Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Honda CR-V Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4 or Subaru Forester?
782 messages, Last post on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:24 PM
You are in the Honda CR-V Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
I am in the market for a compact 4WD for the ski season so looking ath 09 Forester, Rav4 and CRV. So far I like the styling of the forester and the power of the Rav4 V6  The Forester 2.5X does feel quite sluggish to me. I wonder how it will handle in the mountains (Lake Tahoe in my case) during the ski season... Does anyone have experience with either of these cars (base 4-cyl models) in mountain + snow conditions and how well they perform. |
|
|
Replying to: driverboy (Jun 28, 2006 9:13 pm) Speaking from experience in the Reno to Carson City commute I can tell you that my 03 Forester X has saved my butt several times in terms of excellent braking, handling/maneuverability under braking, very good visibility without a camera, and excellent AWD capabilities in fair and foul weather. The car has 90K miles with zero problems and performs as good as new still. I find the power delivery to be good enough and not what I’d call sluggish. All three on your short list would be good. Remember that Subaru is full time AWD while the other two are FWD biased with reactive AWD. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
Replying to: 10years (Dec 28, 2008 12:39 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: driverboy (Jun 28, 2006 9:13 pm) We wanted the best possible mileage and range, so we looked at base 4 cylinder engines. The Forester has the biggest gas tank in this class (16.9 gallons, surprisingly enough the same size as the Tribeca!) combined with good mileage, and before you say Escape Hybrid that interior didn't come close to meeting my standards (we actually looked at the Mercury version). Any how, with expectations for that class, I found the Forester very responsive. We did get the 175hp PZEV model, which is $300 or so extra, but you get 5hp plus it's cleaner and greener. In PZEV states the emissions warranty covers your catalytic converter for 150k miles, too. That base engine has fairly high compression and AVCS valve timing, plus shorter gearing than the Forester XT, so we actually find it responsive. Specifically you feel it move immediately as you hit the gas pedal. It's not fast, but merely quick and responsive, if I'm explaining it properly. I have that V6/5 speed powertrain from the RAV4 in my minivan, and it's the opposite. It takes a bit longer to respond, especially for the transmission to pick the right gear, but once it does, it's quite fast. So not as responsive, but faster once you get going. I hope that's clear. |
|
|
Replying to: driverboy (Jun 28, 2006 9:13 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: bodble2 (Dec 29, 2008 1:25 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: bodble2 (Dec 29, 2008 1:25 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Jan 09, 2009 11:48 am) Did you consider the Highlander? That would be essentially a bigger RAV4, without going all the way to a minivan. And you could also have one hybrid with the Highlander.
|
|
|
Replying to: driverboy (Jun 28, 2006 9:13 pm) Compare the interior look of the forester and rav4 and the forester looks cheaper. lighter thinner material and not as comfortable. good luck. forester or rav4 are both good. |
|
|
Replying to: bodble2 (Jan 09, 2009 5:25 pm) Not to mention, the Sienna is cheaper and much bigger than the HL. So you get more for less $, much better value. The fact that minivans' image is bad helped me tremendously - you get great deals on them. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Honda CR-V Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4 or Subaru Forester?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda CR-V
2011 Toyota RAV4
2010 Subaru Forester
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
