Sign In Join 



What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?

8564 messages,  Last post on Oct 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Nissan Versa, Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit, smart fortwo, MINI Cooper


Messages Page 648 of 857
1
...
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
...
857
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6464 of 8564
Re: Those are a lot of straws to be grasping at. [ttai] by lilengineerboy
Dec 07, 2007 (4:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: ttai (Dec 06, 2007 8:51 pm)

I actually like the Smart for it's cool, small fun size. It's kinda like a go kart with
a roof.

 
I would say its more like a ATV or quad with a roof. I think there is a perception that a go-cart handles well, is low to the ground, and eh mid-engined. I think the Fiero/MR2 fit the bill better than the Smart, and the Fiero was originally designed for the same niche market.
 
I had a motorcycle so taking this thing on the freeway is no problem for
me.

 
A motorcycle has the ability to maneuver out of trouble and can go from 0-60 in 1/3 the time of the Smart, leaving a lot of options to, as my driving instructor would say, "be somewhere else."
#6465 of 8564
Re: Those are a lot of straws to be grasping at. [ttai] by snakeweasel
Dec 07, 2007 (5:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: ttai (Dec 06, 2007 8:51 pm)

What kind of government creative accounting is this?
 
Its not governmental accounting its basic statistics. In cases like this you become very critical of extreme highs or lows in reporting something like this as abnormalities. People can misremember, calculate wrong, have wrong facts or just outright lie. When something lies way outside the norm, say like everyone reporting between 32 and 36 MPG and someone comes along and reports 42MPG you should look at the 42 with suspect.
 
Either way the Smart does really beat the Yaris by a long shot if it gets what the Canadian website claims.
 
$12K for a car that does everything I need it to do and gets above 40 city sounds like a winner in my book.
#6466 of 8564
Re: Those are a lot of straws to be grasping at. [robertsmx] by snakeweasel
Dec 07, 2007 (5:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: robertsmx (Dec 06, 2007 10:26 pm)

Per the Canadian website the Smart uses 5.9 liters per 100 Kilometers resulting in about 40 MPG city
 
Per the EPA website the Fit gets 34 Highway.
 
big difference.
 
But we will see when we get the EPA estiments
#6467 of 8564
Re: Interesting Discussion! [boaz47] by dgecho1
Dec 07, 2007 (5:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Dec 06, 2007 4:17 pm)

you're right! Buy the biggest, most bloated SUV possible...drive any way you want to...waste it if you want like there is not tomorrow..after all, we are AMERICANS..and, can do whatever we want!
#6468 of 8564
Re: Those are a lot of straws to be grasping at. [snakeweasel] by lilengineerboy
Dec 07, 2007 (6:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: snakeweasel (Dec 07, 2007 5:03 am)

$12K for a car that does everything I need it to do and gets above 40 city sounds like a winner in my book.
 
I too think that would be great, unfortunately the Smart isn't that car for me. I think a 3-5 year old VW TDI would be a lot closer for me, especially since the hwy mileage is a bigger factor for me than city.
#6469 of 8564
Re: Those are a lot of straws to be grasping at. [snakeweasel] by dromedarius
Dec 07, 2007 (7:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: snakeweasel (Dec 06, 2007 6:59 pm)

You're comparing Canadian mileage figures for the smart to American mileage figures for the Fit and/or Yaris but isn't the Canadian gallon larger???
 
 
#6470 of 8564
No... by bumpy
Dec 07, 2007 (7:48 am)
Reply
5.9 L/100 km is 39.875 miles per US gallon
#6471 of 8564
Re: Interesting Discussion! [boaz47] by dromedarius
Dec 07, 2007 (7:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Dec 06, 2007 4:17 pm)

I completely agree w/you regarding the smart; I can't see it being a practical purchase for 99.5% of the US population.
 
However, you are 100% wrong saying there is no virtue to making do w/less (which I don't see as a sacrifice anyway). If EVERYONE in the US got 2 MPG better we would be MUCH better off. I don't care what the Chinese do. If they want to purchase more, so be it. If we can cut down on our polution and our dependence on foreign oil not only are we better off, but more importantly our children are as well. I don't like being at the beckon call of dictators who hate us and want to end our way of life. All these people claiming "I can do what I want" won't be able to much longer if we continue to live so frivolously.
#6472 of 8564
Re: Those are a lot of straws to be grasping at. [snakeweasel] by robertsmx
Dec 07, 2007 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: snakeweasel (Dec 07, 2007 5:08 am)

You're comparing two different standards. I used one. That said, I could see an impact of 4-5 mpg in midsize/20-22 mpg class. Once we get into high mileage cars, practicality becomes far more important than saving 10% on fuel economy, especially if those savings are limiting (and restricted to largely urban driving).
#6473 of 8564
Re: Interesting Discussion! [dgecho1] by boaz47
Dec 07, 2007 (8:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: dgecho1 (Dec 07, 2007 5:48 am)

I think the whole subject is what is wrong with sub compacts. It would also seem as if that questions was aimed at the US consumer. The US consumer has shown preferences for larger vehicles than the Asians and Europeans so there must be a reason. we have more paved roads than they do. We average more miles than they do. We even tend to have larger houses than they do. Every country does what they feel is best for their country with little or no regard for other countries that is just how the world works. In African nations they drive even more diesels than they do in Europe. In fact most of the old Nissan and Toyota Diesel mini vans seem to have gone to Africa and Israel. On a hot day you can see and smell belching clouds of black smoke as each one drives passed using the lowest grade of diesel they can buy. Is there a condemnation for this practice? No because we aren't about judging how other cultures address these issues. Yet somehow we are expected to flog ourselves for the success of our nation and feel guilty for not having the same restrictions on transportation as some other have.
 
Sub Compacts have as much right on our roads as any other car, that has never been an issue or the question. We have just shown as a society a preference for something more comfortable or with more power and yes even something as large as a SUV. It does not make US consumers evil simply because we haven't embraced the plight of drivers in other countries. We had clean air standards when Europe was still burning peat as heating fuel up to about 15 years ago. No one assumed they were evil because they were spewing dirt into the air and didn't care about American air. we simply have a different lifestyle and SUV and quad cab trucks work for us better than they do for people in other countries. We have no reason to feel guilty for being successful as a nation and for taking advantage of that success.

Messages Page 648 of 857
1
...
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
...
857
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement