You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Lincoln MKS
Lincoln MKS

2769 messages, Last post on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:08 PM
You are in the Lincoln MKS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
I think the car is already noticeable, particularly the front end. From the rear it would be more noticeable if they can fix the taillights and give it more of the horizontal “Lincoln look”. Hopefully a style refresh will do that. OTH, I also think Gregg is right in that the car does look smaller than it is. There’s something about the rear quarter view / C pillar treatment that just makes the car look stubby. The Lexus G series has the same thing going for it.
|
|
|
Replying to: displacedtexan (Jun 16, 2009 11:36 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: datagen (Jun 16, 2009 5:09 pm) I agree the front is pretty striking. Overall, I think the car looks pretty upscale and somewhat distinctive - just not strikingly attractive! I have been driving an LS for 10 years. I got the first one my dealer sold in May, 1999. Anyone who noticed it (and few did) thought it was a Mitsubishi. I think the MKS makes a much stronger statement than the LS did. By the way, Lincoln has updated their website with more information on the 2010 MKS and the "build and price" section is functional. |
|
|
My dealer emailed me the VIN of the car I ordered and I was able to pull up a PDF of the window sticker. There is a date on it of June 10. I don't know if that was the build date of the car or if it was just the date the VIN was issued. Does anyone know if the Chicago plant has even started building 2010s yet? By the way, the window sticker shows EPA ratings of 17/25 so the ecoboost picked up 2 MPG over the 3.7 base AWD model. Time will tell if real world FE is better. With the 2.77 gearing, I would expect good highway mileage at cruise. |
|
|
Just got back from the dealer for a service to include an oil change. On checking the oil level this weekend, I noticed it appears to be a bit overfilled. My question is, how careful does one have to be about this? Will it hurt anything? Should I stop driving the car until it is taken care of? I certainly don't want to do long term damage to the engine. What sort of damage could this cause? Now when I say overfilled, it is a bit difficult to tell exactly where the top of the oil is on the dipstick. However, the top hole (at the full mark on the dipstick) is definitely not empty. The oil definitely goes over this hole for at least 2 or 3 mm. It is just hard to say how much further up it goes since the oil is so new. I am checking on level ground first thing in the morning, before using the car for the day. I am removing the dipstick, wiping it before reinserting, then removing it for the read. Thanks for any thoughts. |
|
|
Replying to: drew70301 (Jun 28, 2009 4:08 pm) This happened to a friend of mine with his Taurus. It calls for 5.5 quarts and they put in 6. They drained some out and all is well. No more Jiffy-lube for him, though.
|
|
|
Replying to: brucelinc (Jun 29, 2009 4:34 am) |
|
|
Replying to: drew70301 (Jun 28, 2009 4:08 pm) The manager told me that it was a full quart overfilled. He told me that they had a problem with the bulk supply and that they had to break out the individual quarts. They made a mistake. I don't know if his determination of a full quart too much was from a measurement or from an estimate. So, after 4 days and about 200 miles of driving with a quart too much oil, should I worry about damage down the road? I notice the service today is not listed on the owners website service history. I suppose I should ask them to make sure it is logged properly in the service history. I have had a total of 4 oil changes at a dealer over the last 20 years and there has been a problem with each of them. I have not had good luck. 1. Once in the early 1990's, I noticed on the receipt that 10W40 oil was used, I asked why since that is not what the owner's manual called for. The answer was that they used 10W40 because it was hot in this part of the country. 2. In the late 1990's, I had a sable with the bigger engine option. On the receipt printout, I noticed that the volume of oil used was not correct for my engine. No big deal, I added more at home. I pointed it out to them but they didn't believe me. I didn't have the printout anymore since it was a few months down the road. 3. With my towncar in the mid 2000's, they cross treaded the oil pan plug. Of course, this was noticed at my next oil change at my regular place. I was standing right there chatting with him inspecting the underside of the car when I saw he was having trouble removing the plug. Of course, he had a suitable replacement in his drawer. 4. current oil overfill issue and they sure didn't believe me until they saw it for themselves. Sort of unbelievable. Lots of points for this salesman. I have bought 3 cars from him already.
|
|
|
Replying to: drew70301 (Jul 01, 2009 7:21 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Lincoln MKS
Lincoln MKS
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Lincoln MKS



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats