Sign In Join 



Volvo XC70 Safety Issues

122 messages,  Last post on Dec 28, 2008 at 4:26 PM

You are in the Volvo XC70 Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Volvo XC70, Car Safety, Wagon


Messages Page 10 of 13
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#83 of 122
Re: Safety [blueiedgod] by lev_berkovich
Jun 28, 2006 (1:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: blueiedgod (Jun 28, 2006 12:49 pm)

Why not start there and MAKE people learn how to drive?
 
Because it is impractical and impossible when it comes to the emergency avoidance maneuvers.
I consider that I drive much better than the average driver. I was in the military service driving military vehicles in a wide variety of conditions, I took several defensive driving classes, I can drive manual for hours without using clutch, for instance, but nothing would help anyway in the situation that I have described a couple of postings above. Just because I do not do stunts everyday, my reflexes are not good enough, and could not match the electronics of my XC90, although, in theory, I new exactly what need to be done.
 
Some countries, Japan for example, have very stringent testing to get a driver's license.
 
Yes, but not to the degree of teaching the defensive driving anyway.
 
In the US, we compensate for lack of driver's skill with bigger, heavier more electronic laden vehicles.
 
This is not true. We drive bigger vehicles because they a) cheaper and b) we still can afford buying more gas than people in other countries.
And when it comes to electronics, the European or Japanese versions of the same vehicle are pretty much the same.
 
I guess, it would be too much to ask people to be responsible for their own actions.
 
Yes it would, because the price for it is the death or severe injury.
#84 of 122
Re: Safety [blueiedgod] by calhon
Jun 28, 2006 (10:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: blueiedgod (Jun 28, 2006 12:49 pm)

Every reasonable person would agree that better drivers are a part of the solution. Systems such as ESC and RSC are also parts of the solution. They compensate for the mistakes that people always make, and they do things that no human can.
 
There is no training or testing program that will make drivers behave perfectly, or give them super-human abilities.
#85 of 122
Re: Safety [calhon] by stevedebi
Jun 29, 2006 (2:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: calhon (Jun 28, 2006 10:22 pm)

"There is no training or testing program that will make drivers behave perfectly, or give them super-human abilities."
 
No, but you can have minimum standards. Having driven for a number of years in Germany, I can say that while it is a fast experience, the drivers are predictable in behavior, and follow the rules of the road. I think this is due to three factors:
 
1. Mandatory driving classes before a license is issued.
2. The expense of owning and driving a vehicle in Germany.
3. Really stiff fines and very serious police officers.
#86 of 122
Re: Safety [volvomax] by dae
Jul 03, 2006 (5:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Jun 27, 2006 8:10 am)

.Why would you need thicker steel, which makes a car heavier and cuts fuel efficency if you can achieve BETTER results with a harder stronger alloy?
 
Obviously, you do not know what you are talking about - just mindlessly repeating buzzword from sales booklet.
 
There is NOTHING special about steel used in Volvo. It is all about the basic engineering concept of stronger cage and predictable deformation in crumple zones. There are many ways to achieve that.
 
And if anyting - excessive weight is Volvo's problem.
 
Are you capable about discussing anything but Volvo's marketing spin on comon engineering solutions?
#87 of 122
Re: Safety [volvomax] by dae
Jul 03, 2006 (5:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Jun 27, 2006 8:29 am)

As others have posted, and I'm sure you are aware, yaw is different than roll.
 
And if you have actually read and comprehended what I had written you would not post nonsense.
 
What I have written in the second paragrpah is that Honda has ANOTHER sensor, in ADDITION to yaw sensor in stability control. Is it that hard to read?
#88 of 122
Re: Safety [dae] by lev_berkovich
Jul 03, 2006 (9:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dae (Jul 03, 2006 5:16 pm)

Easy, Dae.
It's not just marketing. Volvo DOES use the steel that is several (I think x4) stronger that the normally used one.
And Max usually KNOWS, what he is talking about, as he gets his info not just from the chat rooms.
 
And, actually, Volvo XC90 is the lightest of 3 - Honda Pilot, Acura MDX, Volvo XC90.
#89 of 122
Re: Safety [dae] by lev_berkovich
Jul 03, 2006 (9:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dae (Jul 03, 2006 5:18 pm)

Speaking of yaw, roll and nonsense....
 
...take it easy here too. As it has been already pointed out, that OTHER sensor in Honda, is not a part of the Stability system, it does not provide a feedback, but merely says "OUCH" and deploys the airbags.
Here is a quote from Honda's marketing literature -
 
"New for 2006, Pilot provides standard side curtain airbags for all three rows of seats. In addition to the protection they offer outboard occupants in the event of a side impact, these side curtain airbags are fitted with a rollover sensor to help provide protection in a rollover. Most side curtain airbags in this class are designed to provide side-impact protection, but rarely do they also provide protection in the event of a rollover."
 
In this sense - Volvo has THIRD sensor, that does the same function deploying IC.
 
Why it is so difficult for people to except Volvo's leadership in active and passive safety?
#90 of 122
Re: Safety [dae] by volvomax
Jul 06, 2006 (10:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: dae (Jul 03, 2006 5:16 pm)

Dae, you have no idea what you are talking about.
Volvo does indeed use hardened steel in the cage area of the XC90.
This use is widely reported.
They aren't the only ones to use boron steel in the manufacture of their cars, the Germans do as well, but the XC90 represents the most widespread use of the material.
#91 of 122
Re: Volvo vs Honda Safety by orbit9090
Jul 13, 2006 (5:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (May 26, 2006 2:55 pm)

> I tell you what. You get your Honda, I'll get a Volvo we'll hit each other head on 50 mph and see who does better.
 
OK, you spend $32K on a little Volvo S40 AWD Automatic, and I'll spend $28K on a 4500lb Honda Ridgeline. Let's tango...
 
Here's the last thing you will ever see...
 
#92 of 122
Re: Volvo vs Honda Safety [orbit9090] by drive62
Jul 13, 2006 (5:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: orbit9090 (Jul 13, 2006 5:07 am)

Hey, that was his threat...errr...challenge to me.
 
Feel free to take the mantle and turn his Vord (or do you say Folvo) to scrap metal .

Messages Page 10 of 13
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement