the same as the 2006. The 2008 xB will reportedly be changed from the present Echo platform to the larger Corolla platform. It will be res-styled, larger, more powerful and more expensive. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Honda Fit
Honda Fit v. Scion xB
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Fit
2010 Scion xB



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic