Ford Mustang Fox Body 79-93

49 messages,  Last post on Apr 01, 2012 at 1:19 PM

You are in the Ford Mustang Forum.

What is this discussion about? Ford Mustang

#1 of 49 FoxBodyStang79-93 by 82boss

Apr 01, 2006 (11:02 pm)

For All Fox Body Stang's 5.0 Performance

#3 of 49 Re: FoxBodyStang79-93 [82boss] by 82boss

Apr 01, 2006 (11:06 pm)

Replying to: 82boss (Apr 01, 2006 11:02 pm)
I was just wondering if anyone has built or had a stroker motor built for they're car because I have a few question's

#4 of 49 Re: FoxBodyStang79-93 [82boss] by stangonly

Apr 24, 2006 (3:08 pm)

Replying to: 82boss (Apr 01, 2006 11:06 pm)
yea i have a stroker moter in my 87 stang

#5 of 49 Re: FoxBodyStang79-93 [82boss] by claires HOST

Apr 24, 2006 (9:22 pm)

Replying to: 82boss (Apr 01, 2006 11:06 pm)
82boss, not sure if you've visited our Speed Shop: Tuning & Modification Forum -- you might get some answers to your questions there, too.

#6 of 49 1992 LX Hatchback - Restore or Sell? by tibbi

May 10, 2006 (5:33 pm)

I am the second owner of a '92 LX 2.3 ltr, 5 spd manual, 65K miles and am wondering if I should restore it or sell it? It's in super condition inside with no rusted out spots but has some passanger door damage (hubby backed into it ). Since the car is so sound mechanically and for the most part body-wise, I'd like opinions on whether or not it would have any value as a restored car to keep for show or if I should just sell it . I don't drive it and it's still garaged, but I am uncertain as to which avenue to take. I appreciate any advice you all could provide - thanks for any response!

#7 of 49 Re: 1992 LX Hatchback - Restore or Sell? [tibbi] by john_324

May 11, 2006 (12:30 pm)

Replying to: tibbi (May 10, 2006 5:33 pm)
4cyl Mustangs aren't really worth restoring for show, unless they're the rare mid-80s turbo models.
 
Only reason to restore would be for your use (i.e. if it were a car to which you're really attached and want to keep driving). But since it seems it's not, I'd say sell it. Get yourself a '06 Mustang!

#8 of 49 Re: 1992 LX Hatchback - Restore or Sell? [john_324] by tibbi

May 11, 2006 (7:08 pm)

Replying to: john_324 (May 11, 2006 12:30 pm)
Thanks John and I'm not that attached to it, except for the fact it gets better milage than anything else I own and it's in such good shape I almost hate to drive it :0. Appreciate your advice and I'll take it to heart! Now my former 'Stang, a '67 fastback, I should have restored but hindsight is so good isn't it?

#9 of 49 Please Keep your 1992 Mustang LX Hatchback by gtgtcobra

May 11, 2006 (7:24 pm)

If I were you, I would keep the 1992 Mustang LX 4 cylinder hatchback. Even if you are not attached to it, if it's in good condition, you should keep it and just drive it. It's economical and you don't have a car payment. These are 2 things which you should take into consideration. If there's nothing wrong with your 92 Mustang LX, keep it and drive it. You may want to take it to Maaco and have the door fixed and the car repainted for a few hundred dollars. Then your 92 LX will look like brand new and you can keep driving it like a new car and have excellent fuel economy with it and NO car payments. That's what I would do.
Take my advice. Keep it!

#10 of 49 Re: Please Keep your 1992 Mustang LX Hatchback [gtgtcobra] by tibbi

May 11, 2006 (8:47 pm)

Replying to: gtgtcobra (May 11, 2006 7:24 pm)
gtgtcobra,
Thanks for the advice - it really is economical and with the price of gas these days it makes a lot of sense!
Tibbi
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement