Sign In Join 



Dodge Dakota Suspension and Axles

113 messages,  Last post on Oct 22, 2009 at 4:47 PM

You are in the Dodge Dakota Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Dodge Dakota, Dodge, Suspension, Truck


Messages Page 10 of 12
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#84 of 113
New front struts on 06 4x4 by ESBY
Jan 25, 2009 (10:01 am)
Reply
I just came back from a test drive after replacing the front struts on my quad-cab
4x4. What a difference! The old struts only had 24,000 miles on them, but it's obvious now that they were shot.
 The new struts have eliminated the floaty feeling I've hated since I bought the truck a few weeks ago.
 I used Monroe 'Sensatrac' struts, which were pricey, but worth it.
 If you've got access to a spring compressor; the job isn't too difficult, either.
 
Steve
#85 of 113
Edelbrock IAS is the very best by bpeebles
Jan 25, 2009 (11:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: ESBY (Jan 25, 2009 10:01 am)

The 2006 dakota has STRUTS???? are you CERTAIN they are struts? (A "strut" also holds the wheel in alignment and controls camber.)
 
BTW: The very best shock absorbers for the Dakota are still the Edelbrock IAS (Inertia Active System). They are true MONOTUBE shock absorbers which are far superiour to the dual-tube desgn that the el-cheepos use.
 
I put Edelbrock IAS on my Dak within the 1st year of purchasing brand-new and have never regretted it. Not only does it RIDE better and not jump sideways over expansion-jounts... when I hit the brakes, my truck does not do a nose-dive. (Becasue IAS knows it is not a bump in the road and stiffens up the front shocks under braking)
#86 of 113
Re: Edelbrock IAS is the very best [bpeebles] by ESBY
Jan 25, 2009 (1:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpeebles (Jan 25, 2009 11:50 am)

'Strut' simply means the shock absorber and vehicle spring are built as one unit. Some struts DO play a part in camber and alignment, but not all. 2005 and newer Dakotas employ strut suspension for the front wheels.
 I've only found two manufacturers of struts for these Dakotas: Monroe and Rancho.
The Rancos are said to 'stiffin' the ride considerably. I'm not an off-roader, so the Monroes were my preference.
  I just hope they last longer than the originals did. (24,000 miles).
 
Steve
#87 of 113
Re: Edelbrock IAS is the very best [ESBY] by bpeebles
Jan 25, 2009 (6:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ESBY (Jan 25, 2009 1:28 pm)

Thanks for the info ESBY - I was not awre that Dodge went with struts on the newer Daks.
 
It is my experience that when there are not many aftermarket parts available... there may be a design flaw which the aftermarket folks do not want any part of.
 
For example, on my 2000 Dak, the balljoints were known to snap off. The very best balljoint manufacturer (Moog) did not list any replacement balljoints for many years... why? because the design put too much stress on the balljoints and they knew if they sold a replacemet, it would also snap.
 
Another example: My ol 1981 AMC Eagle would eat front shock-absorbers no matter what I installed... I ended up paying Midas to install "lifetime warantee" shocks....Midas ended up replacing those shocks at least 3 times for free. (I got my moneys-worth out of that)
 
Good luck with your new shocks... I hope they last the life of your Dak.
#88 of 113
Re: Edelbrock IAS is the very best [bpeebles] by ESBY
Jan 26, 2009 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpeebles (Jan 25, 2009 6:01 pm)

I'd rather not have struts on the front of a truck. They're not as robust as larger springs and separate shocks would be. I suspect the struts are worn at 24,000 miles because they're trying to support too much weight for the design.
 If they wear out prematurely; I may look for a shop with 'lifetime' shocks, too.
 On the plus side; the '06 Dakota rides almost as smooth as a car.
 
Steve
#89 of 113
Re: Edelbrock IAS is the very best [ESBY] by dustyk
Jan 27, 2009 (6:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ESBY (Jan 26, 2009 6:32 am)

The new Dakotas use an assembled spring-over-shock combination. It looks like a strut in that it is removed from the suspension as one unit. It utilizes a very large diameter shock piston. There are upper and lower control arms and the "strut" does not turn like a MacPherson. I think someone told me the spring and shock are serviced separately, but I'll check on that.
 
I think the conclusion that they are not going to be durable is premature.
 
Anyway, I have never had to replace a strut on any of my cars (Plymouth, Dodge, Chrysler, Nissan, Toyota, Hyundai) and my girlfriends Concode LXI is still sporting the originals at 165,000.
 
Only time will tell.
 
Regards,
Dusty
#90 of 113
Re: Edelbrock IAS is the very best [dustyk] by ESBY
Feb 04, 2009 (2:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dustyk (Jan 27, 2009 6:57 pm)

I'm not sure what you mean by "serviced separately". The spring must be compressed to removed the shock, after the strut is removed from the vehicle.
 Based on several posts I've read regarding the life expectancy of the original shock on the front ends of these trucks; it appears the factory strut is not durable. I'm hoping the Monroe cartridge I've installed will last longer than 24,000 miles, as did the originals.
 
Steve
#91 of 113
Re: Edelbrock IAS is the very best [ESBY] by dustyk
Feb 04, 2009 (5:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ESBY (Feb 04, 2009 2:10 pm)

I asked the parts manager at my Dodge dealer and he said they haven't used a one. If they all failed within 24,000 miles they'd be replaced under warranty.
 
Dusty
#92 of 113
Re: Best Shocks for replacements [dustyk] by mrt5
Feb 04, 2009 (6:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dustyk (Mar 20, 2007 5:18 pm)

have got laugh about tires have dak sport 2000 extend cab wranglers 31 10.50 just changed them 9 months ago they still had tread not much 230000k best tires ever had just put monros sensitracks on not bad but the ariginals were the best ride same 230000k also true lost lower balljoint tire came off havent been able to get alighnment right have any specs on that would be help
#93 of 113
Re: Best Shocks for replacements [mrt5] by dustyk
Feb 04, 2009 (7:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrt5 (Feb 04, 2009 6:08 pm)

I can give you spec's for 2003, but I think the 2000 Dakota may have been different:
 
130.9 inch wheel base (All except RT) 2wd
 
Caster = 3.13 degrees
Camber = -0.00
Toe = 0.10 degrees
 
130.9 inch wheel base (All except RT) 4wd
 
Caster = 3.16 degrees
Camber = -0.00
Toe = 0.10 degrees
 
Regards,
Dusty

Messages Page 10 of 12
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement