Mazda MX-5 Miata vs Honda S2000

Replying to: accelerator (Aug 31, 2007 8:04 am)

You didn't sound like that at all, no problem.
 
Actually the cup holder annoys me a little, too. Not a deal killer, but the door panel could definitely have been better designed.
 
Does the S2000 take premium fuel? Miata does.
 
I have a '93 Miata and it's turned out to be an efficient little commuter. I get about 27-28mpg on plain old regular. Mazda now wants 91 octane for the 2006+ models, actually they've recommended premium since the 2000 model IIRC.

Replies to this message:
• accelerator (Aug 31, 2007 10:09 am)
  • ateixeira (Sep 04, 2007 8:10 am)
    • accelerator (Sep 04, 2007 8:32 am) and 3 more...
  • habitat1 (Sep 07, 2007 3:28 pm)
• aviboy97 (Sep 01, 2007 7:57 am)

Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 31, 2007 9:21 am)

Yeah, it does take Premium. I get nearly 300 miles on a tank and I believe the tank is 12.5 gallons. After the break-in was completed, I visit the VTEC range pretty regularly and I'm seeing well over 23-25mpg with top down. I understand the top down reduces fuel efficiency by about 1-2mpg... Is that the same on the Miata? 23-25 is huge increase from my previous vehicle which avg. 16-17mpg. Frankly, I'm willing to sacrifice the 1-2mpg for the top down experience since I'm still coming out ahead! Once the ozone is gone, I'll drive a hard top.
 
My bigest complaint about ANY convertible is the crap that seems to find its way into my left eye. I guess I need better sunglasses.
 
Oh, and being able to see underneath the 18-wheeler next to me is a little discearning but I digress.

Replies to this message:
• ateixeira (Sep 04, 2007 8:10 am)
  • accelerator (Sep 04, 2007 8:32 am)
    • ateixeira (Sep 04, 2007 8:35 am)
    • estreka (Sep 04, 2007 5:05 pm) and 1 more...
• habitat1 (Sep 07, 2007 3:28 pm)

Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 31, 2007 9:21 am)

Replying to: accelerator (Aug 31, 2007 10:09 am)

Replies to this message:
• accelerator (Sep 04, 2007 8:32 am)
  • ateixeira (Sep 04, 2007 8:35 am)
  • estreka (Sep 04, 2007 5:05 pm)
    • ateixeira (Sep 05, 2007 7:23 am)

Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 04, 2007 8:10 am)

For me (in Texas), top goes up if the temp is higher than 94 and if it is cooler than ... oh wait, I have hit a low yet. Haven't had the car long enought to experience any low temperatures yet.

Replies to this message:
• ateixeira (Sep 04, 2007 8:35 am)
• estreka (Sep 04, 2007 5:05 pm)
  • ateixeira (Sep 05, 2007 7:23 am)

Replying to: accelerator (Sep 04, 2007 8:32 am)

Even that hot, I'll run the A/C, but the top still does down!

Replying to: accelerator (Sep 04, 2007 8:32 am)

Sorry about the size. I felt compelled to show the thoughts of S2K owners.

Replies to this message:
• ateixeira (Sep 05, 2007 7:23 am)

Replying to: estreka (Sep 04, 2007 5:05 pm)

My hair line is receeding quickly enough that I'll be N/H soon enough!

Replying to: accelerator (Aug 31, 2007 10:09 am)

Replying to: haasamanizer (May 22, 2007 9:28 pm)

...If you want a car that feels like a roadster, with quick precise response in the gas and brake pedals, as well as handling, i highly advise the MX-5. However, if you are looking for something a bit quicker with a few more standard options, fancy buttons, and a higher class feel, the S2K is by far the way to go....
 
I agree with this except for "more standard options, fancy buttons"... An MX-5 GT offers heated seats, fog lights, 6-disc changer, steering wheel radio controls, tilt wheel, side air bags and advanced keyless entry. Just off the top of my head... None of these features are even available as options in the S2k. Tha Mazda easily beats the Honda when it comes to "standard options and fancy buttons". (the Honda does offer an outside temp gauge.. )

Replies to this message:
• accelerator (Oct 15, 2007 7:22 am)
  • ateixeira (Oct 23, 2007 11:55 am)
    • estreka (Oct 23, 2007 12:34 pm)
    • accelerator (Oct 23, 2007 12:40 pm) and 6 more...