Sign In Join 



Lincoln MKS

2770 messages,  Last post on Nov 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM

You are in the Lincoln MKS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lincoln MKS, Sedan


Messages Page 266 of 277
1
...
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
...
277
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2651 of 2770
Re: Ecoboost suspension tuning [hayjule] by datagen
Jul 06, 2009 (10:42 am)
Reply

Good luck on that one. Would your LS make the clunker's list?
#2653 of 2770
Update by datagen
Jul 06, 2009 (11:33 am)
Reply
Ok Everyone, I have hit the 10,000 mile marker and it is time for an update. It seems pretty broken in now. The ride is smothering, but I suspect it is not as smooth as those with the 19 and 18 inch rims. The engine seems quieter and the punch distance (gas pedal to floor distance) seems about the same. One thing I have noticed is that when I do punch it, the engine revs up and the whole car moves together, not the front end hauling ass like the engine wants to leave the body and the backend praying that it can keep up.
 
I do not have the blind spot indicators and sometimes I thought I could use them with the high shoulders and all. Due to this body style I have become a more cautious driver (safer, well that may be another story). My garage and driveway is a little tight so backing up in it sets all the sensors off so much that you think the car was going into cardiac arrest.
 
I just got my wife the new 2010 MKZ loaded. It may keep me off the couch a couple of month. It seems a little shorter and lighter than my Zephyr. That 3.5 does not play on this body. The stabilizers strain to keep an even keel when you gun this fella. Don't need an Ecoboost here. You will get enough tickets with the 3.5 alone. We took it down to Ohio for the holidays (wrong answer). The PoPo was everywhere and it was a strain keeping those horses under control.
 
The MKS would have been much better suited for that trip. The one big thing I did notice between the two is the nav system. You can see there have been some upgrades and the way it looks right now, I do not see those types of upgrades being available for previous models with the nav package. One feature on the MKZ is there is a keypad on the screen where you can punch your radio station numbers in. This is good because it cuts down the distance you take your eyes away from traffic. On the MKS, you have to look lower on the mid console. Who knows, I may be able to suggest the upgrade as a safety feature. You think they would buy that?
#2655 of 2770
Re: Ecoboost suspension tuning [hayjule] by brucelinc
Jul 07, 2009 (4:25 am)
Reply

Where the heck have you been?? Good to hear from you!
 
I have an offer of $6000 for my 10 year old LS with 112,000 miles on it. The offer is from a co-worker who knows how fussy I am with cars. My LS looks like it just came out of the showroom. Frankly, I feel a little guilty about selling it for that much, though - particularly to someone I see everyday! The guy wants it for his 18 year old daughter who only cares about the sound system and the moonroof.
#2657 of 2770
Re: Ecoboost suspension tuning [hayjule] by brucelinc
Jul 07, 2009 (6:44 pm)
Reply

Well, I have missed you. I needed a good natured troublemaker like you to talk me out of buying a slightly glorified Taurus and paying $15,000 more than it is worth!
 
You are right about needing the no b*tch contract. I already told him that I guarantee NOTHING and that the early models like mine had a few issues. His silly daughter just fell in love with it, though. The first time it snows, she will probably wreck it, anyway.
#2658 of 2770
Re: Update [datagen] by brucelinc
Jul 10, 2009 (4:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: datagen (Jul 06, 2009 11:33 am)

Datagen, congratulations for owning both an MKS and an MKZ. Have you ordered an MKT, yet?
 
The 2010 MKZ is a pretty nice car. How would you compare it with your MKS in terms of ride, quietness, and overall refinement? Is your Z FWD or AWD?
#2659 of 2770
Re: Update [brucelinc] by datagen
Jul 10, 2009 (5:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Jul 10, 2009 4:36 am)

My Z is AWD and it is much more responsive than the MKS. I had the Zephyr for a while and was able to compare the Z with it. I notice a more responsiveness even compared to its predecessor. The electronic toys are nice, but what really stunned me was the style of the interior. Just when I though my Zephyr had a beautiful interior, this new Z leaves it in the dust. The ambient lighting adds a nice touch to it as well. It seemed to me they took the 1950’s and made it look new again. Since it is a lighter vehicle than the MKS, it responsiveness is understandable. Even though it has the THX certified sound system as well, The MKS seems to blow by it with the extra speakers (tweeters) front and rear. The Z give me a more sports car feel where the MKS provides a more luxury ride. For some reason, I am not in tuned with the MKT yet.
#2660 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [esfoad] by wwest
Jul 11, 2009 (8:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: esfoad (May 28, 2009 12:31 pm)

"..penchant for kicking those that are down...."
 
No.
 
If anything we have a "penchant" for "rooting" for the underdog.

Messages Page 266 of 277
1
...
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
...
277
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement