Sign In Join 



Lincoln MKS

2770 messages,  Last post on Nov 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM

You are in the Lincoln MKS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lincoln MKS, Sedan


Messages Page 260 of 278
1
...
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
...
278
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2588 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [lilengineerboy] by izaclown1
May 21, 2009 (5:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: lilengineerboy (May 20, 2009 7:25 pm)

It was like driving a couch. Very comfy seats, but it did not really perform until you were on interstate out of town traffic. Was not a comfy ride at all. I have ridden in old pickups that road better. Too stiff in the suspension and you felt every single road surface imperfections. 2 sets of very high priced tires front and back and you did not rotate them. They were only 35kmile or so rated as well. Would not run with anything less than 96 octane.
 
I looked at one, but the maintenance and gas was out my my price range at the time. Blue Oval bombed on that one.
#2589 of 2770
Re: interesting discussion going on here... [speculator] by akirby
May 21, 2009 (6:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: speculator (May 20, 2009 9:21 pm)

My point is is that he price of the car is in the segment that the average Ford buyer isn't interested in. What would the average Ford customer think when he sees the price of this car. He might believe that for 38k he could buy a Mercedes or Bimmer or an MKS
 
And my point (which you are completely ignoring) is that Ford has never tried to sell a Taurus like this, so you can't really say whether the buying public will pay this much for the 2010 Taurus or not. Ford's reputation is totally different than even 2 years ago. Ford's products are totally different now. Regardless of your "soda bottle" comments the Taurus interior is head and shoulders above any previous versions.
 
Why do you insist on comparing a $38K Taurus to a $38K BMW or MB? You're comparing a nicely loaded 350 HP full sized sedan to a bare bones stripper compact car with 100 less hp (at least).
 
Someone who wants a full sized sedan won't be looking at a 325i to begin with.
 
The best comparisons would be a Dodge Charger R/T or Chrysler 300C Hemi and to me the Taurus is a much better car and I would certainly pay the price difference for the SHO over those cars.
 
As for folks not paying $38K for a Ford - you must not have priced a loaded F150 or Expedition. They already exceed $50K.
#2590 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [speculator] by nvbanker
May 21, 2009 (8:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: speculator (May 20, 2009 7:48 pm)

Also the SHO uses recycled plastic soda bottles for the for its interior. Even for its seats.
 
Ok now, I just don't see this at all!!! Those days are over, and Ford has a class leading interior these days, as someone said, better than any Lincoln had prior to the MKS. You obviously don't like Ford period.
#2591 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [izaclown1] by nvbanker
May 21, 2009 (8:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: izaclown1 (May 21, 2009 5:10 am)

It was like driving a couch. Very comfy seats, but it did not really perform until you were on interstate out of town traffic. Was not a comfy ride at all. I have ridden in old pickups that road better. Too stiff in the suspension and you felt every single road surface imperfections. 2 sets of very high priced tires front and back and you did not rotate them. They were only 35kmile or so rated as well. Would not run with anything less than 96 octane.
  
I looked at one, but the maintenance and gas was out my my price range at the time. Blue Oval bombed on that one.

 
I disagree. My test drive of an MKS proved comfortable, quieter than my Lexus LS430, lackluster power but adequate, the tires should be quality and I don't know where you're getting your octane figures, it runs fine on regular, a selling point for the car. Your opinion is entitled, but it lacks credibility to me.
#2592 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [nvbanker] by akirby
May 21, 2009 (10:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (May 21, 2009 8:30 am)

He wasn't talking about the MKS - he was either talking about the old Taurus SHO or the Marauder - hard to tell since he didn't quote anything.
#2593 of 2770
C & D review by brucelinc
May 21, 2009 (10:30 am)
Reply
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/hot_lists/car_shopping/luxury_sedans/2010_li- ncoln_mks_with_ecoboost_first_drive_review
 
Another positive review of the twin-turbo MKS. They are estimating 0-60 in 5.5 and the quarter mile in 13.9. What a torque monster that ecoboost is! They also discuss the revised suspension tuning and additional sound deadening in the 2010 models - called it borderline playful when driven in anger and "truly serene even at triple digit speeds."
 
I will draw my own conclusions when mine arrives but after years and years, it appears Lincoln has built a car just for me.
#2594 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [nvbanker] by emrnibbles1
May 21, 2009 (12:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (May 21, 2009 8:12 am)

But that is the problem with Ford and Lincoln. The suede seats in the Taurus uses recycled plastic to produce the threads that produce the suede. It's not really suede it's really artificial suede. Ford could name it what ever it wants to but it doesn't change what the material is made of. The MKS has to depend on using scrap wood to produce its interior wooden trim. Ford admits that it uses cast-offs from furniture manufacturers for its wooden trim. Not good for a premium car. It's like pinching penneys as is the norm with Ford. If Ford couldn't use srap wood would it still offer wood as an option.
#2595 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [emrnibbles1] by akirby
May 21, 2009 (1:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: emrnibbles1 (May 21, 2009 12:07 pm)

It's not pinching pennies - it's called being environmentally responsible and in case you hadn't noticed - that's a big deal nowadays.
 
I can't believe you're turning a positive into such a negative.
#2596 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [akirby] by brucelinc
May 21, 2009 (1:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (May 21, 2009 1:18 pm)

I am not a tree-hugger but I do believe in being responsible. Ford should be extremely proud of what they are doing. Their efforts are a huge positive in my book. From Media Ford:
 
Ford’s award-winning soy-based foam seat cushions and backs, for example, will be on more than 1 million Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles by the end of this year, leading to a total reduction in carbon dioxide emissions of more than 5 million pounds. Most recently, Ford announced that the all-new 2010 Ford Taurus SHO, Ford Fusion and Lincoln MKZ will feature sustainable interior materials such as seat fabrics made with varying degrees of post-industrial yarns, suede-like material created from plastic pop bottles, chromium-free leather and engineered ebony wood, all of which reduce waste, energy consumption and CO2 emissions.
 
To ensure these greener material measures resonate with customers, Ford designers are gaining a deeper understanding of the different levels of green consumerism. Statistics show that one in four adults in the U.S. are living more sustainable lifestyles; interested in companies that are more socially responsible and buying products that are healthier for people and the planet.
#2597 of 2770
Re: 2010 MKS Ecoboost pricing [gregg_vw] by explorerx4
May 21, 2009 (4:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (May 20, 2009 11:24 am)

as a prior owner of gen 1, 2, and 3 of the SHO, your comments are not based in fact. you are welcome to have an opinion, just don't post like you have some real konwledge.

Messages Page 260 of 278
1
...
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
...
278
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement