Sign In Join 



Saturn Vue Green Line Hybrid

75 messages,  Last post on Feb 17, 2009 at 5:25 PM

You are in the Saturn VUE Green Line Hybrid Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Saturn VUE, Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 5 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#39 of 75
Re: 2007 Saturn Vue Greenline Hybrid [stevedebi] by scottnewvue
Apr 05, 2006 (1:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 11:53 am)

According to the folks that have tested the Hybrid VUE in real world conditions and averaging 31.9 mpg(!) this hybrid system is just a smaller version used in those larger trucks. The battery in those trucks are there to use mostly electricity but the VUE system is using a smaller version of that electric system (39 volt battery I think) to help save gas and only allow limited hybrid use. And according to those reviews that I read, the system is smooth and performance is only enhanced by the hybrid system, especially when an extra boost is needed to pass cars, etc. GM is placing this system in the Malibu soon after the VUE. I just don't believe that this is a 'nontested' system that the VUE is going to be a guinea pig for. GM is in enough trouble if this doesn't work out, I doubt they would play roullette with one of their best car line ups in years. Just my opinion.
#40 of 75
Re: Green Line - no way [stevedebi] by logic1
Apr 05, 2006 (1:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 11:50 am)

I went with the Honda CR-V. However, if Saturn had been using the Honda V6 (they started in 2004), I would have bought the Vue. But I didn't want a GM V6.
 
The VUE I drove the other day had the Honda V6. I found it noisy and underpowered compared to the GM V6 in the Cadillac CTS I rented about a month before.
#41 of 75
Re: Green Line - no way [logic1] by stevedebi
Apr 05, 2006 (2:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: logic1 (Apr 05, 2006 1:16 pm)

"I found it noisy and underpowered compared to the GM V6 in the Cadillac CTS I rented about a month before."
 
What kind of MPG did you get from that $38,000 CTS, as compared to the MPG from the $25,000 VUE?
 
I don't think these two vehicles can be compared.
#42 of 75
Re: 2007 Saturn Vue Greenline Hybrid [scottnewvue] by stevedebi
Apr 05, 2006 (2:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: scottnewvue (Apr 05, 2006 1:16 pm)

"The battery in those trucks are there to use mostly electricity but the VUE system is using a smaller version of that electric system (39 volt battery I think) to help save gas and only allow limited hybrid use."
 
Here is a partial repost of #16 of this forum. The bottom line is that this system does not provide propulsion at all. It does releive the engine from powering an alternator, which provides a small boost in torque.
 
It is my understanding that the GMC Sierra uses large batteries, not this system. I haven't heard of it's use before the Green Line Vue.
 
http://tinyurl.com/btnu2
  
"How Does It Work?
The BAS concept is to replace the belt driven alternator with an electric motor that serve as a generator and a motor. Thus when the engine is running the motor, and acting as a generator, the system will charge a separate 36 volt battery. When the engine needs to be started, the motor then applies its torque via the accessory belt, and cranks the engine instead of using the starter motor.
  
In this scheme, the motor/generator can be made larger than a standard starter motor so more torque can be generated when in the motoring mode. This allows for quicker starts of the engine, and makes the start/stop operation possible. Stopping the engine while vehicle is at idle is a means to conserve fuel. The disadvantage to this type of system is that you notice the engine starting and stopping. The control system for this technology so far has been somewhat crude in comparison to the full hybrid engine startups and for some people it could be annoying.
#43 of 75
Re: Green Line - no way [stevedebi] by logic1
Apr 05, 2006 (2:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 2:10 pm)

What kind of MPG did you get from that $38,000 CTS, as compared to the MPG from the $25,000 VUE?
 
MPGs were around the same. I was more agressive but doing more open road driving with the CTS.
 
The 3.6 in a slightly modified form will be available in the Aura. I expect it will go on to become the V6 option for the next VUE.
 
The hybrid, on the other hand, will have the 2.4 litre 4 used in the Solstice and Sky, an engine not available when you bought.
#44 of 75
Re: 2007 Saturn Vue Greenline Hybrid [stevedebi] by logic1
Apr 05, 2006 (2:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 2:15 pm)

Here is a partial repost of #16 of this forum. The bottom line is that this system does not provide propulsion at all. It does releive the engine from powering an alternator, which provides a small boost in torque.
 
We went over this earlier. According to GM, the electric engine in the Green line will provide acceleration boost and take over when one brakes to decelerate.
 
The disadvantage to this type of system is that you notice the engine starting and stopping.
 
I have read several reviews from people who have actually driven the Green Line. They say stop and start up is barely noticeable.
#45 of 75
Re: 2007 Saturn Vue Greenline Hybrid [logic1] by stevedebi
Apr 05, 2006 (4:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: logic1 (Apr 05, 2006 2:56 pm)

"We went over this earlier. According to GM, the electric engine in the Green line will provide acceleration boost and take over when one brakes to decelerate. "
 
Do you happen to have a NON GM source for this statement? I'm wondering if it was GM engineering or GM marketing that made this statement.
 
RE: Acceleration boost. Since there are no electric motors connected to the transmission, I don't see how this is supposed to occur. Unless they are referring to the fact that the engine doesn't have to turn the alternator. At the moment my trust of GM is rather sparse, considering their current business situation.
 
RE: Braking. This one makes sense, the system is connected to the engine via a belt, so it could provide some drag as it charges the battery.
#46 of 75
Re: 2007 Saturn Vue Greenline Hybrid [stevedebi] by logic1
Apr 05, 2006 (5:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 4:19 pm)

Do you happen to have a NON GM source for this statement? I'm wondering if it was GM engineering or GM marketing that made this statement.
 
Oh that makes a lot of sense, I should have a third party source for a vehicle not already on the market.
 
I don't see how this is supposed to occur. Unless they are referring to the fact that the engine doesn't have to turn the alternator.
 
So then you do have a hybrid Vue.
 
At the moment my trust of GM is rather sparse, considering their current business situation.
 
Another real sensible statement. GM has to pay a lot of retirement money so we cannot trust their product statements.
 
By the way, I can read all words, whether bold, all caps or not.
#47 of 75
Re: 2007 Saturn Vue Greenline Hybrid [stevedebi] by logic1
Apr 05, 2006 (5:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 05, 2006 4:19 pm)

Do you happen to have a NON GM source for this statement? I'm wondering if it was GM engineering or GM marketing that made this statement.
 
Oh that makes a lot of sense, I should have a third party source for a vehicle not already on the market.
 
I don't see how this is supposed to occur. Unless they are referring to the fact that the engine doesn't have to turn the alternator.
 
So then you do have a hybrid Vue.
 
At the moment my trust of GM is rather sparse, considering their current business situation.
 
Another real sensible statement. GM has to pay a lot of retirement money so we cannot trust their product statements.
 
By the way, I can read all words, whether bold, all caps or not.
#48 of 75
Re: Green Line - no way [logic1] by ems1
Apr 06, 2006 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: logic1 (Apr 05, 2006 1:16 pm)

The point you made about the Cadillac V6 illustrates the problem many people have with GM products. To get the good (smooth, quiet, powerful) engine you have to buy a Cadillac or a top of the line Buick.
Buy a Honda or Toyota and you get basically the same engine that's in a Lexus or Acura. If GM put their best technology in all their vehicles, their sales wouldn't be nose diving.
I understand the issues GM has with legacy expense added on to the cost of each vehicle. That is a problem the government should have addressed with universal health care, etc. The consumer does not want to subsidize a manufacturer for poor management or government policies. They just want the best product.
 
I don't see the Saturn GreenLine as a groundbreaking product. It's technology is at least 3 years behind the curve. If the GreenLine had the new 6 speed transmission, I'd consider buying one.
We will see in a few months when the road tests and consumer reports come out, who's right about this.
 
It looks like GM is on the right Track with the Saturn Outlook and Aura. They will have the 3.6 engine with a 6 speed transmission.

Messages Page 5 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement