Sign In Join 



Stories from the Sales Frontlines

47862 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 7:49 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying


Messages Page 2028 of 4787
1
...
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
...
4787
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#20268 of 47862
Re: Several Here. . . [kirstie_h] by richard64
Oct 29, 2007 (8:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: kirstie_h (Oct 29, 2007 7:56 am)

Very well, Party Pooper. I surrender. No more "fine" with grammar as you put it. Guess that means no more jokes, pictures, sports, etc. There's always one student in every class...
#20269 of 47862
Re: Question to guys in the Denver area [kyfdx] by british_rover
Oct 29, 2007 (8:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: kyfdx (Oct 29, 2007 8:52 am)

Turbos still lose power just not as fast as a NA engine does.
 
Some where on the web is a nice graph showing the relation of altitude to power loss with a turbo and NA motor.
#20270 of 47862
Re: #1000 [phinneas519] by richard64
Oct 29, 2007 (9:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: phinneas519 (Oct 29, 2007 7:51 am)

I totally agree with you, but the Hosts are shutting us down on the grammar issues here. Sorry.
#20271 of 47862
Re: Question to guys in the Denver area [kyfdx] by cdnpinhead
Oct 29, 2007 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: kyfdx (Oct 29, 2007 8:52 am)

Turbo speed is a function of the delta-P of the exhaust gas (& temperature, inlet parameters, & some other stuff, but the delta-P is the first-order driver) compared to the outside (ambient) air pressure.
 
At high altitude, the air pressure is lower & the turbo runs faster, which compresses the inlet charge more than it would at sea level, which is a good thing, because there's less of it to compress. It doesn't provide 100% of the power available at sea level standard (59 deg, 760mm of Hg, yada, yada) day, but it comes reasonably close & definitely is superior to a naturally-aspirated engine on those 11-12K foot mountain passes in CO.
 
OTOH, while you can get away with 85 octane gas in a NA engine that would require 91 at sea level, you've got to actually burn premium in a turbo.
#20272 of 47862
Re: How about this.. [greanpea68] by jmonroe
Oct 29, 2007 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: greanpea68 (Oct 29, 2007 7:57 am)

See, who needs spell check...lol
  
How does that make you feel grammar police.

 
That post was very easy for you to write; you were just writing naturally.
 
Does anyone know if they take out O2 sensors in Denver beacuse the air so thin?
 
I do, but after reading your essay, you’d never understand.
 
jmonroe
#20273 of 47862
Re: #1000 [richard64] by gogiboy
Oct 29, 2007 (9:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: richard64 (Oct 28, 2007 11:15 am)

Your "Burr" anecdote is a beauty. Have you ever read Richard Lederer's "World history through student bloopers? You should submit your story for any future revision. My favorite: Sir Francis Drake curcumicised the world with a hundred foot clipper. What an image!
 
Don't worry about your football player. My wife had one here at OSU in basic (remedial) composition. His paper kept making reference to the "offense of" this particular position. Turns out he didn't know that his own position was "offensive" lineman.
#20274 of 47862
OT by stickguy
Oct 29, 2007 (9:44 am)
Reply
I think I will go be obnoxious at a few car dealers, just to generate some story lines!
 
I do have to go to the Honda dealer tonight to drop of the van for service. Might have to wander into the showroom, if I can convince the wife to go take a test sit in a new Accord. No drives of course.
 
Hey, that's as close to a sales story as this thread has come in quite a while!
#20275 of 47862
Re: How about this.. [jmonroe] by greanpea68
Oct 29, 2007 (9:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: jmonroe (Oct 29, 2007 9:32 am)

I guess that means I'll have to walk out and ask the master techs in the shop.
#20276 of 47862
Re: My next prediction.... [mackabee] by laurasdada
Oct 29, 2007 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: mackabee (Oct 28, 2007 9:27 pm)

I believe that you have the teams correct, but the outcome incorrect....
 
Unless there's a sea change, the AFC (read: Patriots) shall win the Super Bowl. As for the Pats running the table, possible but I wouldn't be surprised (or concerned) should they drop a game or two. Just not sure (other than Indy) who can beat 'em. I think they can only beat themselves...
#20277 of 47862
Re: Holy cow! [richard64] by jmonroe
Oct 29, 2007 (10:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: richard64 (Oct 28, 2007 8:14 pm)

PLEASE---we are in mourning at this house!
 
You had me confused with that word (mourning). Since you wrote your post at 12:14 AM, I couldn’t understand why you were telling us what part of the day it was where you live, because nobody brought up that subject. It seemed like such a matter of fact thingy since most people, wherever they live, sleep during the wee hours of the morning and nobody gives it a second thought. Then I realized you pulled a homonym on me.
 
jmonroe

Messages Page 2028 of 4787
1
...
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
...
4787
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement