782 messages,
Last post on Feb 25, 2009 at 1:24 PM
You are in the
Honda CR-V Forum.
What is this discussion about?
Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4, Subaru Forester, SUV
Feb 23, 2009 (11:23 am)
Whenever the brakes are applied in “Auto” or ”Lock” mode, 4WD is cancelled to optimize the benefits of ABS and enhanced Vehicle Stability Control (VSC).
Sounds very part-time-ish to me.
Just like Hyundai.
Feb 25, 2009 (10:31 am)
Also take note that some of the world's fastest cars (Porsche 911 Turbo, Nissan GT-R, Bugatti Veyron, etc.) all employ full-time AWD. Now granted, those cars are in a much different league, but the point is the "performance" benefits of full-time AWD do trickle down to more mundane vehicles as well.
Those vehicles are primarily RWD, or the AWD unit favors RWD unless there is complete slippage, even then, I don't think they send more than 50% to the front.
Toyota, Audi, Honda, Hyundai.... are primarily FWD vehicles.
The addition of power to he front wheels in a RWD vehicle yields advantage, than addition of power to the rear wheels in a FWD vehicle.
#781 of 782 Re: [blueiedgod]
by oregonboy
Feb 25, 2009 (11:33 am)
The addition of power to he front wheels in a RWD vehicle yields (greater?) advantage, than addition of power to the rear wheels in a FWD vehicle.
For every rule there is an exception. May I nominate the WRX STi and/or Mitsubishi Evo?
#782 of 782 Re: [blueiedgod]
by rsholland
Feb 25, 2009 (1:24 pm)
They're all full-time AWD, with a RWD bias, usually around 30/70 - 40/60, front/rear. That F/R bias may shift, depending on driving conditions.
Bob