Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles Saturn VUE Green Line Hybrid Saturn Vue Green Line Hybrid
75 messages, Last post on Feb 17, 2009 at 5:25 PM
You are in the Saturn VUE Green Line Hybrid Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 2:10 pm) MPGs were around the same. I was more agressive but doing more open road driving with the CTS. The 3.6 in a slightly modified form will be available in the Aura. I expect it will go on to become the V6 option for the next VUE. The hybrid, on the other hand, will have the 2.4 litre 4 used in the Solstice and Sky, an engine not available when you bought. |
|
|
Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 2:15 pm) We went over this earlier. According to GM, the electric engine in the Green line will provide acceleration boost and take over when one brakes to decelerate. The disadvantage to this type of system is that you notice the engine starting and stopping. I have read several reviews from people who have actually driven the Green Line. They say stop and start up is barely noticeable.
|
|
|
Replying to: logic1 (Apr 05, 2006 2:56 pm) Do you happen to have a NON GM source for this statement? I'm wondering if it was GM engineering or GM marketing that made this statement. RE: Acceleration boost. Since there are no electric motors connected to the transmission, I don't see how this is supposed to occur. Unless they are referring to the fact that the engine doesn't have to turn the alternator. At the moment my trust of GM is rather sparse, considering their current business situation. RE: Braking. This one makes sense, the system is connected to the engine via a belt, so it could provide some drag as it charges the battery.
|
|
|
Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 4:19 pm) Oh that makes a lot of sense, I should have a third party source for a vehicle not already on the market. I don't see how this is supposed to occur. Unless they are referring to the fact that the engine doesn't have to turn the alternator. So then you do have a hybrid Vue. At the moment my trust of GM is rather sparse, considering their current business situation. Another real sensible statement. GM has to pay a lot of retirement money so we cannot trust their product statements. By the way, I can read all words, whether bold, all caps or not. |
|
|
Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 4:19 pm) Oh that makes a lot of sense, I should have a third party source for a vehicle not already on the market. I don't see how this is supposed to occur. Unless they are referring to the fact that the engine doesn't have to turn the alternator. So then you do have a hybrid Vue. At the moment my trust of GM is rather sparse, considering their current business situation. Another real sensible statement. GM has to pay a lot of retirement money so we cannot trust their product statements. By the way, I can read all words, whether bold, all caps or not.
|
|
|
Replying to: logic1 (Apr 05, 2006 1:16 pm) Buy a Honda or Toyota and you get basically the same engine that's in a Lexus or Acura. If GM put their best technology in all their vehicles, their sales wouldn't be nose diving. I understand the issues GM has with legacy expense added on to the cost of each vehicle. That is a problem the government should have addressed with universal health care, etc. The consumer does not want to subsidize a manufacturer for poor management or government policies. They just want the best product. I don't see the Saturn GreenLine as a groundbreaking product. It's technology is at least 3 years behind the curve. If the GreenLine had the new 6 speed transmission, I'd consider buying one. We will see in a few months when the road tests and consumer reports come out, who's right about this. It looks like GM is on the right Track with the Saturn Outlook and Aura. They will have the 3.6 engine with a 6 speed transmission.
|
|
|
Replying to: ems1 (Apr 06, 2006 6:32 am) But GM is not promoting the VUE Greenline as ground breaking. It is promoting it as a hybrid option that will not add extensively to the base price of the product, but will nevertheless get gas mileage equal to best in its class. If the GreenLine had the new 6 speed transmission, I'd consider buying one. So what you are saying is the cost of the Greenline, and its mpgs compared to the competition mean nothing. But being able to say it has six speeds, well that is a world of joy. I went through this myself. When I bought my second (NB) Miata, I opted up for the six speed manual. It was a waste. I almost never used the sixth gear, I did not get better mileage than those who bought the base with the 5 speed, and it did not shift any better. If technology improves consumer experience, I am all for it. But unless you can show the lack of a six speed automatic is hindering the Greenline's stated purpose, I do not see the point of your objection. It looks like GM is on the right Track with the Saturn Outlook and Aura. They will have the 3.6 engine with a 6 speed transmission. And they will cost a lot more as well.
|
|
|
Replying to: logic1 (Apr 06, 2006 7:40 am) The jury is still out on whether the GreenLine will be cost effective. We will have to see what the real world mileage is. You have to drive most hybrids over 100,000 miles to, at least, break even. If the Vue has a payback at less than 50,000 miles, I guess that would be a success. I think most people want leading edge technology, whether it makes their life better or not. I guess that is just human nature. Would I rather have a 5 or 6 speed transmission over a 4 speed? YES. I don't want old technology in my cell phone, TV, car or even a refrigerator.
|
|
|
Replying to: ems1 (Apr 06, 2006 9:45 am) Assuming the new VUE is mechanically sound, I think the payback will be almost immediate. A base Escape comes in around 19k. The Hybrid Escape starts at 27k. The base Highlander is around 22k. The Hybrid Highlander starts at 33k. The base VUE, with the 2.2 litre and manual starts at 17k. The VUE greenline will have the 2.4 and automatic, and the electric boost starting at 23k. I guess if you want to consider the VUE with the V6 starts at around 21k, then you do need to put on some miles for the better mpgs to kick in. I think most people want leading edge technology, whether it makes their life better or not. I guess that is just human nature. Would I rather have a 5 or 6 speed transmission over a 4 speed? YES. I don't want old technology in my cell phone, TV, car or even a refrigerator. I agree to an extent. I travel a lot and use computers and the internet a lot. So I have a brand spanking new QWERTY device and an IMac intel at home. Personally, I am no chef. I could have bought a Viking stove when I remodeled my kitchen. But I went with a Maytag instead. I know a lot of people who just go with the free telephone with service contract, have a base Dell, but then splurge when they buy their oven. GM thinks there are people out there who want a high mileage cute ute, but do not want to pay an 8 to 10k penalty to get one. I would say the VUE greenline has my interest. On the other hand, I looked at the Escape and the Highlander hybrids long enough to see the price. I know if I bought the VUE I would not get something like Ford and Toyota are using. But I do not drive a lot anymore anyway. |
|
|
I know I wouldn't mind driving a Hybrid if the IRS rebates essentially paid for the engine, and the small fuel gains are still gains. The price is the main driving force here- the Escape Hybrid costs almost $30K but somewhere at NAIAS I read that the VUE Green Line was supposed to come in at $24K. I guess I would be willing to take the risk, maybe try it out and see how things work out. Maybe in a few years  (When that Civic finally kicks the bucket, which may be never)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles Saturn VUE Green Line Hybrid Saturn Vue Green Line Hybrid
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Saturn VUE
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
