Sign In Join 



Honda Fit v. Hyundai Accent

239 messages,  Last post on Aug 22, 2008 at 9:47 AM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Hyundai Accent, Hatchback


Messages Page 22 of 25
1
...
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#206 of 239
CR Article by bobw3
Nov 03, 2006 (10:54 am)
Reply
The CR December issue puts the Fit on top in the manual/sport version and in second place to the Versa in the auto/base version. I wonder if they compared the auto/sport version to the CVT Versa version that the Fit might have been in the #1 position in both categories. Note that the Versa in the manual version was in 4th place.
 
The deciding factors had to do with reliability, handling, mpg, braking, and interior space. Negatives on the Fit were road noise, acceleration with the auto, steering wheel position and lack of height adjustable drivers seat. The Versa had better marks for interior comforts, noise levels, but the driving characteristics were not as good on the Fit.
 
In the Manual category, the Fit was in first place by a pretty wide margin, while in the Auto category, the Versa SL beat out the base Fit auto by only one point.
 
It seems like with other reviews I've read, and based on my own experience, the Fit and Versa are the top two in this category of tall 4dr hatchbacks with good interior room, with the Versa being quieter and with more comforts, and the Honda having better driving characteristics and quality.
 
The Rio, Accent and Yaris were grouped at the bottom for various reasons.
#207 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by backy
Nov 03, 2006 (11:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 10:54 am)

Actually as far as "tall 4-dr hatchbacks", that includes only the Fit, Versa, and Rio5.
 
Since you seem to have the article, can you tell us which versions of the cars were tested, e.g. were both the base and Sport Fits tested? And were both the Accent 4-door and Accent hatch tested--and which hatch? And what was the equipment, including transmissions, on these cars? Thanks.
#208 of 239
Re: CR Article [backy] by bobw3
Nov 03, 2006 (11:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Nov 03, 2006 11:03 am)

I just flipped through the article at lunch in the bookstore, and I only know that they had two categories, Manual and Automatic, and what I said in my previous post was about all I could remember. But they tested the Fit, Versa, Rio, Accent, and Yaris all in both automatic and manual versions. Plus they threw in the Focus 3dr because with discounts, you can get one for the price of these other cars.
#209 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by germancarfan1
Nov 03, 2006 (11:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 10:54 am)

"The Rio, Accent and Yaris were grouped at the bottom for various reasons."
 
What reasons did CR give for rating these cars bottom of the pack?
#210 of 239
Re: CR Article [germancarfan1] by snakeweasel
Nov 03, 2006 (11:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: germancarfan1 (Nov 03, 2006 11:24 am)

They didn't pay off CR? (did I say that? )
#211 of 239
Re: CR Article [germancarfan1] by bobw3
Nov 03, 2006 (11:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: germancarfan1 (Nov 03, 2006 11:24 am)

I don't remember everything from my quick read, but it seemed like it was on the driving characteristics, handling, braking, etc, and on road noise, interior space, and reliability.
#212 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by backy
Nov 03, 2006 (11:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 11:39 am)

Reliability doesn't factor into CR's rankings of one car vs. another. It does factor into whether CR recommends the car.
#213 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by germancarfan1
Nov 03, 2006 (11:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 11:39 am)

"I don't remember everything from my quick read, but it seemed like it was on the driving characteristics, handling, braking, etc, and on road noise, interior space, and reliability."
 
That about covers everything. So, they pretty much disliked the cars?
#214 of 239
Re: CR Article [backy] by bobw3
Nov 03, 2006 (11:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Nov 03, 2006 11:41 am)

Okay, I'm not too sure. I just remember from my quick read that they commented on the reliability, but there were actual points for the rankings but I'm not sure exactly how that's calculated. Too bad you can't just go online and pull down the CR report for free...anyone here have a userid/logon?
 
I like to read the narratives because sometimes they'll point out things that they consider bad, but that I don't. Or they'll mention things you might not think about. And then I do like looking at the actual mpg, braking, handling and other more objective stats, again just to compare, but if you have 4 cars that all handle great, just because one is slightly better it doesn't matter so much, but at least you can see the real dogs.
#215 of 239
Re: CR Article [bobw3] by backy
Nov 03, 2006 (11:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 03, 2006 11:45 am)

My local stores don't have the December issue yet. Should have it out in a day or so.

Messages Page 22 of 25
1
...
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement