Sign In Join 



Will ethanol E85 catch on in the US? Will we Live Green and Go Yellow? - READ ONLY

2104 messages,  Last post on Oct 27, 2006 at 5:34 AM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Chrysler, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mercury, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Monte Carlo, Chevrolet Avalanche, Alternative Fuels, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 91 of 211
1
...
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
...
211
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#896 of 2104
Re: E85 - for free if you buy a Ford product [fireball1] by seniorjose
Jun 15, 2006 (3:48 pm)

Replying to: fireball1 (Jun 15, 2006 3:38 pm)

Mid-Nebraska, today: Regular unleaded, $2.79 a gallon; E-10, $2.85. Add in the mileage efficiency differences, and I can't see how anyone would fill 'er up with E-10 in this neck of the woods.
 
I filled up today here in Cedar Rapids, Iowa at $2.69 a gallon for E10 89 Octane. 87 octane gasoline was $2.79. Just think of it as kicking the oil cartel dictators in the rump! Drivers don't neeed to be "won over."
#897 of 2104
Re: Coal fired ...and for the rest of the Coal story! [seniorjose] by gagrice
Jun 15, 2006 (3:54 pm)

Replying to: seniorjose (Jun 15, 2006 3:09 pm)

"It just made great economic sense to use coal,"
 
I really was not preaching to you, it was to the church of Zero Emissions. Coal is not horrible compared to years back. To some it is bad news. To anyone that thinks a car should be PZEV or banned it is a disaster to use coal for anything other than a Christmas stocking.
 
You probably don't care if they use bunker oil to fire the furnaces of the ethanol stills. I would be surprised if this does not put all the out of business bootleggers back to work.
#898 of 2104
Re: Coal fired ...and for the rest of the Coal story! [fireball1] by seniorjose
Jun 15, 2006 (3:58 pm)

Replying to: fireball1 (Jun 15, 2006 3:33 pm)

The last I heard, there was no such thing aS "clean coal" technology. The stuff is flat-out dirty.
 
Clean coal technology has been around since the 1960s -- if you build the scrubbers in like almost all regulations state. I watched the local (New Jersey) Owens Corning plant shift from no scrubbers in 1964. From being a terrible "smokestack" industry, it was turned into a very good neighbor with no particles in the air. the difference is dramatic and since it is an old technolgy by now, it can work. The coal smokestacks that belch like the steel plants of turn-of-the-century Pittsburg steel mills is long gone into history.
#899 of 2104
Re: E85 - for free if you buy a Ford product [fireball1] by lmyers92123
Jun 15, 2006 (3:59 pm)

Replying to: fireball1 (Jun 15, 2006 3:38 pm)

I thought E10 was the new standard fuel? They replaced 10%MTBE with 10%ethanol. Maybe it's just another CA only piece of legislation but I though it was national. E85 would be a completely different mix.
 
There is a lot of opinion and passion in this thread..that is good. I guess as long as we move from foreign oil dependence and being held over the barrel by oil companies that is good. I hope we put out many alternative fuels and break the cycle. Competition, in general, is great for the consumer.
#900 of 2104
E10 gets you more bang for the buck -- NOW by seniorjose
Jun 15, 2006 (4:11 pm)
American Coalition for Ethanol Releases Results of Fuel Economy Study
 
Sioux Falls, SD (August 24, 2005) – The American Coalition for Ethanol (ACE) today released the results of its recent Fuel Economy Study, a pilot study that researched the fuel economy, cost per mile, and driveability of various blends of fuel, including unleaded gasoline, E10, E20, and E30.
 
“As ethanol production and use continues to expand from coast to coast, increased public discussion and media attention have often turned to a debate over ethanol's fuel efficiency,” said Ron Lamberty, ACE Vice President / Market Development. “Because there was very little scientific information out there, ACE commissioned a pilot study to determine whether there are variances in gas mileage between ethanol blends and gasoline.”
 
The research tested unleaded gasoline, a 10% ethanol blend (E10), a 20% ethanol blend (E20), and a 30% ethanol blend (E30) in three late-model vehicles. The Chevrolet Impala, Ford Taurus, and Toyota Camry were not flexible fuel vehicles, and no modifications were made to them for this research. Care was taken to eliminate any human inputs that might render the tests unscientific, including the use of a computerized data logger and strict controls on the vehicles, fuel, and terrain.
 
The test was conducted by Allen Kasperson, a Fuel Research Specialist and instructor with more than 30 years of experience training automobile and truck technicians at Lake Area Vocational Technical Institute in Watertown, South Dakota. The study also examined an E10 blend that had been denatured with iso-pentane and soy biodiesel, a denaturant combination that Kasperson had studied and found to have lowered the fuel's reid vapor pressure (RVP). While the RVP tests in this study were inconclusive, the blend did perform better than unleaded in most tests.
 
Read full results of the study
Miles per gallon
The three vehicles averaged only 1.5% lower mileage with E10, 2.2% lower mileage with E20, 5.1% lower mileage with E30, and increased mileage of 1.7% when using the specially denatured E10 blend.
 
Cost per mile
Although the MPG of ethanol blends was slightly lower than the unleaded, the cost per mile of operation was generally lower. Also, the higher the concentrations of ethanol, the lower the cost per mile. Using the study's average MPG, E10 is less expensive per mile than unleaded until ethanol's cost is nearly 30 cents above unleaded. On a $20 bill, drivers can travel up to 15 miles farther on ethanol-blended fuel than on straight unleaded.
 
Driveability
Contrary to statements commonly made by vehicle manufacturers and technicians, no warning lights were displayed at any time while operating on any of the fuel blends. The data logger used for the research monitored all systems and detected no malfunction indicator lights (MIL), diagnostic trouble code lights (DTC), or emissions DTCs.
 
Also, it has been assumed that in older model vehicles the oxygen sensor could not recognize fuel with ethanol content higher than 10% and therefore caused a malfunction indicator light to be displayed. In all vehicles used, the car's computer seemed to have the ability to adjust the air/fuel ratio normally with ethanol blends even beyond the standard 10%.
 
The study cautioned that motorists should not use fuel with concentrations of ethanol higher than those recommended by the vehicles' manufacturers, but called for more research to determine if those fuels should be approved for use in standard, non flexible fuel vehicles.
 
“If drivers want to save money at the pump as gas prices reach new record highs, this pilot study confirms that ethanol is the fuel of choice,” said Brian Jennings, ACE Executive Vice President. “Using ethanol is like money in your pocket, and you feel good about filling up on this homegrown fuel because it comes from America's farm fields, not the oil fields of the Middle East.”
 
“The bottom line is that, in addition to offering higher performance and lower emissions, ethanol-blended fuel is easier on the pocketbooks of American motorists,” Lamberty said.
#901 of 2104
How about E85's bank for the buck? by lmyers92123
Jun 15, 2006 (4:28 pm)
This is the link from seniorjose's post.
 
http://www.ethanol.org/
 
Why did they do E10-E30 in non FFV vehicles and not compare costs per mile of E85 in FFV's? I'm always wary of information provided by "unbiased" sources on a lobbing website.
#902 of 2104
Re: How about E85's bank for the buck? [lmyers92123] by gagrice
Jun 15, 2006 (4:51 pm)

Replying to: lmyers92123 (Jun 15, 2006 4:28 pm)

I'm always wary of information provided by "unbiased" sources on a lobbying website.
 
Maybe that is where the good news about ethanol resides. We have actually strayed from the original topic. That is as you have mentioned E85 is the subject on the thread. And whether it is good for the country made from Corn (yellow). I'm sure if they had tested a FFV with E85 it would not have looked real good for the guys selling this boondoggle. So they go with mixtures that would void your auto warranty using anything stronger than E10. I actually am not anti ethanol. I am anti mandate and mega farmer.
 
As this report indicates less corn will be available next year. That drives the price of ethanol above the current $3.50 per gallon. If we are only worried about the guy with the FFV no big deal he can buy regular gas and tell ADM to buzz off. With the E7-E10 mandate for all regular unleaded. It will drive all gas prices even higher.
 
With the 3.8 million acre decline in plantings that was indicated in the March intentions, a trend U.S. corn yield would produce a crop about 900 million bushels below potential 2006-07 utilization
 
Iowa corn projection
#903 of 2104
Re: E85 - for free if you buy a Ford product [lmyers92123] by tpe
Jun 15, 2006 (4:54 pm)

Replying to: lmyers92123 (Jun 15, 2006 3:59 pm)

I thought E10 was the new standard fuel?
 
That's impossible since the amount of ethanol produced only accounts for 3-4% of our fuel consumption. E10 has significance in that all gasoline burning cars can use E10 without voiding their warranties. I suspect that every gasoline burning car could also run on E85. Its just at some point the corrosive nature of ethanol would eventually cause problems for those vehicles not designed for this fuel.
 
I hope we put out many alternative fuels and break the cycle. Competition, in general, is great for the consumer.
 
I agree. We all want energy independence. Allow the market some say in what is the best approach. Minimize politics. Ethanol cannot be separated from politics.
#904 of 2104
OPEC concern by tpe
Jun 15, 2006 (5:10 pm)
I recently read an article expressing that OPEC is concerned with the current emphasis on exploring alternative fuels. They feel like a price of 50-55 dollars per barrel would be consistent with their interests of maximizing profit and perpetuating oil economies. I'm not sure what this has to do with the ethanol discussion, but I find it interesting. Specifically its the fact that although OPEC would like for oil prices to be cheaper they are no longer in the position to make it happen. To me that is an indication of a system that is strained very close to capacity. I personally hope that gas prices stay high because I welcome the increased R&D into alternatives that it has spurred.
#905 of 2104
Re: E85 - for free if you buy a Ford product [tpe] by lmyers92123
Jun 15, 2006 (5:48 pm)

Replying to: tpe (Jun 15, 2006 4:54 pm)

I stand corrected by tpe. I mixed cars built currently to run on 10% ethanol without damaging effects with E10.

Messages Page 91 of 211
1
...
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
...
211
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement