Sign In Join 



Has CAFE reached the end of its usefulness?

507 messages,  Last post on Oct 27, 2009 at 11:49 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 48 of 51
1
...
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#468 of 507
Re: I have been seeing [nippononly] by gagrice
May 19, 2009 (6:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (May 19, 2009 5:41 pm)

I would be tickled with 26 MPG combined. I thought it was just my 99 Ranger that got horrible mileage. I blamed it on the 3.0L Flex fuel V6 and auto transmission. My Well man came to work on my system yesterday. He has a 2000 Ranger identical to mine with a stick shift. The best he ever gets is 15 MPG. He does have 300k miles and is on the second engine. If we had a 4 cylinder diesel we would have more power and rarely get under 30 MPG. Not something our tax and spend government would like. CAFE and the latest from Obama is all a smokescreen to appease the greenies that are yelling.
#469 of 507
Re: I have been seeing [gagrice] by fezo
May 19, 2009 (6:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (May 19, 2009 6:16 pm)

Trucks get an easier number to hit but it's better than what they have to hit under the previous CAFE numbers.
 
I'd like to know if they closed some of the loopholes that allow things that are clearly passenger cars to be counted as trucks.
#470 of 507
Re: I have been seeing [fezo] by kdhspyder
May 19, 2009 (9:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (May 19, 2009 6:20 pm)

I don't believe so. Minivans are still 'trucks' as is the HHR. Most crossovers are considered 'trucks' although they are on car frames.
#471 of 507
You should see the wailing and crying over at... by kdhspyder
May 19, 2009 (9:52 pm)
Reply
the major GM fan site. The world just ended.
 
This is not a joke...in the same forum on the same subject....the Communists, the Socialists and the Facists have taken over the auto industry. Our world as we know it is at an end.
 
The net effect is this....and it is pretty significant..
Auto's must get 42 mpg on average under CAFE meaning that they must have a combined EPA rating of about 33 mpg.
Trucks must get 26 mpg on average under CAFE meaning that they must have a combined EPA rating of about 21 mpg.
Source:New FE regs
Yesterday, we heard that, much to the automakers' delight, the new CAFE standards create a national standard and incorporate California's strict emissions rules to raise the national fleet mpg average to 42 mpg for cars and 26 mpg for light trucks for an overall average of 35.5 mpg by 2016. Current CAFE standards require an automaker's fleet of cars to average 27.5 mpg and trucks must get 24 mpg.
 
Right now the only vehicles meeting these statndards are
..the small economy cars
..the compacts
..the hybrids
.......Fusion, Camry, Altima, Prius, Civic, Insight II
..the crossovers and minivans
..the hybrid BOF SUVs
..GM's hybrid trucks
 
That's it.
 
All the full sized trucks, all the midsized trucks, all the non-hybrid BOF SUVs, all the large cars and and all the luxury non-hybrid autos miss the boat. They have one model life to improve. This includes all V8 vehicles and most V6 autos.
 
As an indication of some high volume vehicles that must move in a hurry....
All non-hybrid Camrys, Accords, Malibus, Fusions, Sonatas are nowhere near the new standards.
 
I think what we will see in 2015 is an entirely new spectrum of vehicles from all makers.
  • Every midsized auto will be a hybrid of some sort as will every crossover SUV.

  • I wouldn't be surprised to see ZERO full sized or midsized BOF SUVs being offered at that time.

  • Trucks will be a problem. None except GMs two hybrids are anywhere close to the standard
  • .
  • Large luxury autos? Nowhere near close to the standard.
  • #472 of 507
    Re: You should see the wailing and crying over at... [kdhspyder] by kdhspyder
    May 19, 2009 (10:54 pm)
    Reply

    Replying to: kdhspyder (May 19, 2009 9:52 pm)

    Update from Jalopnik...
    UPDATE: The Obama Administration contacted us to tell us the originally reported numbers of 42 MPG for cars and 27 MPG for light trucks were wrong. Instead, they're requiring an average of 39 MPG for trucks and 30 MPG for trucks. We've made the proper adjustments but even with these different numbers no one meets either requirement.
    #473 of 507
    CAFE by benjaminh
    May 20, 2009 (3:01 am)
    Reply
    Yes, the revised standard of 30 for trucks seems a significant change. 26 mpg was a much easier standard, creating in effect a loophole. The loophole gets smaller at 30 mpg. But remember, that 30 mpg is under the inflated and easy testing standard of the 1970s. I think the equivalent number today is a EPA combined city/hwy score of 22. A 4 cylinder Ranger beats that by getting 23, which would equal 31 for CAFE. But a full size V-8 F-150 gets only 17 in the new test, which would probably be about 23 for CAFE.
     
    My current Accord 4 cylinder 5 MT has a combined epa city/hwy score of 25, which equals about 34 under the 70s test used for CAFE. As a comparison a Civic manual gets 29 under the current standard, which should about hit the 39 needed for CAFE.
     
    I wonder how close the Accord will come in the next generation, due out c.2013?
    #474 of 507
    GM by benjaminh
    May 20, 2009 (3:01 am)
    Reply
    Can you give a link to that GM site?
    #475 of 507
    from today's WSJ by benjaminh
    May 20, 2009 (3:15 am)
    Reply
    "For BMW AG, the German maker of high-powered luxury cars, meeting the target "will be a big challenge," particularly if the U.S. doesn't offer more incentives to encourage consumers to buy diesel vehicles, said Friedrich Eichiner, BMW's chief financial officer. "Consumers don't want to step back" and drive smaller vehicles, he said.
     
    The new rules allow for slightly different targets, depending on each vehicle's size and the mix of cars and trucks each company offers -- a measure of flexibility auto makers hailed.
     
    The different targets mean companies that produce many fuel-efficient vehicles like small cars will have to aim higher than others that sell lots of trucks and SUVs. For example, Honda Motor Co. estimates that based on its current vehicles sold in the U.S. it will have to hit fuel economy two miles per gallon above the new average."
    #476 of 507
    BMW by benjaminh
    May 20, 2009 (3:49 am)
    Reply
    needs to bring back the 2002. If it really was about the size of the original 2002 in terms of its body and its engine, but with a modern valvetronic 4 cylinder engine, it should hit the standard easily.
     
    I can't really figure out how they would sell a 5 series V-8, however....A 6 cylinder 5 series that was a hybrid could probably get close. For BMW and others it looks like more of their cars will become hybrids....
    #477 of 507
    Re: GM [benjaminh] by kdhspyder
    May 20, 2009 (5:35 am)
    Reply

    Replying to: benjaminh (May 20, 2009 3:01 am)

    It's here

    Messages Page 48 of 51
    1
    ...
    45
    46
    47
    48
    49
    50
    51
    Prev
    Next
    Last
    Go To Msg #
    Search This Discussion
    To POST a message, please Sign In.

    New? Join Now!

    Forum Tools

    Please sign in.
    Email Address:

    Password:

    Forgot Password?

    Search Forums

    Enter Keyword(s)

    Advanced Search

    Browse by Vehicle



    View All Vehicles
    Advertisement
    Ask the Community
    See What People Are Asking

    Browse by Board

    Browse by Topic


    View All Topics

    Today's Chats

    Advertisement