Sign In Join 



Honda Fit v. Hyundai Accent

239 messages,  Last post on Aug 22, 2008 at 9:47 AM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Hyundai Accent, Hatchback


Messages Page 22 of 24
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#210 of 239
Re: CR Article [germancarfan1] by snakeweasel
Nov 03, 2006 (11:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: germancarfan1 (Nov 03, 2006 11:24 am)

They didn't pay off CR? (did I say that? )
#211 of 239
Re: CR Article [germancarfan1] by bobw3
Nov 03, 2006 (11:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: germancarfan1 (Nov 03, 2006 11:24 am)

I don't remember everything from my quick read, but it seemed like it was on the driving characteristics, handling, braking, etc, and on road noise, interior space, and reliability.
#212 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by backy
Nov 03, 2006 (11:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 11:39 am)

Reliability doesn't factor into CR's rankings of one car vs. another. It does factor into whether CR recommends the car.
#213 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by germancarfan1
Nov 03, 2006 (11:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 11:39 am)

"I don't remember everything from my quick read, but it seemed like it was on the driving characteristics, handling, braking, etc, and on road noise, interior space, and reliability."
 
That about covers everything. So, they pretty much disliked the cars?
#214 of 239
Re: CR Article [backy] by bobw3
Nov 03, 2006 (11:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Nov 03, 2006 11:41 am)

Okay, I'm not too sure. I just remember from my quick read that they commented on the reliability, but there were actual points for the rankings but I'm not sure exactly how that's calculated. Too bad you can't just go online and pull down the CR report for free...anyone here have a userid/logon?
 
I like to read the narratives because sometimes they'll point out things that they consider bad, but that I don't. Or they'll mention things you might not think about. And then I do like looking at the actual mpg, braking, handling and other more objective stats, again just to compare, but if you have 4 cars that all handle great, just because one is slightly better it doesn't matter so much, but at least you can see the real dogs.
#215 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by backy
Nov 03, 2006 (11:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 11:45 am)

My local stores don't have the December issue yet. Should have it out in a day or so.
#216 of 239
Re: CR Article [backy] by fitluver
Nov 03, 2006 (8:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Nov 03, 2006 11:47 am)

My local stores don't have the December issue yet. Should have it out in a day or so.
 
Maybe if I am lucky, mine will be in my mailbox tomorrow.
#217 of 239
Re: CR Article [fitluver] by backy
Nov 06, 2006 (9:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: fitluver (Nov 03, 2006 8:54 pm)

I finally found a store with the December issue today. The Fit and Accent were pretty close with automatics, just two points separated them. But it was a runaway for the Fit with the MT-equipped cars, with a score 20 points higher than the next car in the B class, the xB. (The Focus ZX3 was tossed in also, and was 2nd in the MT ratings behind the Fit, but CR admits it's in the next class up.) I put my overall impressions of the review in the Low-End cars discussion, since more than the Fit and Accent are discussed:
 
backy, "Low End Sedans (under $16k)" #3704, 6 Nov 2006 9:17 am
#218 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by herotakesafall
Nov 06, 2006 (9:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 10:54 am)

First, reliability does NOT factor into Consumer Reports' final score. It's a completely separate component that figures into whether or not they recommend the car.
Next, the Fit Sport isn't any different mechanically than the base Fit. The only reason the manual Sport got a higher score than the auto base was because they really like the manual tranny in the Civic (and it gave it respectable acceleration figures).
Next, the Rio and Accent scored extremely well, especially compared to the Yaris. The reason the manual versions scored lower is because CR will dock a car roughly 10 points if they don't buy it with ABS. For anyone who hasn't read the article, here are the scores:
Versa CVT - 65
Fit Auto - 64
Rio Auto - 63
Accent Auto - 62
So the four of them essentially tied. I wish they would have tested the Accent SE, though. There's no question the improved handling would have bumped it up a few points, probably to win the whole comparison.
#219 of 239
Re: CR Article [herotakesafall] by bobw3
Nov 06, 2006 (9:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: herotakesafall (Nov 06, 2006 9:45 am)

If they tested a Fit sport auto instead of a Fit base auto, the Fit would have handled and braked better with the larger tires, so that, plus the additional internal features (cruise, paddle shifters, etc) might have put the Fit auto at the #1 spot, maybe by a wide margin like the manual.
 
I think they should have tested each car in the fully loaded version (auto and every option) and then each car in the stripped out version. Now we can only speculate.

Messages Page 22 of 24
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement