Sign In Join 



Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4 or Subaru Forester?

782 messages,  Last post on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Honda CR-V Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4, Subaru Forester, SUV


Messages Page 6 of 79
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#51 of 782
Thanks by little3
Feb 14, 2006 (9:12 am)
Reply
Thanks for your responses. I appreciate your information especially in that it is "real world" experience. One last question: why does Honda have a soft sided cover for the spare unlike the RAV4's hard cover. Does it really save that much money? Thanks again.
#52 of 782
Re: Thanks [little3] by varmint
Feb 14, 2006 (10:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: little3 (Feb 14, 2006 9:12 am)

Cost savings would be my assumption, but there's no real evidence. Honda does offer a hard cover as an accessory through the dealers (costly). It is also standard equipment on the SE trim.
#53 of 782
Re: rav4 sport [blueiedgod] by thegraduate
Feb 14, 2006 (11:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: blueiedgod (Feb 10, 2006 4:22 am)

No matter what engine you stick in there, if there is no clutch, it ain't no performance car, but a grocery getter.
 
So, the Mercedes E55 isn't performance oriented, with its 5-speed auto? 469 hp seems to "perform" pretty well.
 
Just b/c an auto is in it, does not mean it isn't a performance car. If any of these SUVs are credited as a performance car, I will eat my hat, anyways.
#54 of 782
Re: Looking at CRV & RAV4 [little3] by stevedebi
Feb 14, 2006 (12:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: little3 (Feb 13, 2006 8:21 am)

"How often do you actually move from the front seat to the rear seat in the CRV? "
 
When the CR-V is really packed to the gills on long vacations, I open the glass window and stuff in more loose items. Just remember to pull them back out via the window - if you open the door it will all spill out! So yes, it is useful...
#55 of 782
Re: Looking at CRV & RAV4 [little3] by stevedebi
Feb 14, 2006 (12:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: little3 (Feb 13, 2006 8:21 am)

"How often do you actually use the flip open rear window in the CRV?"
 
When the CR-V is really packed to the gills on long vacations, I open the glass window and stuff in more loose items. Just remember to pull them back out via the window - if you open the door it will all spill out! So yes, it is useful...
#56 of 782
Re: Looking at CRV & RAV4 [little3] by saabgirl
Feb 14, 2006 (7:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: little3 (Feb 13, 2006 8:21 am)

How often do you actually use the flip open rear window in the CRV?
 
Regularly. In fact, the Subaru, RAV4 and CR-V were so close in the test drive that the flip up window, ample ground clearance and easily accessible tie downs underneath were features that persuaded me the Honda would be easiest to live with. My kayak easily fits inside the CR-V with a couple feet sticking out the rear window. No need to wrestle it up on the roof at the end of a day's paddling.
 
Also, I thought the CR-V had less road rumble than the RAV4, not that I'd describe either vehicle as quiet.
 
But the good news for buyers is that it's hard to make a truly bad choice in this class of vehicle.
#57 of 782
Re: Wrong Safety Info [musictaps] by p0926
Feb 21, 2006 (10:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: musictaps (Feb 07, 2006 2:06 am)

Needless to say you have to be really careful with the IIHS ratings. They will rate a car good, even though it has some bad scores for things like head and pelvis protection.
 
Ah! I love it when someone selectively uses statistics to prove a point. In fact, the Forester performed the best "overall" in the IIHS's tests. Yes there were a couple of specific areas where it only received an acceptable rating but compare that to the "overall" POOR rating that the CRV received for rear impact protection: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/summary.aspx?class=58
 
However, if safety is truly an overriding concern, I'd go with a full-size sedan or a minivan
 
-Frank
#58 of 782
Re: Wrong Safety Info [p0926] by blueiedgod
Feb 21, 2006 (1:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: p0926 (Feb 21, 2006 10:15 am)

However, if safety is truly an overriding concern, I'd go with a full-size sedan or a minivan
 
Hummer H1
Suburban
Escalade
Excursion
#59 of 782
Re: Wrong Safety Info [blueiedgod] by thecat
Feb 21, 2006 (1:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: blueiedgod (Feb 21, 2006 1:01 pm)

Hey, why not an M-1 Abrams tank!
It will take a direct hit from a R.P.G.
#60 of 782
Re: Wrong Safety Info [thecat] by tidester HOST
Feb 21, 2006 (1:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thecat (Feb 21, 2006 1:36 pm)

I suppose if you could afford one you could handle the fuel cost of 3 GALLONS PER MILE - to say nothing of maintenance and upkeep. Offsetting that, of course, is the advantage of not having to worry about finding a parking spot.
 
tidester, host

Messages Page 6 of 79
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement