Sign In Join 



Its official: Volvo C30-What do you think?

103 messages,  Last post on Aug 02, 2007 at 12:59 PM

You are in the Future Vehicles Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h

What is this discussion about? Volvo


Messages Page 5 of 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
11
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 103
Re: I'm interested... [10scoachrick] by volvomax
Dec 08, 2006 (1:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 10scoachrick (Dec 08, 2006 1:34 pm)

August 2007, give or take
#42 of 103
pricing change? by qbrozen
Jan 08, 2007 (8:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Oct 03, 2006 4:20 pm)

Hmmm... now C&D is reporting that the C30 will start at $25k.
 
volvomax, do you know which is the real number? $23k or $25k?
 
It makes quite a bit of difference, IMHO. Whereas I was looking at a T5 with premium pack for ~$25k, now we're talking ~$27k, which is midsize japanese territory. I think there was a good argument for the C30 at $23k (just a bit more than a Civic Si or GTI, but more power and refinement for that money). At $25k, it would be hard not to opt for something like an Accord EXV6 instead and get more power and space.
#43 of 103
Re: pricing change? [qbrozen] by volvomax
Jan 08, 2007 (8:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jan 08, 2007 8:02 am)

Whatever the base ends up being, the realistic price for the cars looks to be in the $27-28k range.
First of all, nobody buys the base car, so base price really isn't important. Its the price with the features that you want that matters.
Second, the Accords price is irrelevant. The people who would buy this don't need the space or size of the Honda.
The better comparision is the Mini and the Golf GTI.
Heck, there are plenty of smaller cars that are in the "japanese midsize" price class. If you want sheer size, there are plenty of minvans in that price class too.
The C30 does need to be price competitive, but only in its own class.
#44 of 103
Re: pricing change? [volvomax] by qbrozen
Jan 08, 2007 (8:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Jan 08, 2007 8:25 am)

The better comparision is the Mini and the Golf GTI.
 
But its quite a bit more than those, if it starts at $25k. And I'm not saying that's a bad thing, because I believe the C30 will prove to be a class above those. Oh, and since all of the mags compare the Si to the GTI, you can bet consumers do, too. The GTI attracts people who make that comparison because they are getting a bit more refinement for $2k more. The C30 would attract buyers making the comparison to the GTI who are willing to spend $1k more for another step up in refinement. At $3k more, its just that much tougher of a sale.
 
What I'm trying to say is, it is basically creating its own class (one vacated by the C230), but it will only succeed in that class if its just a bit above the GTI/Mini S/Si. The GTI currently starts the highest at $22k. At a significant amount above those, I think buyers would either choose the cheaper competitor or step up to a more expensive "non-competitor." You can say its not a competitor to japanese coupes all you want, but I know that when friends, family, or even I shop for a vehicle, we will compare cars of similar price and function, and those don't always fall in the same "class." I compared and debated an Accord Coupe and 350z. So if that doesn't say it all, I don't know what does.
 
Base price is important for the sake of comparisons. If you want to compare optioned up models, that's fine, but it will still be the same relative price when compared to optioned up models of the competitors.
#45 of 103
Re:Price by volvomax
Jan 08, 2007 (8:52 am)
Reply
An Accord coupe and a 350Z??
Now that sound like someone who really doesn't know what they want.
That comparision isn't a valid comparision because there is no common ground.
There is no way to judge which car is better because those 2 cars do very different things and have very different specs.
You HAVE to have some common frame of reference.
As to the GTI price point, look at the prices w/ the options you want. The Volvo may have the higher base, but it could also have more standard features. Motor co's want you to fall for the base price game. It gets you in the door.
Also, look at the other specs. The Volvo will be quicker than the GTI, C30 0-60 in 6.2, GTI in 7.2.
The C30 is bigger than the Mini(and faster)and will be priced competitively.
#46 of 103
Re:Price [volvomax] by qbrozen
Jan 08, 2007 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Jan 08, 2007 8:52 am)

actually, depending on your criteria, common ground can usually be found.
 
For me, it was a 6-speed 2-door that could hit 60 in less than 6 secs. I also compared the TT, Boxster, and S2k. I narrowed it down to the Accord and 350z (because those were the only i could fit comfortably in).
 
I can't remember the 0-60 number I've seen, but I think it may have been a tick slower than 6.2. In any case, I think it, the Mini S, and the Civic Si will all be within a few clicks of each other.
 
We'll have to see what the standard features are, but I'd imagine its close to the S40 T5.
#47 of 103
Re:Price [qbrozen] by volvomax
Jan 08, 2007 (1:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jan 08, 2007 10:01 am)

The TT, Boxster, S2000 and 350 are all similar cars. They are sports cars so a discussion of their good and bad points is possible.
The Accord coupe is a family sedan minus 2 doors.
It doesn't go, stop or turn like the above cars.
It would be like having Queen Latifah compete in the Miss Universe pageant. Yes she is a woman and so there is common ground, but c'mon!
#48 of 103
Re:Price [volvomax] by qbrozen
Jan 08, 2007 (1:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Jan 08, 2007 1:10 pm)

It doesn't go, stop or turn like the above cars.
 
i know you have a bias against honda, vmax, and that's fine. But I still feel the need to correct you.
 
The Accord Coupe V6 hits 60 in 5.9 secs, the same as a Boxster. And it has skidpad grip on par with a TT.
 
Will it go around a track as good as the others? Of course not. But I use a backseat far more often than I go to a track. These are the kinds of questions buyers face, not whether or not the volvo comes standard with headlight washers.
 
(by the way, at that time, I picked the 350z.)
#49 of 103
Re:Price [qbrozen] by volvomax
Jan 08, 2007 (2:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jan 08, 2007 1:25 pm)

I have no bias against Honda. They make a fine appliance.
But they aren't sports cars.
Where on earth did you see/hear of an Accord hitting 60 mph in 5.9 sec??
#50 of 103
Re:Price [volvomax] by qbrozen
Jan 09, 2007 (8:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Jan 08, 2007 2:53 pm)

see? you are just out of touch with the advances they've made. I used the think the same as you.
 
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtests/7011/honda-accord-coupe-ex-v-6.html
(note that this is before its slight bump in power)
 
here it is in sedan form with the power bump:
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons/10519/2006-honda-accord-ex-v-6.html
 
Unfortunately, I find the other sites too difficult to search on. I can at least tell you that MotorTrend got the identical times in their automatic V6 that C&D did, so I'd assume they would get the same in the manual.
 
But, anyway, we're kind of off topic (although i'm not sure anymore). My point still boils down to ... c30=$23k-$28k=yes. c30=$25k-$30k=no.

Messages Page 5 of 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
11
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement