Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?
8691 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 1:39 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 05, 2009 11:48 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 05, 2009 11:48 am) Accent is pretty roomy inside too, though not as much as a Versa or Cube. Same with Elantra (ESPECIALLY the Touring). it's really impressive how much room Hyundai and Nissan have put into the interiors of these smaller vehicles. |
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Aug 05, 2009 11:57 am) Let me check their Chevy store, same dealer also sells Aveos... Bummer! None in stock. Still, at anywhere near Sonata money I'd run not walk away from an Aveo. |
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 05, 2009 12:03 pm) 
|
|
|
Replying to: tifighter (Aug 05, 2009 12:19 pm) 
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Aug 05, 2009 11:57 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Aug 05, 2009 4:02 pm) So, for about $1000 more TMV, you can get a Honda Fit. Would that Fit have a sunroof though? Only personal reference point I have is a friend of mine recently picked up a new 2009 Honda Civic EX-L sedan for $20,000, out the door. Well, when you figure that $16,500 Aveo could probably run around $17,500 once you factor in taxes, tags, etc, I'd say the Civic for $2500 more is worth it. Real leather, a bit roomier (even if you lose the versatility of a hatchback), peppier engine, more economical, and most likely a much safer car. And REAL leather, versus a facsimile...albeit a good fascimile! I still have a gut feeling though, that the hypothetical $16.5K TMV Aveo is rolling out the door at somewhat less than that, though.
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Aug 05, 2009 4:30 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Aug 05, 2009 4:32 pm) For some reason though, the $20K that my friend's Civic cost didn't really faze me. I guess because it was just about fully loaded. I think it had everything but Nav. In comparison, my 2000 Intrepid would have been around $21,100 out the door if I hadn't bought that extended warranty that I never had to use. But, it's also 9 model years later, and that Civic has a few things my car doesn't, like leather, sunroof, ABS, alloys, probably a better sound system, fold-down rear seat, and probably a few more airbags. As much as we gripe about the high price of today's cars, I imagine that, once you factor in all the standard features, performance, etc, they're actually a bit of a bargain compared to days gone by. |
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 05, 2009 12:03 pm) Dude, you're evil for mentioning fitzmall! I just went to their website and found a 2008 Charger 3.5 with something like 19K miles for $13.9K! I was actually a bit tempted, until I read the description, and it said the color was beige. $15,827 for a new Sonata is definitely a lot of car for the money. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan Versa
2010 Toyota Yaris
2010 Honda Fit
2009 smart fortwo
2010 MINI Cooper
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
