Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Mazda CX-9 2007 Mazda CX-9
1120 messages, Last post on Nov 12, 2008 at 2:37 PM
You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: eadlertx (Nov 02, 2007 7:44 pm) Someone in the CR forums did ask a dealer about the CR report, and the only answer was that everything had been taken care of in the 2008 model. To tell the truth, I have scoured the forums looking for this "drive systems" issue, and have found nothing. After doing some digging in the CR website, here is what constitutes "drive systems": Driveshaft or axle, CV joint, wheel bearing(s), differential, transfer case, 4WD/AWD components, driveline vibration, traction control, stability control, electrical failure. Again, searching the web for any of these issues related to the CX-9 comes out empty. The only thing that comes up is the car pulling to the left or right (alignment issue, I think)...maybe some owners lumped that under "drive systems" in the CR survey? |
|
|
I noticed something curious while I was at the dealership a couple of days ago. The window sticker on the 08 Sport said it got 17/24 mpg while the one for the 08 Touring said 16/22. Both were FWD. I asked why and nobody could come up with an answer. Finally one of their showroom guys said that once the EPA came up with their new numbers, Mazda decided to reprogram the drivetrain to get better mileage. Some of the window stickers where produced before the change and some after, which accounts for the difference. He said "not to worry" that they update all the software every time they service the vehicle, including first service, so that the vehicle I bought would have the latest Mazda update. Does this make sense??? By the way the deal they offered was good only for that day, so I walked away. The CX9 is still on my list, but I'm having second thoughts.
|
|
|
Replying to: nxs138 (Nov 02, 2007 6:19 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: cmuniz (Nov 03, 2007 2:48 am) http://www.fueleconomy.gov/ 2008: 16/22 18 combined is listed for FWD. 15/21 17 combined for AWD. Sounds like they simply had a sticker for the old way the EPA used to rate MPG, has nothing to do with reprogram, they are feeding you a load of crap sounds like to me. I love everything about this vehicle except the mpg seems quite poor. B.
|
|
|
Replying to: brutus22 (Nov 03, 2007 6:10 am) Mazda: 15/21 for AWD Acadia: 16/22 for AWD Veracruz: 15/22 for AWD Highlander: 17/23 for AWD Pilot: 15/20 for AWD So the CX-9 is nothing special, but isn't that far off from the others. I'm actually surprised how low the Pilot gets. I guess a hybrid (or diesel) is the only way to get better mpg in this crossover segment...
|
|
|
Replying to: cmuniz (Nov 03, 2007 2:48 am) |
|
|
Replying to: nxs138 (Nov 03, 2007 6:36 am) |
|
|
Replying to: nxs138 (Nov 02, 2007 6:19 pm) I do appreciate sharing what you have found. None of it sounds all that alarming to me. Historically, almost all first year vehicles experience some 'bugs' that need to be worked out. And it sounds like these 'bugs' were annoying but nothing that proved to be too major. We're going for our last test drive right now. I will try not to put too much emphasis on the CR article and let the experience drive my decision. Thanks again to all who responded! 
|
|
|
Replying to: pulleydog (Nov 03, 2007 7:25 am) |
|
|
Replying to: pulleydog (Nov 03, 2007 7:25 am) Good luck! My wife and I enjoyed the CX-9 test drive, we liked it better than the Acadia or Highlander. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Mazda CX-9 2007 Mazda CX-9
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-9
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
