Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles Mazda Miata Mazda MX-5 Miata vs Honda S2000
62 messages, Last post on May 22, 2009 at 5:52 AM
You are in the Mazda Miata Forum. Your Host is claires
|
If you're considering these vehicles but unsure which one you want, you need to determine what you want it for. Both cars offer their own respective benefits and one must determine what those are before deciding. The best way to decide is to drive both and see which fits you (or your husband). The S can be a tight fit, but there's tons of headroom. The Miata is roomier, but the seat doesn't support your legs properly. I own an '01 S2K and my best friend just bought an '06 Mazdaspeed Miata. We agree that my S is the better all around car (I must disclaim, my S is supercharged, but nonetheless...). Fit'n'finish, power, convienence, styling, and resale are all in favor of the S. We both found his Miata to have poor build quality (the interior was surprisingly plastic, even the door panels). The thing is, the S will scare you at limit at first. Where the Miata is a tossable car, the S is much harder to master. Day-to-day though, they're both quite dossile. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: estreka (Jun 24, 2007 9:24 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Jun 20, 2007 11:15 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: danjakubik (Jun 24, 2007 9:35 am) While any Jeep is rather expensive, it's still a good buy. Jeep owners are a very niche market which keeps resale values high. You might buy a used Wrangler for $17K and sell it in 4 years for $12K. They hold their value remarkably well as long as they're well maintained. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the information. I was told there is a 2.5L engine version of the Wrangler, instead of the usual 4.0L. Fuel economy should be better with the smaller engine. Any feedback about the smaller 2.5L engine?
|
|
|
Replying to: danjakubik (Jun 25, 2007 12:38 am) It will be more practical if you can only keep one car, however. I'd head over to a Jeep thread to ask your question. |
|
|
Replying to: estreka (Jun 24, 2007 9:24 am) Build quality is how well the parts fit, and are put together as well as how long they stay that way. Not the material used. The Miata has really good build quality. It is possible that the Miata uses more plastic then the S2000. Keep in mind, buying an S2000, you also pay for the use of better materials. Brand new fully loaded Mazdaspeed MX-5's went for $27,000. An S2000 started over $3000 more then that. In a sense, comparing materials in these two vehicles is like comparing the materials used in a loaded Honda Accord vs. Acura TL. Big difference....
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jun 25, 2007 7:33 am) Don't get me wrong, I love the Miata (I refuse to call it the MX-5). If I couldn't afford the S, I definately would have considered a Miata.
|
|
|
Replying to: estreka (Jun 25, 2007 12:14 pm) If I could afford the S2000, I would buy on over the Miata as well. And I am a Mazda enthusiast and owner... |
|
|
Replying to: estreka (Jun 24, 2007 9:24 am) The MSM is basically the same interior as any other Miata. A few sporty touches. Big difference is the turbo and suspension. Plastics aren't Lexus quality, but everyone I've seen has been well put together. Plastics in the S2k are about the same to me. Also, very well put together. S2K is a better true sports car, but I find the MSM to be a much easier day to day car. S2K is better on the track. To me, you've got two different cars at different price points. Both are great cars. I'm somebody who looks at the dollar/fun value, so my choice would be the MSM.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles Mazda Miata Mazda MX-5 Miata vs Honda S2000
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
