Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Honda Civic Honda Civic Si Sedan
480 messages, Last post on Feb 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM
You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: iomatic (Sep 13, 2007 3:44 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: sabastian (Sep 13, 2007 4:06 pm) |
|
|
|
|
so i've been part of this group since June 23 when i bought my Si sedan. as some of you have said, you developed a left front popping sound in the suspension when hitting certain bumps or road imperfections. mine started at about 1000 miles. i went to my dealer tonight and recreated the problem by driving over pavement that has a culvert drain cover over a sunken area of the road, like a street. that's the only way i ever heard the popping sound. the technician called honda. they said they are aware of the problem but have not decided how best to fix it yet since the sedan problem is a recent one as opposed to the coupe which has had the same problem. so we wait and see. otherwise, this car is a blast. but a funny thing happened to my trade-in back in June: it was an '05 Accord coupe 4 cyl with only 12,000 miles on it. it was sold a couple weeks later, and then 3 days after that, the tranny fell out of it! i never ever had a problem. too weird. guess i was meant to get rid of it, and lucky for me i did when i did.
|
|
|
Replying to: iomatic (Sep 13, 2007 3:44 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: blitzebill (Sep 13, 2007 6:59 pm) This Civic will have a tough time matching the reliability of my 95 EX coupe. That car went to 100k with only 2 problems other than normal wear (tires, battery, etc): the passenger side door pull cracked (just drove in a bigger screw with a washer) and the cupholder broke (swapped it with one taken from a junkyard for $30). Lowest maintenance of any car I've ever had. |
|
|
Replying to: civiclove1 (Jun 23, 2007 10:49 pm) I have read about the need for an ECU reflash, however, it appears this is only necessary for the 06 Si. I also went to the Honda Dealer, and of course their know-it-all arrogant attitude was on full display and of course said they had never heard of such a thing... If anyone has a solution to this issue, please write me at sizroch  comcast.net Thanks |
|
|
Replying to: cz75 (Sep 13, 2007 11:05 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: steve155 (Sep 16, 2007 6:44 am) Good luck finding one with NAV. They don't make many, and the chances of a local dealer getting one in your color choice will be dicey. My dealer (in fact all of Houston) didn't have one on the lot when we decided to purchase. The dealer was able to pull up a delivery schedule list showing what cars were slated to be delivered in the Houston area (including the colors and options). They were more than willing to do a trade with another dealer if they were getting just what we wanted. Turns out they were getting a ralley red soon and no one was getting one with ralley red AND Nav. To get one with Nav, we were looking at an unspecified much longer wait. As it was we had to wait 6 weeks for ours to be delivered. One thing no one has mentioned. Don't expect to be able to get the iPod adapter. Apperently they've been pulled because once they make one, iPod does an update and they no longer work. They have no idea when/if they'll be made again. Right now we're using a Monster FM adapter with mixed results. |
|
|
quite a comparo, sabastian you have a dilema! bascially, the pro's and con's of each car were outlined in your post, and like some posters have said, forget about what your friends say, and go for what your heart says, as cheesy as that sounds. the gti has a better powerband, the si has a better sounding engine and exahust note, the gti is def the best long distancer, the si loves the twisties, the gti less so, but it loves the freeway more, and it loves having more than just you in the car. both cars can do pretty much what the other one can, its just that they do some things the other does a bit better. i wouldn't worry too much about mkV reliability; its not up to the honda standard, but not nearly as bad as it used to be. (and then you have newer honda's which have had their issues, and suddenly they are this horrible, unreliable company!  ) the biggest deal would be maintenence. even though they are both performance vehciles and would naturally require you to eck out a bit more with regards to their more economical siblings, VW's are not cheap to maintain, even if you have no problems with yours. i like both cars for different reasons. The roadtrip going, torque whore, i-love-a-simple/classy-interior in me says gti, but the sensible, high rpm, backroads hugging honda man in me says the si.
|
|
|
Replying to: sabastian (Sep 12, 2007 5:55 pm) Torque at low revs is decent for NA 2.0 4cyl, but it isn't anything like the GTI. Generally, consider that you'll need 50% more revs in the Si than the GTI to get similar performance. If you try to accelerate quickly at 3k RPM, you'll be disappointed, but at normal traffic speeds, 4-5k RPM gives decent kick and isn't *that* loud (it is loud, though). It will pull as low as 1500RPMs or so, but, well, it won't pull much and it isn't really meant to be driven with the engine that slow. I normally cruise around 2.5k-3k RPMs, which might sound high, but, seriously, the engine was meant to do it this way. It's smooth as can be imagined, and not very loud at those speeds. 6th gear is quite tall considering where the engine makes its power; you're doing 2500RPM at 55mph. Highway acceleration is economy car-like in 6th, but that's no real surprise. Drop to 5th and it's quite adequate for the majority of uses, and 3rd and 4th are geared *perfectly* for acceleration in to lower highway speeds and higher highway speeds respectively. It's enough in 6th gear that you won't need to downshift to maintain speed up large hills unless the car is loaded down. You don't need to touch vtec at all in normal driving, except for passing quickly, where you just flick it in to 2nd/3rd/4th, and you're off quite nicely. There are suspension issues, I have something similar to the popping sound that people have been speaking of, but it doesn't affect driving other than being a sound. Dealer claimed it was nothing when I took it in, I'm just waiting for a TSB or recall on it now. Overall, the Si is not a quiet car, though it is reasonable if you keep the revs down and drive normally (which is very, very difficult to do). The ride is superb for the level of handling the car offers. If you're used to VWs and Audis, the Honda will be a lot firmer, but it is extremely composed, and very comfortable. You do feel all the small bumps on the road, but only in rare circumstances are they jarring. The biggest difference for you will be in going from small turbo engines to a NA engine that'll put out about the same amount of power; if you don't rev the snot out of the Honda, it won't go very fast. It's more than adequate, mind you, but if you shift at 6000RPM, the 0-60 time in the Si is likely to be similar to a regular Civic; only when you go beyond that does the car actually become truly quick. When you're in the VTEC range, the Si feels like an insanely light vehicle that you can zip around in to your heart's content. It's a very different feel compared to the VW/Audi weight and torque. You should probably still give the Speed3 a whirl, though it might not be what you're looking for, it might still win you over. A lot of people really like them. Oh. I can start it pretty easily in 3rd gear with some careful clutch modulation going *slightly* uphill. I bet I could do it in 4th on flat or slightly downhill road, but I don't want to do that to my clutch. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Honda Civic Honda Civic Si Sedan
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Honda Civic
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
