You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-9
2007 Mazda CX-9

1120 messages, Last post on Nov 12, 2008 at 2:37 PM
You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
| 2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2007 Chrysler Pacifica | |
|
Here are the color choices for the 2007 Mazda CX-9. Black Cherry Mica Brilliant Black Clear Coat Copper Red Mica Crystal White Galaxy Gray Liquid Platinum Sparkling Black Mica Stormy Blue Mica Also, some preliminary package options: Towing package, rear passenger entertainment system, Bose Audio/ Moon roof package. There will be more, but, that's all I have for now. This vehicle will also be a 2007, possible here early 2007 or late 2006 (December) |
|
| I'm glad to see the tow package. Does anyone have a guess on the probable tow rating? I know the MPV is at 4000-4300 lbs. The CX9 will have a more powerful engine and 6 speed tranny, but will be on a different (Mazda 6) platform. Also, any further info on introduction dates? I'd be very interesting in getting one right now if the tow rating were strong enough...and they were available. | |
|
We want an awd 6-7 passenger vehicle with xenon headlights, decent mileage using regular gas and maybe a full-size, regular spare tire. As best I can determine, only the Pacifica (with a new 4.0 engine and 6-speed transmission,) and the upcoming CX-9 offer this combination. (I am right in assuming the upcoming MDX uses premium, aren't I?) When I test drove a CX-7 I noticed that, even though the spare wasn't a full-service tire, it was a full diameter spare. I'd bet a full -size spare will be available in the CX-9. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: music287 (Jul 09, 2006 4:09 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: quattroporte12 (Jul 12, 2006 7:12 pm) 1) it didn't start at $50,000 (for the v8) 2) it didn't weigh so much (5,300lbs) 3) you live near an audi dealer so you can get it fixed 4) you could fit somebody more than 4ft tall in the 3rd row (head room) Don't get me wrong. The specs look pretty good for it (especially if we could get that diesel), but they are calling for the Ford Edge to get in the mid-20s for average gas mileage, which bodes well for the Mazda since they share the same motor. I could take that money saved from gas mileage and vehicle cost and practically buy another car.
|
|
|
Replying to: arumage (Jul 19, 2006 5:04 am) It looks a lot bigger in person than it looks on the picture. And the two the is consistent throughout the vehicle. The 2 colors you see are the 2 colors available on the Mountaineer -Cj
|
|
|
Replying to: autoboy16 (Jul 19, 2006 9:38 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: arumage (Jul 19, 2006 5:04 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: quattroporte12 (Jul 20, 2006 6:15 pm) Even though the V6 is 280hp, it's still going to be hard pressed to push over 5,000lbs. The new engine from Ford is going to be about 265hp. That engine, which is supposed to be more reliable than its replacement, (The 3.0L V6 came out as a 2.5L V6 in the 1996 Ford Contour) is what Ford is really going to be basing it's whole fleet of cars on. It was created to fit in any vehicle that had the 3.0L V6 in it. The 3rd row headroom is what I'm worried about in the Q7. That big sloping curve over the room certainly makes the vehicle beautiful, but it takes alot of space away from the 3rd row (headroom). That being said. I really love the look of the Audi, inside and out. I also like the tow rating. I know the Ford will probably only tow about 3,500lbs. Lastly, I can't see where the Acadia/Enclave/Outlook will get good gas mileage at all. The 3.6L V6 is the same one in the Cadillac CTS, and it only make 18/27mpg in the CTS. If you add over 1000lbs and make it less aerodynamic, it can only get worse, although I like how they look too.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-9
2007 Mazda CX-9
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-9



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats