Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Honda Fit Honda Fit
4728 messages, Last post on Nov 06, 2009 at 4:57 AM
You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: micweb (Jun 30, 2009 10:11 am) Ha ha. That's kind of what I suspected in my original "tirade." That if you are coming off a 90's econo car, the Fit will seem fine (most likely better, in terms of noise, vibration, harshness) but compared to some other current cars in its niche, it's on the bottom of the scale - based on my test drives and ratings from Consumer Reports & Consumer Guide (Consumer Guide is available online, free). Yes the Civic is a dull car. Only the hatchback Si broke that mold. In a lot of ways the Fit is like a mild reincarnation of the Si hatchback - except it has four doors and a much better rear seat. After all, the Fit now has more horsepower than my 2003 Civic had - it only had 115hp, the Fit has 118 - and the Fit is closer in weight to the mid 2000's Si. The only thing I would note, is that you probably should take all these cars you are test driving out on the freeway and try them at 65, 70, 80 (if the salesman doesn't object). With the stereo off, the fan turned on low, and no conversation with the salesman. Conversations and stereos are big masks for "ambient noise levels." I am not saying the Fit is bad. I drove the prior generation to LA. But on that drive I did notice I kept my speed down to 75, whereas on other vehicles I am blipping up to or beyond 80 mph (not good, I know, but actually slower than prevailing traffic). The Fit felt fine at 75, but not as comfortable at 80. The new generation Fit is COMPLETELY redesigned with a longer wheel base, it's wider, has bigger wheels and tires, so I suspect - but can't confirm - that now it's probably an able 80 mph freeway flyer. I kinda hope you get the Fit so you can talk me into one too.... |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: micweb (Jun 30, 2009 12:42 pm) I've often said the US market needed an updated version of the wonderfully efficient, eager and entertaining mid-eighties Civic Wagon.  I think the Fit fits that description well.
|
|
|
Replying to: stephen987 (Jun 30, 2009 3:30 pm) And yes I think the Fit is the modern incarnation of the Civic Wagon. Better in SO many ways - I would just like to see Honda hit "perfection" with one more gear on the manual transmission, a little more sounproofing, and better tires on the base model. And of course stability control. BTW I checked Consumer Reports. On their 150 mile simulated road trip (mostly freeway, not stop and go) the manual transmission Fit Sport they drove returned 41 mpg - awesome mileage. So although the Fit this year is rated lower for gas mileage, in reality it is capable of some amazing tricks (their city mileage was 24, highway 37, so don't ask me why the blended long drive did so much better - unless the higher percentage of time spent "warming up" the car on the city and highway tests they run impacts gas mileage that much). |
|
|
Replying to: stephen987 (Jun 30, 2009 3:30 pm) micweb: how's the shifter on that Nissan? On paper I think a 6 speed in this class is a great idea, but I've heard complaints about the clutch and shifter on the Versa. Haven't tried it yet myself. My Miata has a 6 speed and I'm not 100% convinced that's better than a 5 speed, most of the time it's overkill and I just skip 5th gear anyway.
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Jul 01, 2009 10:36 am) |
|
|
Replying to: micweb (Jun 30, 2009 10:11 am) I don't necessarily agree with the floor mats comment. I balked at the Honda OEM floormat price and cost of installation. Instead, I bought the top quality heavy carpet choice at Wal-Mart for $20. I then used two 2" by 3" strips of velcro glued to the bottom of the driver floor mat, and to the vinal section behind the pedals. No more problem with slipping and a much heavier quality carpet material. The mats have stayed perfectly in place for several months without problems--although they don't fit perfectly around the "dead pedal" without cutting.
|
|
|
Replying to: gatortom1 (Jul 02, 2009 11:55 am) I took a different route for floor mats on my '08, also resorting to Wal-Mart - except I visited their auto accessories floor mat aisle. I didn't buy any of the pre-packaged "sets", I looked for the heavy duty rubber mats that are usually on the bottom shelf under the hanging sets. They have small rear seat squares - these are the "all season" black ones - and also front seat ones with the protruding "tongues" designed to run up under the pedals. On the last generation '08 I had, the conventional front seat mats just wouldn't fit in the narrow space between the wheel well and the center stack. But I had seen how Honda positioned their own "all season" mats in their brochure, and took a lesson from them. I just reversed the usual location of the mats, from front to back! The "little" squares from the truck oriented all season mats fit just fine in front, and didn't slip. While not ideal for a muddy-shoed passenger stretching out their legs, for me the square worked fine. The "tongued" all season mats then fit REALLY well in the rear - the tongue fit nicely between the seat frame rack on each seat, and took care of the extra long leg room provided in the rear seat of the Fit. Regardless of what YOU decide for the front seat, I highly recommend using the "front" all season Wal Mart floor mats because they fit so well - and due to the flat rear floor, these "wider" front mats fit well (narrow tongue to extend under the seats, wide back portion to cover as much of the rear floor as possible). Anyway I hope this helps. What you can take from this post and the prior post is that neither of us wanted to use the expensive factory floor mats, or deal with attaching them (the all season rubber mats are heavy and sticky enough not to shift around). |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: gatortom1 (Jul 02, 2009 11:55 am) All of this assumes I actually buy a Fit. I haven't yet had a chance to check out the non-Honda competition--I'll probably do that this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: stephen987 (Jul 02, 2009 1:08 pm) Advantages of the Soul: more front seat space more equipment (bluetooth, satellite radio, seat height adjuster) more torque at low rpm smoother and quieter for the daily slog longer warranty probably more comfortable for extended trips Advantages of the Fit: somewhat nicer interior materials better handling shifter feels sportier in general, more fun to drive quickly probably less likely to need that warranty slightly better mpg So I'm on the fence. The real world price probably won't differ by more than $1k. I have some thinking to do.
|
|
|
I've test driven a lot of cars over the past few months and have done a lot of research. I am going to buy a Fit Sport....except for one lingering question I have. I live in Cleveland OH, lotsa snow. I am used to driving a Toyota Tacoma pickup. I realize that's a tremendous change and I am not expecting the snow performance I got with the Tacoma but can the Fit at least handle well in snow? I want to go smaller but get a little paranoid when I think about how small cars perform in snow. Am I gonna be skidding all over the place??? Thanks for any input.... |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Honda Fit Honda Fit
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Fit
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
