You are here:
Forums
Smart Shopper
Stories from the Sales Frontlines

47326 messages, Last post on Nov 10, 2009 at 7:53 AM
You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Jul 24, 2006 5:26 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kirstie_h (Jul 24, 2006 6:48 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kirstie_h (Jul 24, 2006 6:48 am) I think the story about the sheetrock guy getting a big injury settlement kind of threw us for a loop (BTW....I've heard that same story in more than one place, from more than one person...).
|
|
|
Replying to: graphicguy (Jul 24, 2006 7:33 am) |
|
|
Replying to: chikoo (Jul 22, 2006 10:20 am) |
|
|
|
|
Here's the scenario... Customer walks in and you can tell within 5 minutes of qualifying that you will probably sell them a car. The problem is this is one of those customers that are very analytical, very picky (the type that will complain over the very smallest details of the car or the deal), over researched etc... You know you will sell them but won't make much more than a mini, nothing in F&I and that you will probably be living with them before and after the sale. If you been in the biz for a while you know what I am talking about. The customer that will take hours and hours of your time for little reward compared to the full lister that that you spend an hour with and they bring you home baked cookies the next day as a thank you. Do you go for the deal or do you back off and let them walk maybe purposely quoting them a high price or just not trying? Curious about this... I've gone back and forth with this question in my 15 years working at a high volume Toyota dealership. You want every deal but what's the limit. My answer is that I will sell them if I really really need the deal (EOM for a bonus etc...) Otherwise I cut bait and look for something better that won't end up costing me money in the long run by being off the floor.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: british_rover (Jul 22, 2006 3:18 pm) At the auto show, there was a torture track set up that a bunch of different Jeep models went around. It looked like the Commander did a fine job, but I'm sure would not hold up to the Range rover track.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: mazda6iguy (Jul 24, 2006 9:44 am) Or am I just mistaken about that?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dwilliam (Jul 14, 2006 5:55 am) Sheesh.... Are we sensing some ATTITUDE? You are right in your analysis, of course. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: mark156 (Jul 14, 2006 7:49 am) Keep in mind, if folks keep there cars until they are paid off, they will need continued service, parts, etc at the dealership. So, if the dealer was losing a little out front, they are going to pick it up out back. There are so many types of buyers that I think everything would fall into place. A person leasing ever two years, in a sense, has a paid off car and is ready for another I'm a little late to this party, but here goes.. Dwilliam's point: If people keep cars until they have positive equity, overall tax revenue would significantly reduce for the government. Mark/Snake's point: Not so. Now maybe snake's professor got the Nobel prize for his economic theory, but it's obvious that in general, if people started living within their means, the great state of the USA can only support about 1/2 the jobs it currently does. It's gluttonous consumption that keeps the economy afloat. (Maybe the professor got the Noble prize (not Nobel) )
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Smart Shopper
Stories from the Sales Frontlines
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats