Sign In Join 



Buying American Cars What Does It Mean?

7263 messages,  Last post on May 27, 2009 at 4:31 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Buying

With parts coming from everywhere, does "Buying American" have much meaning anymore? Is quality and price the bottom line?


Messages Page 647 of 727
1
...
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
...
727
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6454 of 7263
Re: If GM gets rid of Buick... [imidazol97] by tlong
Oct 23, 2008 (9:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Oct 23, 2008 4:52 pm)

Just what percent of the dollar value of Honda vehicles sold here do they build here?
Same question for Toyota. How much is sold here that actually is imported rather than assembled here.

 
Here are some numbers I found on the internet, data from 2008:
 
Vehicle - Percent N.A. content (or where built outside US)
 
Impala - Canada
300 - Canada
HHR - Mexico
PT Cruiser - Mexico
Fusion - Mexico
Equinox - 55%
G6 - 85%
Cobalt >75%
Malibu >75%
Edge - 70%
 
Mustang - 65%
Escape - 65%
 
Accord - 60%
Odyssey - 75%
CRV - 10%
Civic - 70%
 
Prius - Japan
Corolla - 50%
Sienna - 85%
Camry >75%
 
However, some articles say the formula is flawed and favors domestic makes. For example, "If a supplier produces a car battery in the United States that is made of 70 percent domestic content, when that battery is installed in a U.S.-built, domestic-brand vehicle, it is considered 100-percent domestic content, says AIAM spokesperson Kim Custer. But if that exact battery is installed in a U.S.-built import-brand vehicle, it is considered only 70-percent domestic content."
#6455 of 7263
Re: If GM gets rid of Buick... [imidazol97] by imidazol97
Oct 24, 2008 (3:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Oct 23, 2008 4:52 pm)

Someone has posted before the percents of total vehicles for HoToy that were assembled in this country. If I remember the one that I would think built the most here was lower than the other as far as the total number being imported still.
 
The advertising leads people to believe a much higher percent of total output for each brand is built here than actually is. Building here is good.
#6456 of 7263
Re: american car companies' lousy performance [sidious6688] by lemko
Oct 24, 2008 (5:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: sidious6688 (Oct 23, 2008 4:20 pm)

My experience is the polar opposite of yours. I've had excellent experience with American cars - especially Buick and Cadillac. Why should I abandon them for the unknown (Japanese) especially when I find the Asian offerings bland, soulless, grotesque, or simply alien?
#6457 of 7263
Re: If GM gets rid of Buick... [cooterbfd] by captain2
Oct 24, 2008 (5:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Oct 23, 2008 2:26 pm)

the Big 3, who are downsizing to the equivalent of their market share, yet still employ SEVERAL TIMES more people in this country than than the foreign companies,
you know this may all be true, it may indeed take 10 UAW employees to do what one employee can do in Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, and Alabama (to name a few) - a really sad commentary on an industry that the US (and the so called Big 3) dominated not that many years ago. Sure all those ludricrous pensions and free healthcare that the US makers count - for whatever portion of the overall economic pie that really is BUT when GM, for example, is spending $2500.00 PER CAR to fund these programs and that also happens to be about what they lose on every car they sell - there is something definitely wrong with this picture.
Ford, closes dozens of plants in recent years, buys out the contracts of many of those employed at these plants, so they too can reap the rewards of these negotiated pension programs AFTER they spend their unemployment checks that you and I both funded. And after they do all that to us, then they seek some justification for injecting so more pesos down south of the border? Gimme a break.
Ford is a Mexican car manufacturer, Buick will shortly be a Chinese one and then, they expect me to spend my hard earned $ on generally inferior products, watch that money disappear into other economies - and all because the brand names don't happen to end in a vowel??? Thanks anyway, I think I know a way to get some real value for my money and most importantly put more of that money back into the pockets of genuine Americans - where it belongs.
#6458 of 7263
Re: If GM gets rid of Buick... [imidazol97] by lemko
Oct 24, 2008 (5:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Oct 24, 2008 3:04 am)

Heck, if they want to sell 'em here they should BUILD 'EM HERE! That goes for the Domestics as well. I'll believe Toyota really cares about America when they build a huge car plant in North Philly.
#6459 of 7263
Re: If GM gets rid of Buick... [tlong] by circlew
Oct 24, 2008 (10:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Oct 23, 2008 4:44 pm)

That's because the American makers are far less efficient with labor (and THAT is largely due to the union). What company can long endure while not trying to be efficient when its competitors are doing better? Do you really believe that maintaining inefficiencies is the path to prosperity for this country?
 
Well said...and you can't buy your way into prosperity on credit. Things balance out. The big 3 or undergoing the re-balancing that is a long time coming.
 
Regards,
OW
#6460 of 7263
Re: If GM gets rid of Buick... [tlong] by circlew
Oct 24, 2008 (10:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Oct 23, 2008 9:28 pm)

However, some articles say the formula is flawed and favors domestic makes.
 
Sounds like the formula is as complex as the risk aversion on CDS's!
 
Regards,
OW
#6461 of 7263
Re: american car companies' lousy performance [lemko] by fezo
Oct 24, 2008 (10:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Oct 24, 2008 5:51 am)

I've said it before and I'll say it again - with the kind of experience you've had with American cars you'd be nuts to buy anything else. Of course it doesn't hurt that your tastes run exactly where American cars excel.
 
Last Caddy i drove was my dad's last DeVille. Probably a 2001. I actually enjoyed that one. Had that one ended up as dad's last car I probably would have bought it just to have his last car. Unfortunately he went from that to a Buick Century that he never liked and didn't do much for me either. It got turned back in about a year ago.
#6462 of 7263
Re: american car companies' lousy performance [fezo] by lemko
Oct 24, 2008 (11:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Oct 24, 2008 10:54 am)

It would be quite a drop from going to a Cadillac DeVille to a recent Buick Century. Recent Centuries had such austere interiors, they made a 1960s Chevrolet Biscayne look luxurious in comparison.
 
The Buick LaCrosse was a vast improvement over the Century/Regal. I've seen recent pictures of the next LaCrosse based on the Invicta concept that makes me want to consider a LaCrosse for myself if my '88 Park Ave ever dies. So far, I'm extremely happy with my new Cadillac DTS Performance.
#6463 of 7263
Factory Closures? by lemko
Oct 24, 2008 (11:03 am)
Reply
Not in America, but China of all places!
 
http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/sns-ap-as-china-factory-woes,0,5598442.story

Messages Page 647 of 727
1
...
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
...
727
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement