Sign In Join 



Will ethanol E85 catch on in the US? Will we Live Green and Go Yellow? - READ ONLY

2104 messages,  Last post on Oct 27, 2006 at 5:34 AM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Chrysler, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mercury, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Monte Carlo, Chevrolet Avalanche, Alternative Fuels, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 57 of 211
1
...
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
...
211
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#556 of 2104
E85 is still the Answer - NOW by seniorjose
Jun 05, 2006 (8:40 am)
NEVC - Jefferson City, MO – E85 refueling locations have more than doubled in the past year, making more availability for the almost six million compatible vehicles on American roads. Unfortunately, the price at the pump has not been the most attractive in recent months.
 
When using E85 in a flexible-fuel vehicle, one will receive a 5 to 12 percent mileage reduction than when using unleaded gasoline in the same vehicle. This reason is simple – E85 contains less energy, lower British Thermal Units (BTUs) than regular unleaded gasoline. Thus, to be advantageous for a consumer, the price of E85 must be lower than that of regular unleaded gasoline. Unfortunately, at this time, the price of E85 is sometimes higher than regular unleaded at many refueling locations.
 
What are the factors that are resulting in these high E85 prices? One of the main reasons is that ethanol demand has recently been at an all-time high. The reasons for this unprecedented demand of ethanol is the phase out of MTBE in parts of the United States and continued reductions in refining capacity. The hurricanes that hit the Gulf Coast in late 2005 created a gasoline shortage throughout the country and in some cases, refinery supplies are still being impacted. Major gasoline retailers needed to extend their fuel supplies, and adding a small percentage of ethanol to their gasoline blend was a short term answer.
 
Most persons associated with the industry indicate believe that the high cost of E85 is short term. “The price [of E85] is higher but it is being driven by market forces due to a short term market shortage.
#557 of 2104
Re: E85 is still the Answer - NOW [seniorjose] by gagrice
Jun 05, 2006 (1:57 pm)

Replying to: seniorjose (Jun 05, 2006 8:40 am)

What are the factors that are resulting in these high E85 prices?
 
No sniveling about the high price of corn ethanol. Did I say, I told you so? I hope you continue to support and run E85 in your vehicle when the price continues to rise. If not I would say that borders on hypocrisy.
#558 of 2104
Re: E85 dispenser - NOW [seniorjose] by gridflash
Jun 05, 2006 (2:36 pm)

Replying to: seniorjose (Jun 05, 2006 7:37 am)

Good post.
It's surprising that it's taken this long to get an Industry-Approved E85 fuel dispenser.
 
It's too bad that they aren't publicly traded. Cause we are going to need a lot of them.
#559 of 2104
Re: E85 is still the Answer - NOW [gagrice] by seniorjose
Jun 06, 2006 (6:52 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 05, 2006 1:57 pm)

Removing the influence of the oil cartel or at least dissipating it is our national goal. South America and now Iran are threatening to cut off the oil spigot...this terrorist blackmail has to stop!
 
It is hilarious to see even our USA TREE-HUGRs scramble, whine and ineptly try to denigrate renewable resources such as Ethanol and Biodeisal. Of course Hydrogen powered autos are decades away from being practical, just as Electric autos have been phased out as impractical so far.
E95 and Biodeisal will allow us to push diesels technology NOW! Of course E85 continues to impact auto sales NOW.
 
Ford currently is running a new ad that is advertising their E85 capable F150 as having NO price increase over 100% gasoline models. Good advertising...shows a stalk of green corn slowly turning into an E85 green corn like hose that is fueling a bright red F150...and the beat goes on...NOW! Like Mikey..."Buy it, you'll like it."
#560 of 2104
Re: E85 is still the Answer - NOW [seniorjose] by gagrice
Jun 06, 2006 (7:03 am)

Replying to: seniorjose (Jun 06, 2006 6:52 am)

You and I may be closer together than you think. First though I am not worried about oil being shut off from Iran. They have crap oil with real high sulfur that no one wants. That may cause them to use their big guns to take over other Middle East countries. That could be problematic. South American oil is much more stable. They talk a lot but love our money. They have horrible leaders, but not ones that have a religious fervor of hatred toward the USA.
 
It is good that Ford and GM are offering FFVs for those that have access to E85. Right NOW today we are just about maxed out on what we can produce from corn. Until a process is in place to make ethanol from biomass we have reached our potential for supplying ethanol. We can waste a lot of money building more stills and without the corn to fill them it is a waste of money. You have already seen the price of E85 pass up regular. What does that mean to you. I do think biodiesel will have a more positive impact on our oil usage than ethanol over time.
#561 of 2104
Re: E85 is still the Answer - NOW [seniorjose] by rorr
Jun 06, 2006 (7:32 am)

Replying to: seniorjose (Jun 06, 2006 6:52 am)

"Removing the influence of the oil cartel or at least dissipating it is our national goal."
 
Well that's fine and dandy but raising corn for ethanol won't do it. Have you read the extensive article on ethanol in the latest (July) issue of Car and Driver?
#562 of 2104
Re: E85 is still the Answer - NOW [seniorjose] by jkinzel
Jun 06, 2006 (7:40 am)

Replying to: seniorjose (Jun 06, 2006 6:52 am)

The correct spelling is "diesel".
 
I truly admire the enthusiasm and passion you have for ethanol and E85 as an alternative fuel. You also have a deep desire to rid the US of oil dependence from other countries as I’m sure most of us do.
If you really want to eliminate our need for imported oil you would have the same enthusiasm for bio diesel as you do ethanol and I don’t see that.
Have you written your Congressman or woman asking why more has not been done to promote diesel and bio diesel passenger cars? I have.
Have you written your Congressman or woman asking why Congress, the President and the US auto makers are pushing ethanol and ignoring bio diesel and in fact legislating some of the most fuel efficient diesels off the market? I have.
I got back a form letter, but at least I did something and it’s on record.
Forgive me if I’m wrong, but with such single, narrow focus on ethanol, I can’t help but feel your enthusiasm is self serving.
#563 of 2104
Re: got a question on ffv [jim314] by mlbender
Jun 06, 2006 (8:32 am)

Replying to: jim314 (Jun 02, 2006 5:52 am)

I haven't run a full tank of E10 through yet, but if it's anything similar to my 00 Yukon 5.3 on E10, I'm expecting 14city/18hwy. I got very consistantly over 6 years of owning it. According to the fancy computer on my new truck, E10 is showing about 13.5 in mixed driving (mostly city), but that's only over about 100 miles. I'll let everyone know when I get a couple tanks through for comparison.
#564 of 2104
Re: E85 is still the Answer - NOW [seniorjose] by tpe
Jun 06, 2006 (9:03 am)

Replying to: seniorjose (Jun 06, 2006 6:52 am)

Of course Hydrogen powered autos are decades away from being practical, just as Electric autos have been phased out as impractical so far
 
Actually I'm reading that automakers like Honda and BMW are going to be introducing hydrogen vehicles way ahead of schedule. Maybe in 3-4 years.
 
If ethanol's viability is based on large government subsidies I think the idea of practicality goes out the window. Electric vehicles have already been proven. They may only have a limited range but it is more than adequate for the vast majority of commuters. So the main problem is the expensive battery pack that adds $10k or more to the price of the vehicle. No problem. Let the government subsidize this amount and, voila, its practical.
#565 of 2104
Re: E85 is still the Answer - NOW [jkinzel] by seniorjose
Jun 06, 2006 (10:56 am)

Replying to: jkinzel (Jun 06, 2006 7:40 am)

All I am saying is that Ethanol and E85 are available NOW, not like Hydrogen fuels that have No infrastructure and right now are as unsafe as a mixture of fertilizer and diesel oil...explosive resistant tanks have yet to be built.
 
There is a Biodiesel plant being built about 20-30 miles south of here. The problem with biodiesel is the same as for Ethanol...where do we get enough raw material? States like California will never accept Ethanol or Biodiesel...too bad!
 
I am not on any Ethanol bandwagon except it is a renewable resource available to us now and can be used in 12 million autos today, not tomorrow. Both Ethanol and Biodiesel are proven to be winners today and do cut down on our imported oil usage.
 
We will evolve solutions over time, there is an E95 solution to the diesel problem right now, but nobody is building any plants. Diesels will be used in passenger autos more and more. However, Ethanol can be used today in today's gasoline engines where biodiesel can only be used in a major way in our diesel trucks.
 
South America, Venezuela and Bolivia, have openly espoused their hatred of the USA getting their oil and of course Iran has generated this kind of hatred for many years.

Messages Page 57 of 211
1
...
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
...
211
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement