You are here:
Forums
Smart Shopper
Stories from the Sales Frontlines

48066 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 7:08 PM
You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: joel0622 (Dec 02, 2008 12:48 pm) Proof positive that Buick ownership causes irreversible brain damage...
|
|
|
Replying to: explorerx4 (Dec 02, 2008 3:51 pm) He qualified that statement by saying only "if" Ford had to use the bailout money. He anticipates that "most likely" Ford won't need the money. He also expects Ford to go under if GM does. So what does that say?
|
|
|
Replying to: roadburner (Dec 02, 2008 8:56 pm) Tiger has a kid and a gorgeous wife. What could he possible need a two seater for? Now the caddy just got married a year or two ago. Additionally by giving it away he is no longer responsible for the full tax liability caused by winning it.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: obyone (Dec 03, 2008 12:04 am) Sorry wrong answer, if he won it and accepted it he is taxed on its value. If he gives it away not only is he taxed on the value of the car he might incur a gift tax (unless its donated to a bonified charity).
|
|
|
Replying to: traindriver (Dec 02, 2008 7:42 pm) Couldn't find one on EBay but this should be close; Buick Regal GS Looks like a nice car but I thought you had to prove you were 80 or over before they would give you a Buick. I heard they have a new option, it automatically turns off your signal light if you don't actually make a turn in 2 miles
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Dec 03, 2008 4:52 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: obyone (Dec 03, 2008 12:02 am) Ford and GM share same parts suppliers. If GM goes under, suppliers will go under and pull Ford down with them. I still don’t think that GM and Ford will survive unless UAW is disbanded. No company can survive if they have to pay an army of retirees and their spouses a pension and health benefits for the rest of their lives? Is there any other company that still offers these benefits to their current blue color employees? |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: driver100 (Dec 03, 2008 5:25 am) isell....I would also ask that you extend my kind wishes to Mack when you get in touch with him again. Glad to hear he's doing better. Chrysler? Nardelli? I agree. Cerebus/Chrysler is a private company. They deserve public money, why exactly? Daimler/Cerebus did everything within their power to screw Chrysler. We're supposed to clean up their mess? I'm thinking....NO! FIrst, Daimler still has a vested interest in Chrysler. They're a foreign entity. If Nardelli can't put forth a better plan than what he's laid out, I can't see any reason for us to agree to their bailout. Wagoner and GM....I don't know any of the specifics of what models he's axing, plants he's going to shutter, or how he's planning to sustain GM past the next few months (let alone the next few years). Still, gotta do better than what I'm hearing. Ford and Mullaly? Seems to have a better handle on what Ford needs to do. Still, I have yet to hear any concrete details on how he intends to stay out of putting his hand in the public till.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: golic (Dec 03, 2008 5:40 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: isellhondas (Dec 01, 2008 4:39 pm) Thanks Isell..... I was a little worried. I just emailed to see if I get a response because I haven't heard from him in about 3 weeks. Hope he is having his favorite burrito GP |
|
You are here:
Forums
Smart Shopper
Stories from the Sales Frontlines
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats