Sign In Join 



Stories from the Sales Frontlines

48066 messages,  Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 7:08 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying


Messages Page 3678 of 4808
1
...
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
...
4808
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#36762 of 48066
Re: [joel0622] by roadburner
Dec 02, 2008 (8:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: joel0622 (Dec 02, 2008 12:48 pm)

I don't know if any one will hook him up right now. I don't think ford will be interested. When he won one of these he gave it to his caddy.
 
Proof positive that Buick ownership causes irreversible brain damage...
#36763 of 48066
Re: [explorerx4] by obyone
Dec 03, 2008 (12:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Dec 02, 2008 3:51 pm)

Mulally siad he will work for a buck a year, so i guess that precludes just about everyone.
 
He qualified that statement by saying only "if" Ford had to use the bailout money. He anticipates that "most likely" Ford won't need the money. He also expects Ford to go under if GM does. So what does that say?
#36764 of 48066
Re: [roadburner] by obyone
Dec 03, 2008 (12:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: roadburner (Dec 02, 2008 8:56 pm)

Proof positive that Buick ownership causes irreversible brain damage...
 
Tiger has a kid and a gorgeous wife. What could he possible need a two seater for? Now the caddy just got married a year or two ago. Additionally by giving it away he is no longer responsible for the full tax liability caused by winning it.
#36765 of 48066
Re: [obyone] by snakeweasel
Dec 03, 2008 (4:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: obyone (Dec 03, 2008 12:04 am)

Additionally by giving it away he is no longer responsible for the full tax liability caused by winning it.
 
Sorry wrong answer, if he won it and accepted it he is taxed on its value. If he gives it away not only is he taxed on the value of the car he might incur a gift tax (unless its donated to a bonified charity).
#36766 of 48066
Re: [traindriver] by driver100
Dec 03, 2008 (5:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: traindriver (Dec 02, 2008 7:42 pm)

Regal GS around that vintage that wasn't a bad looking ride. (search buick regal gs on ebay, look at the red one)
 
Couldn't find one on EBay but this should be close;
 
Buick Regal GS
 
Looks like a nice car but I thought you had to prove you were 80 or over before they would give you a Buick. I heard they have a new option, it automatically turns off your signal light if you don't actually make a turn in 2 miles
#36767 of 48066
Re: [snakeweasel] by golic
Dec 03, 2008 (5:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: snakeweasel (Dec 03, 2008 4:52 am)

my guess - Tiger is not worried about taxes.
#36768 of 48066
Re: [obyone] by exb0
Dec 03, 2008 (5:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: obyone (Dec 03, 2008 12:02 am)

He also expects Ford to go under if GM does. So what does that say?
 
Ford and GM share same parts suppliers. If GM goes under, suppliers will go under and pull Ford down with them.
 
I still don’t think that GM and Ford will survive unless UAW is disbanded. No company can survive if they have to pay an army of retirees and their spouses a pension and health benefits for the rest of their lives? Is there any other company that still offers these benefits to their current blue color employees?
#36769 of 48066
Re: [driver100] by graphicguy
Dec 03, 2008 (7:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: driver100 (Dec 03, 2008 5:25 am)

driver....those supercharged Buicks were something of a sleeper. I still see a lot of those (and the supercharged Gran Prix) around. Based on the ubiquitous 3.8L GM V6 (which had quite a following). The GENERAL slapped a supercharger on them for customers that wanted a bit more "sport" in their rolling couches.
 
isell....I would also ask that you extend my kind wishes to Mack when you get in touch with him again. Glad to hear he's doing better.
 
Chrysler? Nardelli? I agree. Cerebus/Chrysler is a private company. They deserve public money, why exactly? Daimler/Cerebus did everything within their power to screw Chrysler. We're supposed to clean up their mess? I'm thinking....NO! FIrst, Daimler still has a vested interest in Chrysler. They're a foreign entity. If Nardelli can't put forth a better plan than what he's laid out, I can't see any reason for us to agree to their bailout.
 
Wagoner and GM....I don't know any of the specifics of what models he's axing, plants he's going to shutter, or how he's planning to sustain GM past the next few months (let alone the next few years). Still, gotta do better than what I'm hearing.
 
Ford and Mullaly? Seems to have a better handle on what Ford needs to do. Still, I have yet to hear any concrete details on how he intends to stay out of putting his hand in the public till.
#36770 of 48066
Re: [golic] by snakeweasel
Dec 03, 2008 (3:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: golic (Dec 03, 2008 5:40 am)

I was thinking the same thing.
#36771 of 48066
Re: Mackabee [isellhondas] by greanpea68
Dec 03, 2008 (5:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: isellhondas (Dec 01, 2008 4:39 pm)

Sent me an email last week and he was very much alive
 
Thanks Isell..... I was a little worried. I just emailed to see if I get a response because I haven't heard from him in about 3 weeks.
 
 
Hope he is having his favorite burrito
 
GP

Messages Page 3678 of 4808
1
...
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
...
4808
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement