Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?
8691 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 1:39 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 06, 2007 9:51 am) Yes I agree 100% diesels now and far better economy and a real manual at least as an option. Did you see the Video on YouTube with a Smart with an engine from a Hayabusa in it. Now that was HP overload! Smart is about economy and it's not that far off from a Corolla or a Yaris and yeah it's cheaper but not by much. Also the Smart is awful in the snow! So snowbelt states it's as useful as a motorcycle even with snow tires! I'm looking for the link. http://www.canadiandriver.com/winter/traction2006.htm I'll repost the section from it just in case Begin Our smart fortwo had all the bells and whistles: traction control, stability control, ABS, and winter tires. But none of it helped much. The smart's rear wheel drive configuration (even though the engine is over the driven wheels) coupled with its super-short wheelbase made this vehicle a major challenge on the slippery surfaces used for our exercises. smart fortwo. Click image to enlarge Acceleration from a standstill or occasionally when moving was difficult. When cornering on icy surfaces, the smart wanted to rotate on its axis. Even when stopping the smart wanted to rotate, although it did stop, ah-hem, smartly. Although everybody wanted to drive the smart, the experience didn't meet expectations. END Smart has possibilities but the car needs some improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tiff_c (Dec 06, 2007 10:00 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: lilengineerboy (Dec 06, 2007 8:52 am) |
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 06, 2007 10:04 am) Well it sure does snow in some cites and those same people have to park their cars same as before. The Smart will fail unless they can sort out basic issues. I hope it succeeds but lots of congested cities get snow and those people who can't drive their one and only car in the snow will not buy a Smart. Maybe they need an AWD model? But it's a very fair thing to compare to unless you only sell in Florida and Kalifornia.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tiff_c (Dec 06, 2007 10:17 am)
|
|
|
Some dealer here in Boise is selling a last year's Smart imported by Zap with low, low miles on it for $27,995. Weird link that probably won't work long. I hope I'm not caught dead in my minivan - I'd rather die in my bed at home.  The Sprinters interest me from a conversion standpoint, but they are too big for home use. My Quest barely fits in my garage as it is.
|
|
|
Replying to: tiff_c (Dec 06, 2007 9:47 am) The real problem may be... is that too many?
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 06, 2007 11:34 am) 
|
|
|
Replying to: dromedarius (Dec 06, 2007 11:33 am) The real-world mileage is about 15-20% better, it's a quarter-ton lighter, and it's RWD. |
|
|
Replying to: robertsmx (Dec 06, 2007 11:49 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views What is "wrong" with these new subcompacts?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan Versa
2010 Toyota Yaris
2010 Honda Fit
2009 smart fortwo
2010 MINI Cooper
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
