You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?

8678 messages, Last post on Dec 03, 2009 at 8:55 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: nippononly (Apr 02, 2008 9:31 am) That's a pet peeve of mine, compounded by the bozos who get their trucks "lifted"
|
|
|
|
LOL....I was limiting my rant to just huge SUV's, but, now that you show that picture! Excess, right down to the size of the...ummm...never mind.
|
|
|
Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Apr 02, 2008 10:48 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Apr 02, 2008 11:14 am) |
|
|
|
resets us again, right back to...subcompact automobiles. Would you consider a Model T a subcompact, BTW?
|
|
|
Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Apr 02, 2008 11:32 am) Well their wheelbase was around 100", and overall length was about 165". So yeah, definitely subcompact.
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Apr 03, 2008 5:14 am) Today, it will get 22-25 miles to the gallon and because of the suspension height and small tires it goes off road just fine. And does up to 50 mph on the road It could go just about anywhere 99% of these SUVs could go. Remember, when this thing was built there were virtually no asphalt or concrete roads in America. With all the supposed technology today.... We cannot build a 4wd today thats gets better gas mileage than a model T? Please... We are high on horsepower...
|
|
Smart crash test results are in (Straightline)
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Apr 04, 2008 7:27 am) I'm surprised it got 5 stars in that side impact, look at the intrusion. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Apr 04, 2008 7:27 am)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan Versa
2010 Toyota Yaris
2010 Honda Fit
2009 smart fortwo
2010 MINI Cooper



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic