Sign In Join 



Plug-in Hybrids - READ ONLY

330 messages,  Last post on Nov 13, 2008 at 12:13 PM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Toyota Highlander Hybrid, Honda Civic, Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 4 of 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
33
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 330
Re: advantages [kneisl1] by tpe
May 25, 2006 (10:33 am)

Replying to: kneisl1 (May 25, 2006 9:19 am)

Well price could be the most important thing! The standard range for an acid battery car is 30-40 miles at 25-30 mph. What performance do the other battereies give?
 
The EV1, RAV4 EV, and Nissan Altria could all go 100+ miles on a charge. They also weren't limited to speeds of 25-30 mph. In fact, there were some specially designed EV1s that posted very impressive top speeds well over 100 mph. The RAV4 EV was governed to an 80 mph max. Although I'm certain that they didn't get anywhere near their best range at these speeds. I believe that by the end of their production these all had NiMH batteries.
#32 of 330
batteries by kneisl1
May 25, 2006 (12:48 pm)
Yes thats usually the way it is. They get 100 miles per charge, but not at any speed. Since I almost never drive more than 5 miles and dont need to go over 30 I could use an electric car. If it was cheap enough.
#33 of 330
Re: batteries [kneisl1] by tpe
May 25, 2006 (1:28 pm)

Replying to: kneisl1 (May 25, 2006 12:48 pm)

If gas prices stay high I suspect you will see a lot of EV options within the next few years. Whether or not they'll be cheap is another matter. I read that the EV1 didn't comply with NHTSA safety regulations and that was one of the reasons GM cited for killing it. I don't completely believe that. If Honda can make the Insight street legal why couldn't GM do the same with the EV1. Regardless, its a two seater and its got to be safer than riding a motorcycle with a passenger on the back and that's perfectly legal. I'm not entirely sure what rational our government uses for making certain small cars illegal. It makes you wonder if they have a hidden agenda?
#34 of 330
legal by kneisl1
May 25, 2006 (1:56 pm)
Ho boy that could be a big problem I didnt think of. Shoot. Looks like no electric car for me.
#35 of 330
battery technology by tpe
May 26, 2006 (3:58 am)
Electro Energy Inc. is a relatively new, small company with a patented bi-polar design for NiMH batteries. According to the company this design provides 50% more power, 30% less volume and is 35% cheaper to manufacture. Their plans are to produce large format batteries of this type specifically for the PHEV and EV market. All sounds good and promising. Maybe. There are a lot of people that seem to know what they're talking about saying that as soon as they go into production they can expect to be sued by Cobasys, i.e. Chevron. If that happens it will be a shame.
 
http://money.cnn.com/services/tickerheadlines/prn/200605250842PR_NEWS_USPR_____N- YTH042.htm
#36 of 330
Re: battery technology [tpe] by gagrice
May 26, 2006 (8:05 am)

Replying to: tpe (May 26, 2006 3:58 am)

they can expect to be sued by Cobasys
 
I think it is a little more involved than Chevron. They may have added needed capitol. During the R&D phase of the EV-1 in the early 1990s there was a company formed to develop batteries. That company was GM Ovonics. I am not sure how much GM still owns. All the NiMH patents are still held by Ovonics while Cobasys is a manufacturing partner. I can understand Ovonics wanting a piece of every battery sold. That is what patents are there for. I don't know if Chevron owns a share of ECD Ovonics (ener).
 
Check out their hydrogen powered Prius.
 
Recently, Ovonic Hydrogen Systems demonstrated its new hydrogen hybrid vehicle. Utilizing OvonicŪ Solid Hydrogen Storage, a driving range of nearly 200 miles is achievable on a single hydrogen fill-up. The hydrogen hybrid accelerates and performs similar to the commercially available gasoline version, but with significantly lower emissions.
 
http://www.ovonic.com/
#37 of 330
Re: battery technology [gagrice] by tpe
May 26, 2006 (8:48 am)

Replying to: gagrice (May 26, 2006 8:05 am)

I can understand Ovonics wanting a piece of every battery sold.
 
I can understand that too. What I don't understand is when Ovonics precludes these battery manufacturers from producing large format batteries, the kind most suitable for EVs. Electro Energy has a website with a technical paper regarding the NiMH batteries that they plan on producing.
 
http://www.electroenergyinc.com/products/technicalpapers/BipolarNickel.pdf
 
They state that they can produce large format batteries between 500 Wh and 2 kWh for a retail cost of $300 per kWh. That is very good. That would mean the 26 kWh battery pack on the RAV4 EV could be replaced for $7,800 instead of $26,000. Still expensive but easily recouped through gas savings and other reduced maintenance if the batteries last at least 50,000 miles. So Ovonics wants a cut of this. I think Panasonic is giving them 3% royalties on the batteries it produces for Toyota's Prius. That's fine, I agree it's fair. Hell, make it a 10% royalty, still no big deal. What I think will happen is that Electro Energy Inc. flat out won't be allowed to manufacture these large format batteries for propulsion purposes. If that ends up being the case I'd like to understand the rational behind it.
 
GM sold its 50% share of Ovonics to Chevron. Chevron later changed the name of this subsidiary to Cobasys.
#38 of 330
Re: battery technology [tpe] by gagrice
May 26, 2006 (9:51 am)

Replying to: tpe (May 26, 2006 8:48 am)

I'd like to understand the rational behind it.
 
I would like to know also. Be sure and post if you see anything like that come about. I wondered what happened to GM and the NiMH batteries. I guess they needed the cash more than future profits. The thing is Lithium Ion could kill the NiMH battery business in short order, just as capacitors could be the next break through. It is all a gamble.
#39 of 330
Re: battery technology [gagrice] by tpe
May 26, 2006 (10:55 am)

Replying to: gagrice (May 26, 2006 9:51 am)

GM sold its 50% stake in Ovonics for $160 million. Right now the market cap for Ovonics (ENER) is $1.3 billion. Seems like GM should have held on to it.
#40 of 330
Re: battery technology [tpe] by gagrice
May 26, 2006 (2:12 pm)

Replying to: tpe (May 26, 2006 10:55 am)

GM has bleeding down well.... Now we know the rest of the story. Now they are buying batteries from Cobasys for the VUE hybrid.

Messages Page 4 of 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
33
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement