Sign In Join 



Ford Mustang Accessories and Modifications

60 messages,  Last post on Aug 23, 2009 at 2:48 PM

You are in the Ford Mustang Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Ford Mustang, Engine


Messages Page 3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#21 of 60
Re: Shaker 500 Audio vs Shaker 1000 [coolmarine24] by cccompson
Jan 21, 2007 (11:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: coolmarine24 (Jan 19, 2007 1:02 pm)

IMHO, the 1000 is about the worst value option one could purchase. It is very expensive for what you get and takes up ALOT of trunk space.
 
Only you can decide how much better it sounds so compare both with your own ears.
#22 of 60
Re: Shaker 500 Audio vs Shaker 1000 [coolmarine24] by tayl0rd
Jan 22, 2007 (5:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: coolmarine24 (Jan 19, 2007 1:02 pm)

Yes, the difference is VERY noticeable in the bass department. Is it worth it? That depends on a few things. If you're the type who always has to replace the factory radio, then no, it's not worth it. If you don't mind having a stock radio, but you want a little more oomph in the sound, yes it's worth it. I have the Shaker 1000 and it's one of the best stock radios I've ever heard; even compared to those ridiculously expensive systems in luxury cars. The clarity is good enough for me. It does well with high frequencies. And the bass is really good when used in moderation. If you turn the bass up too high, the subwoofers start to sound boomy.
 
As far as the space the sub enclosure takes up in the trunk, it's a moot point. It doesn't take up that much space, and I can assure you an aftermarket sub setup will take up MUCH more space to produce not much more or better bass, IMO.
#23 of 60
Re: Shaker 500 Audio vs Shaker 1000 [tayl0rd] by riverron
Jan 25, 2007 (1:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tayl0rd (Jan 22, 2007 5:48 am)

I have an 05 GT with the Shaker 500 and I LOVE it.. A friend here in town has a shaker 1000, and the only difference I can tell between the two (sitting in the same driveway) is he can dial up more base, BUT my Shaker 500 has way more base than most people will ever use. All you have to do is punch up the menu and dial in all the base you want. Personally, I have my base in at about 70-75% and it is all I want, and if you want to turn the volume up it WILL shake the windows. I also want the extra trunk room, have to get 2 sets of golf clubs and luggage in it once in a while. The Shaker 500 is WAY better than my departed 2000 BMW or my last Benz radios
#24 of 60
Re: 2006 v-6 pony package [ftroopgary] by ftroopgary
Jan 25, 2007 (2:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ftroopgary (Jan 11, 2007 2:41 pm)

i guess i will answer my own
 
it turns out the wires on the light switch plug are all ground the grounds are what tells the relay to turn on
 
the system is all hooked up and looks grweat
#25 of 60
71 Mustang Mach 1 SCJ (Tranny swap) by hawaiiscj
Mar 25, 2007 (4:29 pm)
Reply
I am looking at buying a 71 mach 1. The only thing is its an automatic, and I really want manual but I cant pass up this price. Is it possible to swap the auto for a stick? Ideally I would like to put in a T56. Is this possible. Thanks for any info, and Aloha from Hawaii
#26 of 60
78 Mustang Hatchback by fordhorror
Mar 31, 2007 (6:25 pm)
Reply
am planning to buy a 1978 Mustang hatchback. any suggestions if its worth buying a machine that old, the car is running. Can I add more power to it is it worth restoring it? What else can i do with a 78?
#27 of 60
2005 MUSTANG - cold air intake by fordhorror
Apr 11, 2007 (5:45 am)
Reply
I am planning to buy a K2 Motor COLD AIR INTAKE KIT.
This brand is a unheard name. But cheaper than a knn or injen.
Any one know about it?
Any feedback? experience, story would help.
 
Thanks.
#28 of 60
Cheap Modifications for a 351W by jbob88
Jun 16, 2007 (7:32 pm)
Reply
I have a 351w 1998 picked up for free. I plan on droping into 90s mustang. The Engine is all stock. What are some cheap modifications i can make to increase proformance.
 
All advice welcome.
#29 of 60
MODS by mschmal
Jun 18, 2007 (4:12 am)
Reply
It is amazing to me how willing peeps are to Modify an expensive asset like their means of transportation with some part from a fly by night or otherwise unknown company.
 
I know an cold air intake may not sound complicated but do you really think these little 2 bit companys really do any true testing on the products they sell?
 
Also, on the Shelby GT, the Factory cold air intake installed by Shelby peeps only adds about 25 hp WHEN COMBINED with a rom flash. Do you really want to flash your rom with software from some 2 bit company?
 
Mark
#30 of 60
sohc to a dohc by mellor_21
Jun 26, 2007 (10:18 pm)
Reply
k i have a 97 gt with the sohc, i was just wonderin if it was possible to change it to a dohc without replacing the engine.. im pretty good at mechanics, but im still pretty new too so i just dont know lol

Messages Page 3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement