You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-7
Mazda CX-7 vs. Nissan Murano

208 messages, Last post on Dec 26, 2008 at 8:05 AM
You are in the Mazda CX-7 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
| We drove the Murano and the CX-9 and they are completely different vehicles, each excellent in its own way. But I had a major problem with the rear visibility in the Mazda, such as backing out of a supermarket parking spot at night when there are a bunch of trucks or SUVs parked right next to us. I don't think I could back out without risking hitting something. I'm 5'10 and my wife is 5'1. She said she loved the CX-9 but would be uncomfortable backing it out from our garage or a parking spot. There is some distance between the driver and the back window, which isn't very large. In the Pilot we didn't have any problems backing out, it is shorter and has a huge rear window. The Murano rear window isn't large but it is closer to the driver, being a shorter car than the CX-9. | |
|
Replying to: extech2 (May 11, 2007 1:20 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: hpgator (May 04, 2007 4:21 am) |
|
|
Replying to: extech2 (May 11, 2007 1:20 pm) You're going to encounter this problem no matter which vehicle you're driving. Large vehicles, such as the larger SUVs, pickups, and vans, when parked next to you, in adjacent parking slots, will block your view. It's like having a wall on either side of you. I always have to back out (creep out) very carefully, to the point where I can clearly see in both directions, then I can back out a bit more quickly, with confidence, that I'm not going to hit anything. Drivers of the Murano, CX-7, CX-9, RDX, Outlander, Tribeca and other sleeker, squatter vehicles will naturally be at a disadvantage when parked next to taller Escalades, Suburbans and similar vehicles. Vince.
|
|
|
Replying to: vbbuilt (Jun 18, 2007 4:29 am) --Unless you have a standard rear view camera like on a Murano
|
|
|
Replying to: disla (Jun 18, 2007 5:41 am) Vince |
|
|
|
|
OK, so everyone is talking about what features the CX-7 have, and what features does the Murano have. Well, I want to buy a used car (under 50k mileage) and I'm concern about the reliability of these 2 cars, because I will choose one of them. So all of you guys are talking about how good the back-up camera is, how good the handling is, how sporty the car is, how big the trunk is ... well why don't anyone is writing here what problems did you encountered with these models? This is what I wanna know, so some information will be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: FlashMagnuM (Dec 22, 2008 12:10 pm) So one of the 2 things below might be true: 1. Both cars are perfect! 2. Nobody is telling he's real problems, since everyone is praising his own car and now they're all very cautious not to say some bad stuff about it.
|
|
|
Replying to: FlashMagnuM (Dec 24, 2008 10:41 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: FlashMagnuM (Dec 24, 2008 10:41 am) http://s215240594.onlinehome.us/CR2008_smallsuv.gif http://s215240594.onlinehome.us/CR2008_midsizesuv.gif CX-7 is not listed here, but in so called "sporty SUV" category where it got slightly less then average. But if I have to choose between Murano and CX-7, I would definitely go for Murano: more space, better reliability, better styling |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-7
Mazda CX-7 vs. Nissan Murano
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-7
2010 Nissan Murano



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats