Sign In Join 



Will ethanol E85 catch on in the US? Will we Live Green and Go Yellow? - READ ONLY

2104 messages,  Last post on Oct 27, 2006 at 5:34 AM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Chrysler, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mercury, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Monte Carlo, Chevrolet Avalanche, Alternative Fuels, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 5 of 211
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
211
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 2104
Re: Ethanol and California [gagrice] by john1701a
Mar 29, 2006 (10:04 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Mar 29, 2006 9:04 am)

> Then you have extremists that think unless every vehicle is SULEV rated it is a polluting piece of crap that should be run through the crusher.
 
Destroy those vehicles already on the road, rather than just setting that higher standard for new ones. Really?
 
Who are these extremists you are talking about?
 
I've been called that before, even though PZEV is cleaner than SULEV and it was in reference to a minimum for new vehicles.
 
Explain this stereotype you claim to exist. Perhaps it can shed some light on the resistance to ethanol in any percentange.
 
JOHN
#42 of 2104
Re: Ethanol and California [john1701a] by gagrice
Mar 29, 2006 (10:52 am)

Replying to: john1701a (Mar 29, 2006 10:04 am)

rather than just setting that higher standard for new ones. Really?
 
By setting unrealistic emissions standards, it raises the price of new cars to where older cars are kept on the roads longer. Not everyone is as fortunate as you and I, that can buy a new car whenever the notion strikes us.
 
I would estimate with a strong degree of confidence, that 75% of all Toyotas sold in the USA two years ago were rated LEV or lower. That is a 0-3 EPA rating. Only a very small percentage of Toyotas sold in 2004 and prior were ULEV or higher. The cost per vehicle to raise the standard from ULEV to SULEV is very high. No wonder cars cost so much. With each added emissions device comes a decrease in FE. The benefit of going from ULEV to SULEV is less than one pound of pollution per 15k miles of driving. We have reached to point of diminishing returns on emissions. A car that has a LEV rating is very clean compared to any 10 year old car. We need to get "REAL" call LEV good and get on with finding solutions to our diminishing fossil fuel supply.
 
Maybe E10 is better for the environment. Is it worth the loss of fuel efficiency?
#43 of 2104
Re: Constructive Comments on E-85 [snakeweasel] by gagrice
Mar 29, 2006 (12:13 pm)

Replying to: snakeweasel (Mar 29, 2006 8:29 am)

thats presuming you can get everyone to get a Prius and spend thousands of extra bucks to convert it into a plug in
 
That is far from a slam dunk solution also. They are going to have to do some major changes in battery technology for plug-in hybrids to ever be mainstream.
#44 of 2104
Re: Constructive Comments on E-85 [gagrice] by snakeweasel
Mar 29, 2006 (12:25 pm)

Replying to: gagrice (Mar 29, 2006 12:13 pm)

I just think that ICE's will not survive this century. All stuff like E85, biodiesel and hybrids will do is, at best, be a temporary solution.
#45 of 2104
Re: Will ethanol E85 catch on in the US? Will we Live Green and Go Yellow? [snakeweasel] by jae5
Mar 29, 2006 (2:15 pm)

Replying to: snakeweasel (Mar 28, 2006 2:14 pm)

I55 and Rte. 53 - You're kinda near Woodridge area - I want to say Bolingbrook. Was looking at homes a couple years ago near 53 & 75th. I actually stayed in Lisle near Rte. 53 & 34 for about 5 years before going "back home" to the city.
 
The Clark station, know it. There isn't a Gas City by me; there is one near where I used to work in Lombard - I think it's named something else now.
 
But other than that, E85 is scarce here. There were a couple of stations long ago, in Hickory and Palos Hills that had an E85 pump, but they're gone. Even then that's kind of a drive to get to.
#46 of 2104
Re: Will ethanol E85 catch on in the US? Will we Live Green and Go Yellow? [snakeweasel] by jae5
Mar 29, 2006 (2:22 pm)

Replying to: snakeweasel (Mar 28, 2006 4:42 pm)

That is good.
 
Unfortunately not enough up to yesterday as I paid $2.42/gal or so for regular for the past month. Yesterday I filled up $2.49 - was lucky as most of the stations were $2.65 or more.
 
Again, I would have to drive a bit to get to an E85 station. Add in the distance, reduced mileage, the extra consumption and it really is not economical for me.
#47 of 2104
Re: Will ethanol E85 catch on in the US? Will we Live Green and Go Yellow? [jae5] by snakeweasel
Mar 29, 2006 (2:30 pm)

Replying to: jae5 (Mar 29, 2006 2:15 pm)

Well Bolingbrook is right.
 
IIRC there are two stations in the city, one each in Evanston, Des Plaines, Lombard, Aurora, Romeoville, Naperville, Arlington hieghts, Batavia, Mount Prospect, Orland Park, New Lenox, Willow Springs, Villa Park and a couple of other places near the city. While there not everywhere they can be gotten to with a minor detour for most drives in and around Chicago.
 
Yes if you just stay around in the city it would be hard to get to one, but if you drive around the burbs you can usually be somewhat close to one.
#48 of 2104
Re: Will ethanol E85 catch on in the US? Will we Live Green and Go Yellow? [jae5] by snakeweasel
Mar 29, 2006 (2:31 pm)

Replying to: jae5 (Mar 29, 2006 2:22 pm)

Add in the distance, reduced mileage, the extra consumption and it really is not economical for me.
 
I would say that even if you had a pump in your driveway its not economical for anyone.
#49 of 2104
Re: Constructive Comments on E-85 [john1701a] by gogogodzilla
Mar 29, 2006 (5:24 pm)

Replying to: john1701a (Mar 29, 2006 6:31 am)

Considering that coal can be processed into diesel OR gasoline...
 
...you haven't provided any reason not to use coal gasification technology.
 
If diesel isn't your cup of tea, then the coal is processed into gasoline.
 
Every ton of coal processed is just that much less money we give to terror-loving nations of the mideast.
 
Or to certifiable lunatics in South America (Venezuala).
#50 of 2104
Re: Constructive Comments on E-85 [snakeweasel] by mullins87
Mar 29, 2006 (5:27 pm)

Replying to: snakeweasel (Mar 29, 2006 8:29 am)

I don't know about your area of the country, but around here, there is a LOT of cropland that is NOT in production. Typically we can rotate corn every other year to every third year. Production typically falls in the 130-140 bushel range.
 
I'm not trying to start anything, I just think we could produce a lot more corn than we do now.

Messages Page 5 of 211
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
211
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement