Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Smart Shopper Stories from the Sales Frontlines
48046 messages, Last post on Dec 03, 2009 at 10:40 AM
You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester
|
Replying to: houdini1 (Jan 04, 2009 4:16 pm) I'm a bit leary of turning over control of my car to stability control, for the very reasons you wrote about. Seems like there would be a kill switch for the certain instances which you discribed. I'm sure the positive of s/c far outweigh the negatives though..
|
|
|
Replying to: jipster (Jan 04, 2009 5:40 pm) I agree that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. I am mainly telling my tale as a public service in case anyone else finds themselves in this situation.
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Jan 04, 2009 2:32 pm) Wow, and what do you call a "long list"? I don't think I have to tell you that when you're at the negotiating table, I wouldn't mention your "short list". I'd be willing to bet the biz guys here would walk you when they heard that.  jmonroe
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jipster (Jan 04, 2009 5:40 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: houdini1 (Jan 04, 2009 4:16 pm) I am not technologically knowledgeable but I don't think you would have done better if you didn't have traction control. The road might have been so icy that both rear wheels couldn't get traction......and probably no vehicle could have gone up the hill. Also, keep in mind I am technologically challenged, but I don't think stability control would help too much in this situation either. The wheels have to be able to grip onto something for it to work - they can't defy physics and magically go up a sheet of ice. You did state it was better to have TC and SC so I know this doesn't apply to you or most, but saying you would be better off without these features is like saying you are better off without seatbelts because one person in 500,000 is saved because he wasn't wearing his seatbelt...he got thrown clear. |
|
|
Replying to: houdini1 (Jan 04, 2009 5:53 pm) OK, now my tale. Just this past summer I was driving Mrs. jmonroe’s 06’ Sonata LX (V6 with full fledged Stability Control not just Traction Control like my 05’ XG 350). I noticed that the car needed gas, so as the nice guy that I am; I pulled in and filled it up. It was raining and the exit I used was about 30 yards from the corner light which I noticed had changed just as I was pulling out. So, I floored it and it almost died (me too) because it sensed slipping on the wet road. Then as I was bracing myself it must have caught onto what I wanted it to do and the hesitation stopped and the car gained speed, just in time to avoid someone climbing up I’ve been driving for a couple years now and I don’t like the idea of something taking control of the car I’m driving. I’ve done just fine when left to my own ability. I’ve actually thought of turning that system off under those situations but so far I’ve successfully resisted that urge. I guess it’s hard to teach an old driver new tricks.  jmonroe
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jmonroe (Jan 04, 2009 7:02 pm) Here's mine, which took place while co-driving a BMW X5 in the 2000 Alcan Winter Rally. Think: Duel meets Ice Station Zebra... It happened on a transit stage between Coldfoot and Fairbanks when my co-driver Russ decided to pass a trucker who was apparently well and truly ticked off by the hoards of rally cars buzzing south sporting 100w driving lights. As Russ pulled out to pass, the trucker crowded us onto the snow covered shoulder. Russ completed the pass and cranked the wheel hard right to get the left wheels out of the snow. The X5 got quite a bit sideways and the DSC, apparently flustered by the speed, steering angle, and yaw rate, ramped the throttle way back. As in OFF. Fortunately, the X5 decided to relinquish control to Russ before we became a hood ornament on the front grill of the annoyed trucker.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jmonroe (Jan 04, 2009 6:22 pm) Well I would call the long list all the cars that would fit my budget. I am not expecting to go replace my car anytime soon so I am not really working on eliminating cars to quickly. However since we have one car thats 11 years old with 140K miles on it and another thats 9 years old with 160K miles on it I am keeping my eyes open just in case. Trust me when I go into negotiations I will have a short list of one, with an alternate or two just in case. |
|
| I believe that stability control/traction control are more helpful than AWD in the inclement weather. If I turn the stability control off on my wife's '07 X3 and try to start going uphill, all 4 tires spin (I should really put a set of 4 snow tires on it). If I leave the stability control on, the car goes with ZERO DRAMA. | |
|
Replying to: jmonroe (Jan 04, 2009 7:02 pm) You meant old dog... right?  I think stability control is over-rated, and the studies showing 58% reduction in injuries bogus. New "er" technologies like s/c cannot cover for all the variables and contingencies where activation actually becomes counter productive. Yeah, I'll take it, but I will still rely on my good driving abilities/instincts and cat like reflexes over this so called modern miracle.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Smart Shopper Stories from the Sales Frontlines
