Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Honda CR-V Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4 or Subaru Forester?
782 messages, Last post on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:24 PM
You are in the Honda CR-V Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: rengaw (Feb 08, 2009 12:52 am) Getting the V6 also gets you a 5 speed auto, but I'm not sure you'll like the transmission as much as you liked the 4 speed auto in the 4 banger, because it hesitates and lags a bit. I'm glad they updated the 4 banger because the V6 sort of made the prior 4 cylinder moot.
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 09, 2009 10:09 am) I was wondering, Juice, what kind of mpg you are getting with your van? And what would the weight difference be comparing the van to the RAV with the V6. I believe the RAV4 goes something like 3700lbs.
|
|
|
Replying to: rengaw (Feb 09, 2009 7:32 pm)  
|
|
|
Replying to: rengaw (Feb 09, 2009 7:32 pm) Seems like our experiences have been identical. We were 99% set on the Forester, and then the new RAV came out. Last year, the four-cylinder just did not do enough for me, either in terms of mileage or "peppiness." I didn't want the 6, so I moved on to the Forester. When the new, larger 4-cylinder came out in the RAV, I just had to try it--and I really liked it. So we got ourselves one last month. I'd say there is no "need" for the V6, unless you are towing regularly. If you are doing mostly highway, then the benefit of the I4 is pretty modest, except for the lower upfront cost...But you already know all this. Good luck in your choice.
|
|
|
Replying to: rengaw (Feb 09, 2009 7:32 pm) My average is usually anywhere from 22 to 28 mpg or so. Not bad considering it's always hauling people or cargo or both. Mileage drops considerably if you punch it, but then again it can be a lot higher if you're a hyper-miler. YMMV. I'll say this - the V6 has way more than enough power for this van, I can't imagine how it would feel in the lighter RAV4. You may actually complain about substantial torque steer, especially if you get a FWD RAV4. You may even prefer the I-4 if you get FWD. My van is about 4300 lbs, a FWD LE 8 passenger model. You sure the RAV4 is that light? AWD V6? Our Forester does a bit better, but it's AWD and a 4 cylinder PZEV model. I've seen anywhere from 23mpg up to 33mpg, again that would be keeping speeds down. Overall it gets a couple of mpg better than the van, plus it's AWD, but the van is much bigger, too.
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 10, 2009 11:44 am) I asked a salesman at the local Toyota dealer last week what the number one complaint on the V6 RAV was. He said torque steer on the FWD model.
|
|
|
Replying to: rengaw (Feb 10, 2009 7:12 pm)  I drove from Florida to DC with 6 people and luggage, but all that weight and higher speeds (my dad hit 90mph at one point, whoa) than usual hurt my numbers. I still managed 24mpg. My sister drove my dad's Outback and they got slightly better mileage, but they were also carrying less weight (2 people and luggage). I think they got about 27mpg. Thing is, the gas tank in the Outback is much smaller (16.9 gal vs. 21), so that's what limited our range. How big is the RAV4's tank? I think it's smaller than the Forester and Outback (both 16.9 gal). That might limit range. I hate having to stop for gas. One time we were running on empty and had to stop, and ended up seeing gas 30 cents cheaper less than an hour later. If the small gas tank had not forced us to stop, we would have paid far less for gas. That may be a reason to go with the I-4.
|
|
|
|
| My wife 07 Rav4 4 cyc is kind of noisy engine in cold start warm-up, and wind noise on highway speed. | |
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 11, 2009 8:18 am) I have a Ford F150 which has two tanks and gives me something like 36 gallons. I previously had an F150 with a single 21 gallon tank. Now when you are getting 14 mpg with a 21 gallon tank, it literally seems as if you are stopping at every station. But filling up that 36 gallon tank when fuel was higher than it presently is, would extract $120 from my wallet at a time. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kkrtrek (Feb 09, 2009 9:17 pm) I was leaning towards the CR-V, but I like to have a bit more power. The V6 RAV-4 and the Forrester Turbo appear to be competitors. In comparing the turbo Forrester and the V6 RAV-4, the main difference appears to be the requirement to use premium fuel in the turbo. Three questions: 1. Can someone comment on the appropriate octane, and whether one could use 87 or 89 octane? 2. Has anyone test drove the turbo and the V6? Are they close? 3. Has anyone considered comparing a Outback V6 with a RAV4 V6? Thanks in advance.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Honda CR-V Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4 or Subaru Forester?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda CR-V
2011 Toyota RAV4
2010 Subaru Forester
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
