Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Smart Shopper Stories from the Sales Frontlines
47368 messages, Last post on Nov 10, 2009 at 9:15 PM
You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Jul 31, 2006 6:19 am) To be honest with you, when I look at Range Rover cars on the street they do not look like $72,000 cars to me.. They look like a fancy Ford Explorers... So if one would be offered to me at $27,000 I would not be shocked or exited thinking I'm getting a greatest deal in the world...
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dglozman (Jul 31, 2006 6:47 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: dglozman (Jul 31, 2006 5:45 am) This is like saying 'ignorance of the law IS an excuse' but we all know and more importantly the courts rule that it isn't. jmonroe
|
|
|
Replying to: british_rover (Jul 31, 2006 6:51 am) I live outside of New York city were apartment prices (in Manhattan) are around 1 mil. But for me - they have to pay me 1 mil for me to even consider to live in Manhattan.. Like I said - different value to different people. |
|
|
Replying to: jmonroe (Jul 31, 2006 6:56 am) Have you ever heard stories about people buying priceless stuff at flea markets and garage sales?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dglozman (Jul 31, 2006 6:47 am) If you took this to court the court will try to determine what a reasonable person would believe and act accordingly. It wouldn't matter one bit to what you thought of the deal. In the example given the courts would have said "you should have known you couldn't get that brand new Rover for $27K". |
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Jul 31, 2006 7:06 am) Really? Have you heard of those crazy lawsuits that was won? (like famous McDonald coffee?)
|
|
|
Replying to: british_rover (Jul 31, 2006 6:51 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dglozman (Jul 31, 2006 7:22 am) We are talking contract law that is covered under the UCC (or like code adopted by state statues) not Tort law. The two are completely different animals. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Jul 31, 2006 7:06 am) This type of legal interpretation is there to protect everyone who enters into a contract. What if you bought a house and didn't notice that the final contract specified a price of 420K instead of 240K? Would you realy want to pay 200K extra just because you should have read more carefully?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Smart Shopper Stories from the Sales Frontlines
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
