You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Mazda Miata
Mazda MX-5 Miata vs Honda S2000

62 messages, Last post on May 22, 2009 at 5:52 AM
You are in the Mazda Miata Forum. Your Host is claires
|
Replying to: logic1 (Jan 30, 2006 8:41 am) I have to disagree. If you are comparing the S2000 to the Boxster S, perhaps. The Boxster S can achieve similar performance as the S2000 at a quieter 7,000 rpm. And it's got a lot more sound insulation and cabin amenities. But the S2000 can be casually driven and still significantly exceed the performance of a Miata. The 6,500 to 9,000 range in the rev band is a "bonus". You don't have to use it if you don't want to on your daily commute.
|
|
|
Replying to: habitat1 (Feb 01, 2006 4:03 pm) The Honda definitely left my Miata in the dust. But I did not come out of it with the feeling I wanted to drive it stop and go. Possibly if I actually drove one stop and go, I would change my mind. |
|
|
Replying to: sjde (Jan 30, 2006 8:22 am) |
|
|
Replying to: sjde (Jan 30, 2006 8:22 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: sjde (Jan 30, 2006 8:22 am) We have a 2006 Mazda MX-5 (Miata to the uninformed or to the naked eye seeing one drive by) and I have a guy whom lives right behind me who just sold a S2000 not long ago and is thinking about getting a MX-5. Anyways, the one thing that he loves most about the MX-5 compared to the S2000 is that you are not so cooped up in it, as in you can just put your arm on the window sills and drive and truly feel the convertible aspect of the car as he puts it. He says that he wanted to hang his arm out the window or down the side of the car when he drove (his left arm obviously) but he was unable to do it in the S2000 because of the doors came way too high as compared the where he was sitting, and he explained how it just wasn't how he wanted it to be. Now one thing I do know is that Honda traditionally makes a better automobile than does Mazda and with much higher quality! If it were me, although I am truly satisfied with the MX-5, I would probably go with a new S2000 if I had the money and didn't care about the price difference... The only thing I can say I dislike about the MX-5 is the standard sound system has absolutely no bass as I came from a 2003 Ford Mustang GT with a Mach 460 Sound system in it with 2 stock subwoofers in it (not the best for subs but upped the bass a bit). Anyways, do whatcha please but that's what I know and how I feel! With whatever your decision finally ends up being, enjoy the ride and drive safe! Michael Hunter |
|
|
Replying to: iancar (Oct 26, 2006 7:56 pm) You are more than a little off, in my opinion. The 7-year old S2000 still holds it's own very well against the current Porsche Boxster and even Boxster S. The braking on the S2000 was second (barely) to my current 911S. The steering and gearbox are second to none. The structural rigidity of the S2000 is similarly as good as the best of the current crop of $40,000-$50,000+ roadsters. On another forum, one can see the S2000 consistently beats 400 horsepower Corvettes on the track circuit. I find it refreshing that Honda was able to design a ground up roadster in 1999 that, thanks to a lot of Formula One experience and engineering, is still at the top of its category in 2006. If and when they redesign the S2000, they have a damn tough act to follow and, hopefully, won't take two steps forward and one back. And a riced up FWD Si is hopefully NOT the target they will take aim at. |
|
| I had a 00 S2000 for 4 years and almost 50k miles... I now have a 07 PRHT MX-5. Several comments have been dead on... I still think the s2000 is a classic design that much like the NSX will stand the test of time. That being said when I got ready to buy another little red sports car... I had to consider the fact that my 12 year old will be getting close to driving age and what ever I bought would have to be a vehicle I would feel safe with him driving ... if only with me in the car with him. the S2000 is not that car. the reason it can hold it's own with boxsters and many more expensive cars is because it is a very high performing sports car that was intended to be used by experienced drivers. the MX-5 is my commuter and is about 7/10th the car the S was... it is great fun, safe yet it is still a proper sports car. the retractible hard top is a work of art and a joy to use. the 6 speed snick snicks... not quite up to s2000 or boxster standards... but if you have not driven either of those cars... you would think it is the greatest tranny ever!! Also I actually think the S was better in traffic... 3rd gear was good from 15mph to 90mph!! the MX-5 does well tho' and given a nice road ... will make you forget most other cars. | |
|
The Miata is a much easier car to drive in a controlled manner especially for those new to driving or RWD. The Miata's insurance should be cheaper too. I would definitely make sure that the airbags were working if you bought an older Miata as my previous '94 had a airbag malfunction light constatly on. Overall I think the Miata is the most underrated sports car from the perspective of the non-enthusiats general public.
|
|
|
Replying to: gsolman6 (Mar 12, 2007 9:27 am) I would agree with you. The MX-5 is has a lot of respect in the tuning and racing world. Heck, it has it's own racing circuit (MX-5 Cup). It also has the perception of a "chick" car, when in fact, the majority of the buyers are male. It may not be as fast as a S2000, but it's way less expensive, loads of fun to drive(CR's most fun to drive pick of 2007), economical and cheap to insure. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Mazda Miata
Mazda MX-5 Miata vs Honda S2000
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MX-5 Miata



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats