Sign In Join 



Mazda CX-7 vs. Nissan Murano

208 messages,  Last post on Dec 26, 2008 at 8:05 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-7 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-7, Nissan Murano, SUV


Messages Page 16 of 21
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
21
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#149 of 208
Re: Mazda CX-7 vs. Nissan Murano [taz16] by sssfegy
Apr 28, 2007 (12:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: taz16 (Apr 28, 2007 8:05 am)

I hope you did not buy a car based on that info.Murano being more MSRP, should be bringing more$ than CX7.
Here is "True Reality": Manheim:
2007 Nissan Murano AWD S:
 
For Week Ending Apr 23
           Above Average Below
Sale Price$23,995 $22,672 $21,349
Mileage 5,275 10,549 15,824
Total Sold All 84 62 10
  
 For CX7 AWD (only 18 went to auction in the USA):
 For Week Ending Apr 23
             Above Average Below
Sale Price $25,661 $23,500 $21,339
Mileage 3,447 6,894 10,341
Total Sold All 18
 
Did your site say the Murano will cost less $/ yr. to drive? not because they get better mileage(check edmunds its less), but because you won't drive it as much as the Mazda!! So much for these programs, nobody should go by them.
#150 of 208
Re: Mazda CX-7 vs. Nissan Murano [taz16] by carlitos92
Apr 28, 2007 (7:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: taz16 (Apr 28, 2007 8:05 am)

Yes, nice bit of research, but $800 over 5 years is chump change. People pay that much for cellular service or cable TV in ONE year...
 
Styling is surely subjective, but I'd pay $800 NOT to have to drive a Murano any day.
#151 of 208
Re: Mazda CX-7 vs. Nissan Murano [taz16] by philmo
Apr 29, 2007 (6:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: taz16 (Apr 28, 2007 8:05 am)

I suppose if you're really on the fence with deciding between the two cars you could comfort yourself by using this comparison as a deciding factor. But the reality is that you're making a decision which boils down to $13.33 a month for 5 years. Have you worked your mortgage numbers that hard? How about weather-stripping or other utilities conservation? Do you clip coupons weekly for your groceries? My point is that not many of us are working our budgets such that $800 over 5 years will matter greatly. But for that, "Intellichoice" will label one vehicle "better" than another vehicle's "average".
#152 of 208
Re: Mazda CX-7 vs. Nissan Murano [carlitos92] by philmo
Apr 29, 2007 (6:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: carlitos92 (Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm)

To my earlier economic point, agreed. The nugget here is that with the Murano you're buying a design that has essentially remained unchanged since it's introduction vs. a brand new design with the CX-7. Further, who do you feel has the development momentum these days, Nissan or Mazda? I'll pick the latter.
#153 of 208
Re: Mazda CX-7 vs. Nissan Murano by taz16
Apr 29, 2007 (9:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: philmo (Apr 29, 2007 6:15 am)

Thanks all of you, i guess we just have to wait this fall and see how the redesigned 2008 Murano will be, i guess nissan will try to get rid of all the cons out of it (like any redesigned model)and keep the good things about it, but Nissan will probably keep the CVT in it because its in more than 25% of the company's line up Versa,Sentra,Altima,Maxima, and upcoming Rogue
For 08 the V6 will probably bump in horses within the area of the maxima(255) and altima(270, I wouldn't be surprised that Nisan will squeeze more horses out of it, the most nissan tweak in the same 3.5 liter had 306 horses in the Infiniti G35
#154 of 208
Apples and oranges by mike1111
Apr 29, 2007 (7:44 pm)
Reply
The CX-7 is nice but it is small imo.For me the Murano was much more comfortable.I'm getting 19.5 mpg with the Murano and i drive 90% city.I didn't want to spend that much on a small 4 banger with a turbo.It does look nice but not as nice as the bigger more comfortable Murano.I was gonna get the RAV4 V6 but it too was to small for a family of four imo.I would compare the CX-7 to the RAV4 before i would compare it to the Murano
#155 of 208
Re: Apples and oranges [mike1111] by hpgator
Apr 30, 2007 (3:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: mike1111 (Apr 29, 2007 7:44 pm)

I'm also wondering why everyone is still comparing the Murano to the CX-7. The Murano is a bigger car, more comfortable, and more "refined" than the CX-7 which is more for sport driving than cruise driving.
 
If the CX-7 had a V6 option then I think it would be comparable, but you can't really compare a smooth CVT to a quick turbo. As someone has already said, the comparisson for the Mazda is more so the Rav4 V6, not the Murano. IMO the Murano competes with the CX-9 more than anything.
 
Oh, and to whomever was saying that people drive the Mazda more... That's pretty silly. The Mazda gets around 4-5 mpg less in real world tests (consumer reports said it got 12 mpg in the city whereas Murano was around 16) and REQUIRES premium fuel -- something the Murano does not.
 
Your fuel costs will be higher as will your repairs/maintenance. Now, like I said, a side-by-side of the CX-9 with the Murano would make more sense.
#156 of 208
Re: Apples and oranges [mike1111] by vbbuilt
Apr 30, 2007 (3:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: mike1111 (Apr 29, 2007 7:44 pm)

"I would compare the CX-7 to the RAV4 before i would compare it to the Murano"
 
The Murano and CX-7 are more like grapes and grapples, not apples and oranges. Their styling is remarkably similar. In fact, I gave a ride to a friend this weekend in my CX-7 and he immediately asked "Is this a Murano?" LOL.
 
So, my friend, trying to compare the CX-7 to the RAV4 just won't work... they are so dis-similar, that the comparison doesnt make sense. That's why you have the CX-7 vs Murano thread. I'm sure both of us agree that both the Murano and CX-7 far outclass the RAV4, don't you think?
 
 
 
Vince.
#157 of 208
Re: Apples and oranges [vbbuilt] by mike1111
Apr 30, 2007 (8:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: vbbuilt (Apr 30, 2007 3:45 am)

If you just wanna compare the two because they somewhat have the same styling then yes thats comparable.My thing is one is a small cross over and one is a mid sized cross over.I have been next to the Mazda in traffic and it is small compared to the Murano.Thats where i think you get the differnce in handling with the smaller more sporty CX-7.I don't think you can compare the two on the same playing field because they are so differnt in size.To me the Murano is a cruise mobile.I'm not out trying to beat the guy to the next light but it is nice to know that in the mid sized test by Motor trend the Murano was regarded as the hot rod of the bunch.The CX-7 was'nt tested against the Murano in that test.i think cause its a small cross over. At any rate i'm sure you are happy with the choice you made just as i am mine.I smile most at the pump with a nice V6 getting 19.5 in the city.
#158 of 208
Re: Apples and oranges [hpgator] by sssfegy
Apr 30, 2007 (9:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpgator (Apr 30, 2007 3:41 am)

"The Mazda gets around 4-5 mpg less in real world tests (consumer reports said it got 12 mpg in the city whereas Murano was around 16)"
Ya they also said it does 0-60 in 9.5 seconds, how about reading about true mileage on Edmunds? How about the fact it gets same or better with a more aggressive style of driving? Being younger, if I own both the Murano would be parked!
They are not in the same class, nor is the Rav IMO, much closer to the RDX and X3.
"Your fuel costs will be higher as will your repairs/maintenance."
Does $200/Yr (given they both get simillar mileage) makes it difficult for you to budget for a $25+K vehicle? Who said you have more maintenance to do? Was it CR again?

Messages Page 16 of 21
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
21
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement