Sign In Join 



Plug-in Hybrids - READ ONLY

330 messages,  Last post on Nov 13, 2008 at 12:13 PM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Toyota Highlander Hybrid, Honda Civic, Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 30 of 34
1
...
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#289 of 330
Re: 'Yota trying to beat the Volt to market? [gagrice] by tpe
Jun 18, 2008 (9:57 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 11, 2008 5:32 pm)

For me, I will not live to be old enough to feel comfortable with any Lithium Ion hybrid in my garage.
 
Yet you are comfortable with a Li-ion laptop in your house. If your concerned about a fire I'm sure the battery pack in a laptop is big enough to get the job done.
#290 of 330
Re: 'Yota trying to beat the Volt to market? [tpe] by gagrice
Jun 18, 2008 (10:18 am)

Replying to: tpe (Jun 18, 2008 9:57 am)

I don't leave it plugged in over night. I also check all the recalls from Dell. The Li-Ion is a big disappointment in laptop longevity also. There is also a difference between 6 -12 cells and 6000+ cells in a car. The odds on one overheating is much greater with the bigger pack. My laptop does not require an AC unit to keep the batteries cool. What happens when it is like today 100 degrees and the car is out in the sun plugged in to get charged up? I am sure they will give it a good test out in the desert.
#291 of 330
Re: 'Yota trying to beat the Volt to market? [gagrice] by tpe
Jun 18, 2008 (10:57 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 18, 2008 10:18 am)

To my knowledge Tesla is the only known EV manufacturer that is stringing together thousands of laptop batteries. I personally don't think it was/is a good idea and believe it is one of several things Tesla would do differently if they could turn back the clock a few years. These other manufacturers are using fewer but larger format cells that implement multiple layers of safeguards. Even my cell phone is smart enough to power down if it is too hot. I know this because I've left it in my car on a hot day. Of all the question marks surrounding Li-ion batteries for vehicles I believe that the engineers have succeeded in making safety a non-issue.
#292 of 330
Re: 'Yota trying to beat the Volt to market? [tpe] by gagrice
Jun 18, 2008 (8:17 pm)

Replying to: tpe (Jun 18, 2008 10:57 am)

If as you say they have beat the heat issue with Lithium batteries, that only leaves longevity. That was my worry about buying a NiMH vehicle. Even more so on a car with Li-Ion batteries. If they warranty the batteries for 10 years it would help make the decision for me.
#293 of 330
Re: 'Yota trying to beat the Volt to market? [gagrice] by tpe
Jun 19, 2008 (6:22 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 18, 2008 8:17 pm)

In my mind the only question surrounding Li-ion is longevity in terms of calendar age. There is probably no 100% definitive way to know how a battery will perform 10 years down the road until they've been in service for 10 years. Longevity in terms of number of cycles that these batteries can be charged/discharged has been established and is superior to NiMH. Another nice thing about Li-ion batteries is their extremely low self discharge rate compared to other battery types. You don't want your battery pack discharging while it's sitting in a parking lot. That would be comparable to having a small leak in a gas tank.
#294 of 330
Re: Even at a 'YOTA DEALERSHIP now !!! [larsb] by reddroverr
Jun 19, 2008 (8:32 am)

Replying to: larsb (Jun 16, 2008 12:15 pm)

looks like you get ~100 mpg for the first 30-40 miles vs the..what..40-50 mpg (guess) for your old prius.
 
probably raise the value of your used car by $5k at least, maybe more...(another guess).
 
a new replacement prius would cost you well over twice the 10k.
 
pretty close to making sense even on a pure economic basis.
 
No wonder Toyota doesn't like it one bit.
#295 of 330
Re: 'Yota trying to beat the Volt to market? [tpe] by stevedebi
Jun 19, 2008 (5:25 pm)

Replying to: tpe (Jun 19, 2008 6:22 am)

"Longevity in terms of number of cycles that these batteries can be charged/discharged has been established and is superior to NiMH."
 
Can you supply a URL? I know that for laptop batteries, they are only good for about 500 cycles, and they work best when they are almost, but not completely, discharged before recharging. At least that is my experience with Li-Ion batteries.
#296 of 330
Re: 'Yota trying to beat the Volt to market? [stevedebi] by tpe
Jun 19, 2008 (6:35 pm)

Replying to: stevedebi (Jun 19, 2008 5:25 pm)

Can you supply a URL? I know that for laptop batteries, they are only good for about 500 cycles,
 
I'll track down a reference. I know that the A123 Systems batteries being considered by GM have been tested through thousands of charge/discharge cycles.
 
This 500 cycle limit might be true for laptop batteries. What people need to realize is that the chemistries being used in Li-ion battery packs designed for vehicle applications is fundamentally different from what's now being used in laptop batteries. Even though I suspect today's laptop batteries last longer than they did a couple years ago.
#297 of 330
PHEV fire by larsb
Jun 25, 2008 (2:03 pm)
I know Gary is going to say, "see SEE SEE but I'm posting it anyway, for informational purposes ONLY.
 
Battery not at fault
 
Even though neither of these fires apparently were caused by lithium-ion batteries, the news is likely to raise some concern about plug-in hybrids from consumers and automakers, said Mike Omotoso, senior manager of global powertrain research at JD Power and Associates.
 
“This shows [companies] need more time for testing the viability of these vehicles before they can be commercialized,” he said. “This is a good example of why some manufacturers, like Honda, have been holding off on making plug-in hybrids. It’s clear it’s not just as simple as connecting a cable to your battery and plugging it into your wall. If that were the case, it would have been done by the major manufacturers already.”
 
He emphasized that these fires don’t necessarily mean that plug-in hybrids are unsafe, but said they could raise the perception of a safety issue, which could impact their commercialization.
 
“There’s a difference between someone doing an after-market conversion in a garage, versus a manufacturer making a plug-in hybrid from the get-go,” he said. “If there are more of these examples, even if it’s just some guy in a garage, people will think, ‘Maybe plug-in hybrids aren’t the way to go because they are too unsafe.’ ”
 
In a newsletter released Wednesday night, CalCars.org indicated similar concerns.
 
“For several years, some opinion leaders from automakers, utilities and national labs have expressed their fears that ‘one bad accident’ could set back the progress of [plug-in hybrids],” CalCars.org founder Felix Kramer wrote. “We have agreed that safety must be top priority. … We hope that this and other incidents will lead to far greater emphasis on safety as well as full and rapid disclosure of incidents.”
 
He added that the nonprofit is aware that conversions by small companies and individuals never could be as well-designed as those by large carmakers, which is why it has encouraged automakers to bring plug-in hybrids to the market more quickly.
 
“The fact that carmakers can build better and safer PHEVs is self-evident, but the demand is so great that individuals and companies continue to bang down the doors of the suppliers of conversions,” he said. “We’re all impatient for the great transition to electrification of transportation to begin. The longer we have to wait, the larger will be the trend toward third-party conversions, for better or for worse.”
 
Still, he argued, it’s important to keep the danger in perspective. After all, the cars we already drive every day use a highly explosive fuel that could be set off by a stray spark or catch fire in accidents, he wrote.
#298 of 330
Re: PHEV fire [larsb] by gagrice
Jun 25, 2008 (2:41 pm)

Replying to: larsb (Jun 25, 2008 2:03 pm)

Gary is going to say, "see SEE SEE but I'm posting it anyway, for informational purposes ONLY.
 
Just what is the problem? I did not see any explanation only spin about gas being dangerous. Well I agree and would prefer diesel as it is MUCH safer than gas or hybrids.
 
Boulder, Colo.-based Hybrids Plus has advised all of its conversion owners to stop driving the vehicles until further information is available. According to the press release, forensic examinations have not been able to conclusively identify the cause of the fire, but established that the battery cells – which, according to plug-in advocacy group CalCars.org came from A123Systems – were not the reason.
 
The company said it has begun inspecting and upgrading all of its systems to eliminate potential concerns, and would upgrade all its customers’ systems for free.
 
It isn’t the first instance of fires in conversions.
 
CalCars last month reported a failure that resulted in a meltdown of the original nickel-metal-hydride battery in the world’s first Prius plug-in hybrid conversion.

 
Ok, let me get this straight. I take my $30k Prius and have it modified to a PHEV for an additional $25k plus and it is not to be driven. My advice don't park it or any other hybrid in your garage unless you are trying to get out of your mortgage. From the article a quite a few of these experiments have gone sour.
 
If they are upgrading free of charge would that not indicate they know what the problem is?

Messages Page 30 of 34
1
...
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement