- #169 of 231
-
Re: UPDATE..... [dispencer2]
by paisan
-
Apr 18, 2007 (4:40 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: dispencer2 (Apr 18, 2007 4:35 am)
Karl,
Yeah I'm definitely thinking that the sticker on this car will be over $30k, probably around $32k->40k. Maybe a 6 cylinder will eak in at $28k. Then you figure with the usual rebates etc looking at street prices 25k->35k for most, with a full blown one well over 40k and closer to 50k for a "special" one. Like the SRT8 Charger full bore is selling for $45k-47k!
-mike
|
- #170 of 231
-
MSRPs
by rayainsw
-
Apr 18, 2007 (6:36 am)
-
|
The most current ** GUESSES ** regarding G8 pricing ( including quotes from Mr. Lutz ) strongly suggest the V6 version to start at $25K-ish and the V8 version to start at $30K\$32K-ish.
If true, I’d expect the Camaro to be at least a couple of grand less, at each engine level, to start. $23K for a V6 & $28-30K for a V8.
I think that if they price it any higher, they will not be competitive. Because the Mustang V6 and GT V8 will ( still ) be priced substantially lower.
If you look at a Camaro as a shorter G8, with a smaller back seat & no rear doors ( way oversimplified, but I suspect many people will perceive it thus ) it would likely be perceived as ‘worth less’ – regardless of the exterior styling.
Just my $2K worth . . .
- Ray
Ready for my test drive . . .
|
- #171 of 231
-
Re: MSRPs [rayainsw]
by paisan
-
Apr 18, 2007 (6:40 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: rayainsw (Apr 18, 2007 6:36 am)
Hmm it would be nice to price it below the price of the GTO but wasn't the MSRP on those $32-33k???
-mike
|
- #172 of 231
-
Re: UPDATE..... [paisan]
by casull
-
Apr 18, 2007 (6:47 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: paisan (Apr 17, 2007 4:50 pm)
"I wouldn't count on it. This car will likely be expensive, and fall somewhere just south of the vette."
That is interesting becasue it directly contradicts any and all information given by GM or the Camaro community in genral.
It has been stated and confirmed that the Camaro will be priced within a few hundred of the Mustang. I hardly call that Corvette territory. GM is looking to sell 100k units a year, and I think they know that if it is priced too high that they will not come anywhere near that target. I would expect the top of the line 550 HP version to be in the vette territory, but come on now... why wouldn't it be?
Even if you account for inflation, a 2002 Z28 still comes in below $30k in 2009 dollars. There is no way a base V8 is going to be anywhere near $35k......
|
- #173 of 231
-
Re: MSRPs [paisan]
by casull
-
Apr 18, 2007 (6:49 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: paisan (Apr 18, 2007 6:40 am)
The GTO did not enjoy the economies of scale that the Camaro will have to help lower the price. Not to mention, I would have to think that GM learned their lesson with the GTOs pricing.
|
- #174 of 231
-
Re: MSRPs [casull]
by paisan
-
Apr 18, 2007 (7:03 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: casull (Apr 18, 2007 6:49 am)
Let's hope so. I'm no mustang fan and would love nothing more than to see the Camaro do well. Just trying to be realistic on how GM has been pricing their cars lately, which has been higher than expected for what you get (CTS, GTO, etc)
-mike
|
- #175 of 231
-
Re: MSRPs [casull]
by rayainsw
-
Apr 18, 2007 (8:08 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: casull (Apr 18, 2007 6:49 am)
"Not to mention, I would have to think that GM learned their lesson with the GTOs pricing. "
Lutz has said exactly that...
- Ray
Waiting ( oh, so very ) patiently...
|
- #176 of 231
-
Re: MSRPs [paisan]
by dispencer2
-
Apr 18, 2007 (4:11 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: paisan (Apr 18, 2007 7:03 am)
I would think that GM would put out some word on pricing. I agree that if it is slated to sell 100k units they will have to compete with the Mustang price-wise. I still think that there will be a price leader -something that can be equipped to LOOK like a sports car but still will have a V6, soft ride suspension, and probably a 4 speed automatic. The sales gimmick will be that it is still a Camaro. You can buy a V6 Mustang or get a Cobra. They are still Mustangs and look similar. GM will have a long way to go to beat the Mustang heritage and image. The Mustang Club of America covers ALL Mustangs right up to the newest ones. It didn't use to in the '80's when I had an '83 convertible. The club was only interested in the "classic" models (1964.5 up to 1973). There are Camaro clubs around but nothing like MCA. Don't get me wrong. I am looking forward to buying a Camaro -I've had two Mustangs and sold both of them - but GM needs to appeal to the masses if they expect to sell cars.
|
- #177 of 231
-
Re: MSRPs [dispencer2]
by nosirrahg
-
Apr 18, 2007 (7:21 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: dispencer2 (Apr 18, 2007 4:11 pm)
One comment on the appeal of the Camaro...I think the Mustang does a really good job of appealing to both sexes, but from what I've seen the Camaro seems very male skewed. Not that that's a bad thing necessarily, but as you said, you can buy a V6 Mustang (the "secretary's car" back in the day) or a Cobra, but they're all Mustangs and there's a common bond there. I see the Camaro skewing more to the Cobra end of the spectrum in that regard.
|
- #178 of 231
-
Re: MSRPs [nosirrahg]
by dispencer2
-
Apr 19, 2007 (11:49 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: nosirrahg (Apr 18, 2007 7:21 pm)
I'm sure they don't sell 100,000 Covettes or Cobras in any given year so if the Camaro is to reach those sales figures they will have to price it in the mid to high 20's for a base model and then appeal to the performance buffs by putting out 35-40k models with V8's etc. They may go with the LS,LT,SS designations with variances in between. The Camaro and Firebird were always male cars. I guess the old Daytona was too. I bought my high school daughter a new '89 red Daytona Turbo and she said that it was a guy's car so all the guys were jealous of her. She got more dates when she had the '83 Mustang.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Future Vehicles 
