Sign In Join 



Hyundai Azera vs Toyota Avalon vs Ford 500 vs Chevrolet Impala

863 messages,  Last post on Aug 12, 2009 at 3:34 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Impala Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Azera, Toyota Avalon, Ford Five Hundred, Chevrolet Impala, Ford Taurus, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 81 of 87
1
...
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
...
87
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#794 of 863
Re: Avalon [captain2] by scbob
Oct 03, 2007 (10:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Oct 03, 2007 8:50 am)

Very complicated situation. To some extent Toyota/Lexus is riding on its reputation, which was fairly earned. However, reliability in last few years has not been as good. Many, but not all, Toyota or Lexus dealers will only knock a couple of hundred off an Avalon or Lexus, whereas other dealers, such as Hyundai, knock off thousands.
    Charging a lot for new models keeps prices of old models up.
    Of course, there are the many billions in health care costs that Ford owes. Add to this higher current salaries,executive pay, retirement, etc. and you can see how hard it is for the Big Three to compete. Why do you think they build new plants in the anti-union South?
  But this does not negate the problem that the Big Three have not paid as much attention to quality as they should have.
#795 of 863
Re: Avalon [scbob] by captain2
Oct 03, 2007 (2:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: scbob (Oct 03, 2007 10:17 am)

reliability in last few years has not been as good
overall probably a fair statement (Lexus excluded), but with a coupla caveats - first Toyota has done an admirable job maintaining what it could of its 'legendary ' reliability in spite of meeting rather insane (and unforecasted I believe) growths in demand and secondly most of the other mfgrs have improved to a point that that 'reliability' should only factor in a buying decision when that buyer is expecting 150k (or more) ( or 10 years) out of his/her purchase - very unusual these days. In short it is easy for Ford/GM to produce competitively reliable cars when they have a lot of time (and largely must spend that time because of those union contracts) and in fact those cars must use parts and pieces from yesteryear (financial considerations?) where real new model problems were generally addressed a long time ago. Had either company did what Toyota did do with the Avalon 3 years ago, I think there is a very strong possibility that this reliability gap that is shrinking would instead be widening.
 I broke a cardinal rule (never buy a truly new car in its first year of production) with the purchase of my 05 Av, have been rewarded with 60k troublefree miles, and would NEVER have even considered it with something other than a Honda, Toyota, and/or Nissan product. And that, more than any other reason, is why I along with many many others will spend a bit more money on cars made by those particular mfgrs.
#796 of 863
Re: Avalon [cobrazera] by barnstormer64
Oct 06, 2007 (7:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: cobrazera (Oct 03, 2007 3:18 am)

and we're going to have low tire pressure sensors because people don't check their tire pressure.
 
I actually LIKE this idea (though not as a federal mandate). It's much easier to check your tire pressure on a routine basis this way.
 
Now if they'd make it so I could push a button to air up the tires . . .
#797 of 863
Re: Avalon [captain2] by scbob
Oct 08, 2007 (12:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Oct 03, 2007 2:11 pm)

Had a 2003 Camry XLE V6 and traded up to an Azera at 67,000 miles. Just didn't like the Avalon inside or out and hard to get ESC. Also, dealer offered very little off on a Limited and very little for my car compared to Hyundai.
  The current styling of Toyota Avalon and Lexus ES and GS just does not appeal to me.
  My Camry was excellent, but have a friend who had a 2003 Camry SE-problems with a part on the engine melting, sunroof "struts" breaking, etc. at about 40,000 miles and Toyota would not repair any of it. He got an Acura (3rd one).
   Check out Consumer Reports annual car issue, esp. the reliability of the Lexus GS.
   Will admit that when Toyota realized it was losing quality a year or two ago, they did slow down the assembly lines and increase inspections.
  Toyota has made great cars and comparively speaking still does, but the competition is heating up.
#798 of 863
Re: Avalon [barnstormer64] by scbob
Oct 08, 2007 (12:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: barnstormer64 (Oct 06, 2007 7:26 am)

I have TPMS on my wife's RAV4 and appreciate it. However, I do not believe it actually measures it accurately to within one or two pounds as we should. That's why I still check mine periodically.
  Also, if the tires are rotated, it cancels the TPMS and you have to re-set it.
  Also, Fix-A-Flat will destroy the TPMS sensors.
#799 of 863
Re: Avalon [scbob] by captain2
Oct 09, 2007 (5:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: scbob (Oct 08, 2007 12:06 pm)

suggest a high degree of correlation between 'newness' of product lines, production numbers - and any perceived (or real) incidence of problems. Using Toyota as the 'fall guy', it must also be noted that every vehicle starting all the way up at FS PU trucks and only excluding the Mexican built Corolla are new and reengineered vehicles since 2005- let 'Detroit' try that and we would have bodies in the streets - literally.
#800 of 863
Re: Avalon [captain2] by scbob
Oct 13, 2007 (1:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Oct 09, 2007 5:50 am)

Sorry, I am having trouble understanding what you are trying to say.
#801 of 863
Re: Avalon [scbob] by keitha3
Oct 14, 2007 (7:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: scbob (Oct 08, 2007 12:06 pm)

Even though my Accord has only 25K on it, I'll be buying a new car in the next year. The Accord will go to my youngest daughter who, by then, will have her license.
 
I've been all over the place researching what car to get. Should I get a "fun" car like the Infiniti G35, a totally practical car like one of the hybrids, or one that will suit the family well with comfort for long trips.
 
I had never considered Hyundai products, but, due to a recent thread, went to test the Sonata, which I wasn't a big fan of, especially due to its interior design. However, the Azera piqued my interest. Liked the interior/exterior design much better. Went for a test drive and it's moved to the top of my list for a variety of reasons. It has room, is comfortable, has all the amenities that I might want, is reliable (so far in its early history), has the warranty, has plenty of power, and looks to my eyes to be quite attractive, especially with the black exterior/tan leather interior.
 
The price is amazing. The dealer, knowing that I wouldn't be buying for a while, tried to tempt me with the Limited for about 23K, including destination, but not tax/license.
 
When I look at other cars, for instance the Avalon or new Accord, I couldn't get nearly the car for that same amount. It's not ever close. Money isn't my only consideration, but, geez, I liked the ride in the Azera more than the Accord or the Avalon. It's almost a no brainer for me.
 
The downsides were that the Azera seemed to recognize road irregularities more than even my present Accord. Hopefully, the 2008's will address this issue. I don't really want navigation or a moonroof, so the fact that these aren't incorporated into the car doesn't really bother me. Moonroofs are an option and navigation soon will be. I'd also like a CD changer rather than a single disc unit, but, at the price of the option, wouldn't do it, in that I listen primarily to talk radio.
 
No doubt, my mind could waiver quite a bit as I get closer to actually buying, but, for now, the Azera heads my list. This from someone who wouldn't even consider a Hyundai product a few months ago.
#802 of 863
Re: Avalon [scbob] by captain2
Oct 14, 2007 (1:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: scbob (Oct 13, 2007 1:56 pm)

rather simple, pretty much every vehicle you find on Toyota/Lexus lots are or were new designs no later than 2005, primarily to the line wide adoption of the 2GR drivetrain while those "American" mfgrs are still using 10-50 year old drivetrain vintages. Take the Lucerne, for example, both the vintage 3.8 or even the slightly more current, Northstar are both established designs and logically would have fewer 'teething' problems. Don't
believe this to truly be the case in the specific example of the Toyota V6, but this is an engine which might possibly the best V6 out there at any price is a good example of what can be done with some R&D money - something Toyota has plenty of, and is seriously in short supply over at Ford/GM/Chrysler.
#803 of 863
Re: Avalon [keitha3] by dborth
Oct 14, 2007 (3:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: keitha3 (Oct 14, 2007 7:41 am)

Re 801: "The downsides were that the Azera seemed to recognize road irregularities more".
 
That, is a diplomatic way of saying Azera has a lousy and noisy suspension system, which is my biggest compliant. Other than that, you'll be hard pressed to find the combination of features, warranty and price from ANY manufacturer, especially Honda/Toyota.

Messages Page 81 of 87
1
...
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
...
87
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement