You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?

8564 messages, Last post on Oct 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: qbrozen (Jun 04, 2008 2:05 pm) So, no issues with the AWD...
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: british_rover (Jun 04, 2008 1:52 pm) Years of weekend commuting to the NJ Shore on the Atlantic City Expressway, where the speed limit was 70, proved that to be true. 80+mph at night...or 50+mph in heavy traffic noticeably reduced gas mileage in my Ford Galaxie 500. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegreatoz (Jun 04, 2008 10:29 am) Now that IS a refreshing perspective coming from a Suburban driver! Personally I think 40 mpg is decent and 50 mpg is very good, FOR NOW. In five years 40 will be my new floor, and I will be looking to be making 50 mpg routinely, OR MORE. Preferably more. Automakers had better have something in the works. And sadly, with the HUGE run-up in diesel prices, a run-up that has been much faster and much greater than the one in gas, it appears that diesels will NOT be the quick fix to our problems that I had hoped. It is good to have them anyway because of the fuel they conserve, but with prices so much higher than gas, they don't save any money vs a reasonably efficient gasser. I really think it is time for all these small cars that exist globally to start offering at least one smaller-engine option like they have in other countries... |
|
|
Replying to: kyfdx (Jun 04, 2008 6:12 pm) This is what triggered my mpg thoughts: hpmctorque, "Will Narrower Tires With Wider Sidewalls Return, To Improve Fuel Economy?" #1, 4 Jun 2008 12:07 am |
|
|
Replying to: kyfdx (Jun 04, 2008 6:12 pm) Of course, in that case, I wouldn't call it "compact." After all, a compact car isn't merely narrow. ;P |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kyfdx (Jun 04, 2008 6:12 pm) I think there are plenty of vehicles with larger more powerful engines that will have better MPG at 65+ but the LR3 is just not one of them. It's Cd is .41 in stock form with the air suspension at normal height and that is just not that great. |
|
|
|
|
"· Best-ever Honda Fit sales. Honda sold 8,205 Fit models, breaking the previous record of 6,835 set in April 2007. May sales were 47.4 percent higher than May 2007, causing year-to-date sales to soar by 61.5 percent." http://www.autoobserver.com/2008/06/big-three-big-vehicles-taken-to-the-watershe- - - d-in-may.html#more Good stuff, those little cars. Edit...wow, Accent was up 89% too! And..."Mini doesn't need much help right now: May sales rose 52 percent, and sales of the small, fuel-efficient, premium vehicles year-to-date are up 36 percent" |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (May 28, 2008 1:25 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegreatoz (Jun 03, 2008 3:13 pm) Driving the same trip (on the turnpike, though) in my 2000 Town & Country (also an E85 vehicle), I got over 22mpg calculated on paper...using my XM, GPS, and A/C....and hauling a vending machine at above legal speeds. There are better ways to travel than in an SUV.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys, I could use some advice over in the Versa Prices Paid Forum. Please follow the link if you are familiar with pricing here. My folks are interested in this car, and their dealer isn't communicating well. Thanks a lot! |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan Versa
2010 Toyota Yaris
2010 Honda Fit
2009 smart fortwo
2010 MINI Cooper



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats