Sign In Join 



Lincoln MKS

2770 messages,  Last post on Nov 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM

You are in the Lincoln MKS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lincoln MKS, Sedan


Messages Page 268 of 278
1
...
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
...
278
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2667 of 2770
Re: Lincoln MKS vs. Cadillac CTS [dmitrib] by datagen
Jul 17, 2009 (3:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: dmitrib (Jul 16, 2009 6:09 pm)

Brucelinc is correct. You can have a vehicle to test overnight, even weekend. I did it with my Zephyr, MKS, and MKZ. They will even deliver the car to your home once it arrives and is prep for you. He is also right about your own needs. If I recall correctly brucelinc was waiting for the ecoboost engine which I will be able to give you a direct report on at the end of the month. I will be test driving the new Taurus with the ecoboost and several other vehicles. So I plan on taking notes and letting all who are interested what I experienced. Brucelinc also hit on another point in the room area. If you plan on doing long distance traveling (300-800 miles), you may consider the MKS, City stuff the CTS can handle well. If you are looking at a sportier ride, then the CTS is your baby, but you may want to check out the New MKZ. It is very responsive and I suspect I should have a couple of speeding tickets by the end of August.
#2668 of 2770
Re: Lincoln MKS vs. Cadillac CTS [dmitrib] by brucelinc
Jul 17, 2009 (4:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: dmitrib (Jul 16, 2009 6:09 pm)

Sorry to hear about the accident with your Continental. If you liked that car, my guess is that you would find the MKS would be an awesome replacement. Yes, as Datagen says, if you are a serious shopper, a good dealer will arrange for you to spend some quality time with a car that you are considering. I had an MKS overnight and was offered a weekend with it. I gathered all the information I needed by having it overnight and driving it on my regular commute to work.
 
The base MKS comes with 18" Goodyear Comfortred tires. They are very quiet and ride nicely but the MKS is much firmer than the old Continental - much better handling with more control. The Ultimate Package includes 19" Goodyear RSA tires. It is a bit firmer than the base car with the 18" tires and I found them to generate a bit more road noise. Optional are 20" Michelins. They look awesome but are a bit firmer than the 18s or 19s. Depending on how sensitive you are to ride/quiet, you might want to try different MKSs with the various tire/wheel combinations. All are very good - not harsh at all - but there are subtle differences.
 
Datagen, I can't wait to hear your thoughts on the Ecoboost and the Taurus. I expect to be behind the wheel of one in the next couple of weeks myself. We can compare notes.
#2669 of 2770
Re: Lincoln MKS vs. Cadillac CTS [brucelinc] by dmitrib
Jul 17, 2009 (6:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Jul 17, 2009 4:57 am)

what is ecoboost ?
#2670 of 2770
2010 MKS enhancements by brucelinc
Jul 18, 2009 (4:54 am)
Reply
Media Ford has some new information about suspension and structural enhancements for the 2010 MKS. Below is an excerpt from the site. Kudos to Ford for taking a 1 year old model and upgrading it already. While the 2009 was smooth and quiet, the 2010 should be even better and more competitive with the prestige nameplates.
 
For 2010, Lincoln MKS was been treated to a ground-up review of its structure in an effort to improve upon its already ouststanding noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) characteristics. Additional bracing and strategically placed sound-deadening materials have produced a new level of cabin isolation, providing MKS drivers with a sense of sanctuary.
 
The structural enhancements have been supplemented by suspension improvements designed to further improve NVH while also enhancing the driving experience when pushed hard. Mounts and bushings have been extensively revised, and spring/shock tuning and front suspension geometry has been reworked to give drivers exceptional handling capabilities in a full-size luxury vehicle.
 
In addition to the refinements found throughout the MKS line, EcoBoost models take the tuning one step further. Larger stabilizer bars front and rear provide flatter cornering characteristics, and an entirely new front subframe aids in further adjustments to the suspension geometry. Combined with dual roll restrictors, the EcoBoost MKS is equipped with handling dynamics perfectly matched to its powerful, responsive engine – without sacrificing the luxurious ride Lincoln owners demand.
#2671 of 2770
Re: Lincoln MKS vs. Cadillac CTS [dmitrib] by brucelinc
Jul 18, 2009 (5:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: dmitrib (Jul 17, 2009 6:32 pm)

Ecoboost is Ford's name for their engines that feature direct injection and turbocharging. So far, the only ecoboost engine is the 3.5 V6 and will be available in the MKS, Taurus SHO, Flex, and MKT. Later, there will be 4 cylinder versions.
 
The benefit is more power from a smaller engine. The idea is that smaller engines use less fuel but the direct injection and turbos give them the power of larger engines. From my gearhead perspective, the big benefit is massive torque at very low RPM. That allows the use of more economical gearing. The MKS ecoboost is rated 2 MPG better highway mileage than the non-ecoboost AWD MKS but it has 85 more HP and runs like a scalded ape.
#2672 of 2770
Re: Lincoln MKS vs. Cadillac CTS [brucelinc] by dmitrib
Jul 18, 2009 (4:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Jul 18, 2009 5:03 am)

cadillac CTS 2009 also has direct injection model , is it the same?
#2673 of 2770
Re: Lincoln MKS vs. Cadillac CTS [dmitrib] by lilengineerboy
Jul 18, 2009 (6:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dmitrib (Jul 18, 2009 4:33 pm)

cadillac CTS 2009 also has direct injection model , is it the same?
 
I know you realize this already, but just to be sure we are all on the same thoughts, Cadillac is a GM car, and the MKS is a Lincoln (which is part of Ford) so on that level, no, they are not at all the same.
 
If you mean is the GM direct injection engine as good as the Lincoln direct injection engine, then its worth noting that the MKS with EcoBoost uses turbo-charging as well. Using relatively small, efficient turbos gets rid of the lag people associate with the 70s and 80s turbo cars. In a straight line and on the highway, its a hoot to drive. The 3.6 liter normally aspirated (no turbo) in the CTS isn't as powerful, but the car is still very engaging to drive.
 
I think Brucelinc was pretty spot on that if you enjoyed the Town Car, the MKS in a standard trim level would be a great match, but if you wanted something more sporty, I would look at the EcoBoost MKS and the CTS. Either way, you will probably want to drive them both, there are subtle differences that might affect the day-to-day life.
 
I really like the navigation system in the MKS. I also really like the connectivity through SYNC for a cell phone and iPod. The iPod/phone interface in the Cadillac is a lot clunkier. I also don't like the temperature readout for the climate control for the Caddy is at my knee level.
#2674 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS enhancements [brucelinc] by akirby
Jul 19, 2009 (8:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Jul 18, 2009 4:54 am)

Pretty sure all those improvements were done to handle the extra torque from the ecoboost engine.
#2675 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS enhancements [akirby] by brucelinc
Jul 19, 2009 (11:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jul 19, 2009 8:59 am)

True, but a great side effect is the even quieter ride. All the press that have reviewed the car use terms like "quiet as a tomb," quiet as a coffin," or "truly serene." Ford has apparently done a good job with the Fusion, Milan, and MKZ in the area of getting rid of unwanted noise, too. That seems to be an area of focus throughout the line up and I am glad to see it.
#2676 of 2770
Re: Lincoln MKS vs. Cadillac CTS [lilengineerboy] by datagen
Jul 19, 2009 (2:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lilengineerboy (Jul 18, 2009 6:28 pm)

Your are right lilengineerboy that there are different cars. That is why I believe the Ecoboost with the more sporty suspension is to compete with the CTS and others in that area. I have to wonder sometimes is all this counter productive to the real requirements that we all may be missing here. I understand that the automakers attune to the customers wants, but are our wants wrong as far as we as a nation is concern?
 
I say this because even though there are beginnings to be a move towards more fuel-efficient vehicles, one thing that may be given up towards this quest is the speed and power that we all may be use too. I wonder is that such a sacrifice where with all that power and speed when there is no place to really use it legally. So in a sense it is like buying a 4-wheel drive vehicle and don’t 4-wheel drive.
 
I understand that many want to feel the power even if it is a short amount of time, but I wonder is it worth the price for such few seconds or hundreds of a second’s difference between the advancement being introduced and what is currently on the streets. Many have asked the question is all this power and the need for speed really needed? I would say no it is not needed, but it is wanted for even I will admit the sensation feels good (have enough tickets to attest to that) . Hopefully with the advancement of the electric engine (where acceleration and power is more efficient), we can have what we want, keep contributing towards the policeman's ball, and help the environment as well.

Messages Page 268 of 278
1
...
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
...
278
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement